Awesome moonscape

On Dec 21, 10:41 am, "Kloudy via AviationKB.com" u33403@uwe wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
Besides JAXA as having been excluding those natural color images of
our moon, is there any good technical reason(s) as to why the JAXA/
SELENE(KAGUYA) science via their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and "Gamma
Ray Spectrometer(GRS)" is being kept secret?

-BradGuth-

Nice try...you're an idiot.

and not a very good troll.

this was hilarious, thanks

--
Message posted via AviationKB.comhttp://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/aviation/200712/1

Then where's that NASA/Apollo unfiltered Kodak moment of secondary/
recoil blue?

Or how about your sharing the other good one of where's Venus?
- Brad Guth -

BradGuth wrote in
:

On Dec 21, 10:41 am, "Kloudy via AviationKB.com" u33403@uwe wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
Besides JAXA as having been excluding those natural color images of
our moon, is there any good technical reason(s) as to why the JAXA/
SELENE(KAGUYA) science via their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and
"Gamma Ray Spectrometer(GRS)" is being kept secret?

-BradGuth-

Nice try...you're an idiot.

and not a very good troll.

this was hilarious, thanks

--
Message posted via
AviationKB.comhttp://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/aviation/20071
2/1

Then where's that NASA/Apollo unfiltered Kodak moment of secondary/
recoil blue?

Or how about your sharing the other good one of where's Venus?


Wasn't that an episode of Fireball XL5?


Bertie

LOL! Rad-hard Apollo wizards, Men in Black and the "Semitic Third Reich."
Gee, that's all he had to say. I'm a total believer now. -c



"BradGuth" wrote in message
...
Besides JAXA as having been excluding those natural color images of
our moon, is there any good technical reason(s) as to why the JAXA/
SELENE(KAGUYA) science via their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and "Gamma
Ray Spectrometer(GRS)" is being kept secret?

The Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye. A good
orange/amber worth of an optical spectrum filter (as added onto their
otherwise bandpass coated lens) would have permitted a somewhat more
natural color looking moon, as though viewed from Earth by using a
quality telescope that's getting extensively filtered by our polluted
atmosphere and secondly by the rather extensive 8r(8X radius) worth of
sodium atmosphere associated with that moon.

However, it looks as though we're still being lied to again and again
by NASA's rusemasters in charge of snookering humanity for all it's
worth. In other words, it seems their MI5/CIA boss or MIB agent in
charge of damage control that's likely standing directly behind each
operator of all those spendy supercomputer work stations (with a
loaded gun pointed at each of their empty heads) is not about to allow
any public Usenet chat about our physically dark and such an unusually
blue moon, or much less about how their NASA and of those rad-hard
Apollo wizards, along with all that Semitic Third Reich kind of right
stuff as having so nicely managed to always avoid those blue saturated
hues as well as their having always hidden Venus at the same time.

JAXA / SELENE (KAGUYA)
http://www.selene.jaxa.jp/en/communi...#NEW_20071214A

Notice their intentional color removal of the moon itself, and of
those very same images as otherwise depicting mother Earth in full
color. (it's quite easy to prove this being the case)

Down on the same page are those other original full color images of
mostly the moon itself along with parts of the their spacecraft as
depicted within such a nifty bluish saturation hue. Remember that
Selene's quality optics had been custom bandpass coated in order to
cut out the vast bulk of UV and IR to start with.

The rather impressive blue saturated hue or color skewed amount of
color tint is clearly that of an expected color shift or blue
saturated image result, that's unavoidably their CCD obtained result
of the raw secondary/recoil worth of what most such reactive items as
getting UV saturated should always look like to such a bandpass
filtered CCD w/o having the necessary color correction filter, as
otherwise especially blue saturated as to that of what any unfiltered
Kodak film recorded image (via NASA/Apollo) should have depicted.

Unfortunately, the JAXA "KAGUYA Image Gallery" that's apparently
forever stuck with using the "Adobe(R) Flash Player(R)" is what
seriously sucks, as sharing far less than full resolution and
otherwise running extremely poorly on most computers w/o a super fast
internet connection and lots of extra PC memory.

The science from their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and "Gamma Ray
Spectrometer(GRS)" as likely being equally saturated at much greater
levels than expected, as such may also have to become excluded from
the general public, because of such data being so unexpectedly intense
or off-scale, in that an entirely new effort at obtaining such
intended science about the complex surface of our physically dark moon
may have to wait for the next available mission. Perhaps the lunar
exploration efforts by India will have adapted the necessary narrow
bandpass of sufficient optical spectrum filtering with sufficient
color correction, as well as for their science instruments having
either greater XRS/GRS scope or much tighter resolution in order to
properly deal with the unusual gamma and X-ray intensity of what that
naked and very anticathode moon actually represents.

