A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

On hold for 8+ plus minutes - your call is very important



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old July 1st 07, 09:38 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default On hold for 8+ plus minutes - your call is very important


"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
m...

If the government stays the course, DUAT's days are numbered
in favor of LockMart's web service.


What course would that be?


  #22  
Old July 1st 07, 10:03 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
skym
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 67
Default On hold for 8+ plus minutes - your call is very important

How long do you all think it will be before we have to give Lockmart
our credit card number before receiving any service?

  #23  
Old July 1st 07, 10:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default On hold for 8+ plus minutes - your call is very important

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
m...
If the government stays the course, DUAT's days are numbered
in favor of LockMart's web service.


What course would that be?


To not modify the contract with LM that includes the
Internet FSS portal and not renew the DUAT contracts.


  #24  
Old July 1st 07, 10:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default On hold for 8+ plus minutes - your call is very important

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
m...
As soon as they pull the plug on DUAT, you won't have any
choice other than to go grovelling to LockMart if you want
to submit flightplans (unless you're going to do them from
your ATC facility).


Why would they pull the plug on DUAT?


Because they've contracted with LockMart for web-based
services that are redundant to that.

http://www.generalaviationnews.com/e...index&-nothing
  #25  
Old July 1st 07, 11:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default On hold for 8+ plus minutes - your call is very important


"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
m...

To not modify the contract with LM that includes the
Internet FSS portal and not renew the DUAT contracts.


Not renewing the contracts with the present providers of DUAT does not mean
there won't be DUAT.


  #26  
Old July 1st 07, 11:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default On hold for 8+ plus minutes - your call is very important


"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
m...

Because they've contracted with LockMart for web-based
services that are redundant to that.


Which means DUAT will go on.


  #27  
Old July 1st 07, 11:13 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Fry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 369
Default On hold for 8+ plus minutes - your call is very important

"SM" == Steven P McNicoll writes:
If the government stays the course, DUAT's days are numbered
in favor of LockMart's web service.


SM What course would that be?

To turn everything over to private, because private is so much more
efficient and delivers much better service. I just wish they'd
outsource the presidency. Oh wait, they did, to the VP and the
right-wing religious ayatollahs.

--
I have always found that plans are useless, but planning is
indispensable.
Dwight Eisenhower
  #28  
Old July 1st 07, 11:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default On hold for 8+ plus minutes - your call is very important


"Bob Fry" wrote in message
...

To turn everything over to private, because private is so much more
efficient and delivers much better service.


Excellent. The private sector has been providing better service than FSS
for years.


  #29  
Old July 2nd 07, 01:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default On hold for 8+ plus minutes - your call is very important


"Bob Fry" wrote in message
...

That's funny. When the government was running the FSS, things
worked. Now that private is running it, things suck.


When the government was running FSS it worked, but it didn't work as well as
DUAT and it cost considerably more. A better alternative to contracting FSS
would have been eliminating FSS.


  #30  
Old July 2nd 07, 03:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Andrew Gideon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 516
Default On hold for 8+ plus minutes - your call is very important

On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:25:54 -0700, Matt Barrow wrote:

Go to DUATS, brief, file, fly...

Quite!


If every little airport had a decent Internet connection, I'd agree.

Well...not entirely. Pre-changeover I'd some very educational
conversations with FSS about weather in this area or that. DUATS doesn't
do that.

- Andrew

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
60 minutes Scott Calvert Soaring 3 September 12th 06 04:23 PM
Watch 60 Minutes on Nov 6th Roger Worden Soaring 2 October 22nd 05 03:09 PM
60 Minutes 4/17 Jimbob Piloting 51 April 25th 05 09:34 PM
Airbus 15 minutes of fame over? Buzzer Military Aviation 5 January 20th 04 04:42 AM
Precession of 10 degrees in 10 minutes too much? Jay Moreland Instrument Flight Rules 11 August 15th 03 01:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.