KAGUYA/(SELENE) HDTV/CCD imaging getting its first full solar dosage
or skewed saturation of those pesky raw secondary photons, as for
looking rather deep blue.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071021_kaguya_e.pdf
http://www.selene.jaxa.jp/index_e.htm
http://www.kaguya.jaxa.jp/en/
Notice as to all of the unavoidable UV secondary/recoil worth of
bluish and/or extra purple/violet saturation that KAGUYA/(SELENE) HDTV
is having to deal with, even though their having incorporated a
sufficient UV spectrum cut-off filter and currently using not more
than a few percent worth of their HDTV dynamic range(DR), even so
having no problems with recording the physically dark moon along with
Earth that's not even half the albedo worth of Venus which has greater
than 2.6 kw/m2 to work with. Far better images are soon enough going
to be accomplished, especially with those other onboard CCD
instruments that'll far exceed what most of our previous science about
our extremely unusual moon had to say.
- Brad Guth -

Apparently the new and improved moon science via China and Japan do
not hardly exist as far as Usenet and especially the likes of NASA's
uplink.space.com firewall. Besides JAXA as having been recently
excluding those natural color images of our moon, is there any good
technical reason(s) as to why the JAXA/SELENE(KAGUYA) science via
their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and "Gamma Ray Spectrometer(GRS)" are
also being kept secret?

FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye. A
good orange/amber worth of an optical spectrum filter (as added onto
their otherwise bandpass coated lens) would have permitted a somewhat
more natural color looking moon, as though viewed from Earth by using
a quality telescope that's getting extensively filtered by our
polluted atmosphere and secondly by the rather extensive 8r(8X radius)
worth of the sodium(Na) saturated atmosphere that's associated with
our moon, of which our NASA/Apollo wizards that had to have been so
blinded by Venus, as for their having somehow missed entirely the
lunar element of sodium (Na11 solid @.97 g/cm3) that's continually
getting vaporised and leaving the moon's extremely hot surface as the
solar wind manages to create that 900,000 ~ 1,000,000 km comet like
tail of lunar Na.

However, at best it looks as though we're still being lied to again
and again by NASA's Usenet swarm of brown-nosed rusemasters in charge
of snookering humanity for all it's worth. In other words, it seems
their MI5/CIA boss or MIB agents in charge of their PR damage control
that's likely standing directly behind each operator of all those
spendy supercomputer work stations (with a loaded gun pointed at each
of their empty borg like heads) is not about to allow any public
Usenet chat about our physically dark and unusually blue moon of such
sodium, or much less share anything about how their NASA and of those
rad-hard Apollo wizards, along with all that Semitic Third Reich kind
of right stuff, as having so nicely managed via unfiltered optics to
always avoid those BLUE saturated hues as well as their having always
managed to hide Venus at the same time.

JAXA / SELENE (KAGUYA)
http://www.selene.jaxa.jp/en/communi...#NEW_20071214A

Notice their intentional color removal of the moon itself, and of
those very same images as otherwise depicting mother Earth in full
color. (it's quite easy to prove this being the case)

Down on that same page are a few of those other original full color
images of mostly the moon itself along with parts of the their
spacecraft as depicted within such a rather nifty bluish saturation
hue or tint. Remember that Selene's quality optics had been custom
bandpass coated in order to cut out the vast bulk of UV and IR to
start with, even to the point of attenuating some of the violet
spectrum.

The rather impressive blue saturated hue or color skewed amount of
bluish tint is clearly that offering an expected color shift or sort
of UV black-light forced blue saturated image result, as unavoidably
of their CCD obtained result from all the raw secondary/recoil worth
of what most such reactive items as getting UV saturated should look
like, as even to such a bandpass filtered CCD w/o having the necessary
deep color correction filter, as otherwise getting especially blue
saturated as to that of what any unfiltered Kodak film recorded image
(via NASA/Apollo) should have depicted.

Unfortunately, the JAXA "KAGUYA Image Gallery" that's apparently
forever stuck with using the "Adobe(R) Flash Player(R)" is what
seriously sucks, as sharing far less than full resolution and
otherwise running extremely poorly on most computers w/o a super fast
internet connection and having lots of extra PC memory to spare.

The science from their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and "Gamma Ray
Spectrometer(GRS)" as likely being equally saturated at much greater
levels than expected, as such may also have to become excluded from
the general public, because of such data being so unexpectedly intense
or off-scale, in that an entirely new effort at obtaining such
intended science about the complex surface of our physically dark moon
may have to wait for the next available mission. Perhaps the lunar
exploration efforts by India will have adapted the necessary narrow
bandpass of sufficient optical spectrum filtering with sufficient
color correction, as well as for their science instruments having
either greater XRS/GRS scope or much tighter resolution in order to
properly deal with the unusual gamma and X-ray intensity of what that
naked and very anticathode moon actually represents.

KAGUYA/(SELENE) HDTV/CCD imaging getting its first full solar dosage
or skewed saturation of those pesky raw secondary photons, as for
looking rather deep blue.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071021_kaguya_e.pdf
http://www.selene.jaxa.jp/index_e.htm
http://www.kaguya.jaxa.jp/en/
Notice as to all of the unavoidable UV secondary/recoil worth of
looking bluish and/or extra purple/violet saturation that KAGUYA/
(SELENE) HDTV is having to deal with, even though their having
incorporated a sufficient UV spectrum cut-off filter and currently
using not more than a few percent worth of their HDTV dynamic
range(DR), yet having no problems with recording the physically dark
moon along with Earth that's not even worth half the albedo of Venus
which has greater than 2.6 kw/m2 of raw solar influx to work with.
Far better images are soon enough going to be accomplished, especially
with those other onboard CCD instruments that'll far exceed what most
of our previous science about our extremely unusual moon had to say.
- Brad Guth -


On Dec 14, 9:56 am, "ManhattanMan" wrote:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/

Todays "Astronomy Picture Of The Day" - it changes daily so this moonscape
is only on today Friday 12/14.

Man, what a panorama!

And it's not OT, as Frank Sinatra crooned, "Fly me to the moon"....

Cheers'n beers.. [_])
Don

BradGuth wrote:


FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye.

Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can be pink.

On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder wrote:
BradGuth wrote:

FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye.

Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can be pink.

Are you saying that China and Japan had each put blue bandpass filters
on their color cameras?
- Brad Guth -

BradGuth wrote in news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
:

On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder wrote:
BradGuth wrote:

FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye.

Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can be pink.

Are you saying that China and Japan had each put blue bandpass filters
on their color cameras?
- Brad Guth -


Why, do they **** pink?


Bertie

On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
BradGuth wrote in news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
:

On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder wrote:
BradGuth wrote:

FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye.

Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can be pink.

Are you saying that China and Japan had each put blue bandpass filters
on their color cameras?
-BradGuth-

Why, do they **** pink?

Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a feather flock
together.
- Brad Guth

Perhaps the best "what-if" and/or future revisions of of
science.space.history from the perspective of everything from Japan
and China that's getting such new and improved science data about our
unusually surface massive and nearby moon that's looking as though so
unusually blue, as such is having to be mainstream taboo/nondisclosure
rated and/or moderated to death for all it's worth, all because it's
getting too freaking honest and clearly not sufficiently Semitic
enough in order to suit those in charge of our private parts.

As having said this so often before; Our blue moon as having been
recently color CCD imaged with quality bandpass coated optics is in
fact looking rather secondary/recoil photon bluish, pretty much
exactly as it should appear to those insufficiently filtered cameras.
Of course those of our NASA/Apollo EVA cameras had no such narrow
bandpass coatings whatsoever, much less of having any color hue
saturation cutoff worth of optical element, but yet they did have all
of that nifty Kodak film that was apparently made rad-hard and
otherwise naturally more spectrum sensitive than the human eye, along
with having more than a sufficient worth of dynamic range(DR) in order
to have easily recorded Venus.

BTW, our moon's albedo on average of 0.11 is nearly as physically dark
as an open pit coal mine. Go figure upon which other nearly white
guano island sort of moon as having been xenon arc lamp spectrum
illuminated that our rad-hard Apollo wizards landed upon, instead of
the physically dark and unavoidably reactive basalt naked surface of
such iron, cobalt, sodium and titanium worth of our crystal dry and
extremely dusty moon that's upon average physically darker than
basalt, and as such representing that unavoidably gamma and X-ray
anticathode nasty environment in addition to all of its naked basalt
and dusty surface as being so unavoidably electrostatic charged.

BTW No.2, those raw 10 meter per pixel images via JAXA are going to
extrapolate out to offering as good as one fuzzy meter per pixel of
resampled enlargements, but otherwise of perfectly worthy images
depicting most anything of any significant size that's any part of our
NASA/Apollo stuff.

I honestly expect to eventually see those NASA/Apollo remainders as
dust covered forms of something artificial within each of their
artificial impact craters, or at best of their one-way hard landing
site, whereas only the most robust of rad-hard robotics could have
survived for any length of time.

Otherwise we're forever stuck within the cloak and dagger loops of one
of those pesky "don't ask, don't tell" situations.

- Brad Guth

BradGuth wrote:
BTW, our moon's albedo on average of 0.11 is nearly as physically dark
as an open pit coal mine.

So what? The albedo of a green golf course is 0.13. The albedo of a
conifer forest is only about 0.083.

You need to get out more. Go to a basalt flow on Earth - there are
plenty. Or get outside and look up at the full moon some night. You're
hanging your hat on the most feeblest of all threads.

Speaking of coal mines, compare these photos:
http://www.geokem.com/images/scans/I..._coal_mine.jpg
http://www.geokem.com/images/scans/N...-Geologist.jpg

with this one:
http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/Project...g/MoonBack.jpg

So what did you think of the piloting of Neil Armstrong? (Trying to
make this topical! ;-))