![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:29:10 -0700 (PDT), Denny
wrote: Dudley, I am an ugly american that thinks the so called Royal Family is a bunch rich hawgs feeding at the public trough over there Well, Obama seems to have increased his family income from a bit less than $1 million in 2006 to $1.7 million in 2007, and the Clintons famously earned $109 million between 2000 and 2006. (By applying for an extension, they have cleverly managed to boot their 2007 return information past the Democratic National Convention.) McCain evidently married a rich lady, as did Kerry of recent fame. So it would appear that us ugly Americans have also figured out how to become rich out of public service. Blue skies! -- Dan Ford Claire Chennault and His American Volunteers, 1941-1942 new from HarperCollins www.FlyingTigersBook.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley Henriques writes:
I for one will share my sky with a man of Prince William's obvious character. So if someone has "character," he doesn't need flying ability or training to get a pilot's license? It's bad enough when people depend too much on credentials; it's even worse when the credentials have absolutely nothing to do with the activity at hand. Be a royal, get a license--no competence or training required. Your sycophants will still share the skies with you, no matter how dangerous you are. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Dudley Henriques writes: I for one will share my sky with a man of Prince William's obvious character. So if someone has "character," he doesn't need flying ability or training to get a pilot's license? It's bad enough when people depend too much on credentials; it's even worse when the credentials have absolutely nothing to do with the activity at hand. Be a royal, get a license--no competence or training required. Your sycophants will still share the skies with you, no matter how dangerous you are. Your comment I believe is in need of some correction if I may :-) Prince William has no solo flying privileges he hasn't earned, and any flying he might do now or in the future I'm quite certain will be conducted totally within the confines of his level of demonstrated competence. Prince William's "character" as you put it, although at a very high level, will in no way open doors for him to fly anything, or in fact do anything, in an aircraft he hasn't been authorized by competent RAF authority to fly. The RAF has no interest whatsoever in losing either Prince William or one of their aircraft and are quite competent to keep each in one piece. -- Dudley Henriques |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Prince William has no solo flying privileges he hasn't earned, and any
flying he might do now or in the future I'm quite certain will be conducted totally within the confines of his level of demonstrated competence. Prince William's "character" as you put it, although at a very high level, will in no way open doors for him to fly anything, or in fact do anything, in an aircraft he hasn't been authorized by competent RAF authority to fly. The RAF has no interest whatsoever in losing either Prince William or one of their aircraft and are quite competent to keep each in one piece. Oh no, no, no. No one would ever allow them to do anything stupid just because of who they are, now would they? Er, well ... see http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m..._/ai_n13995635 E |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
me wrote:
Prince William has no solo flying privileges he hasn't earned, and any flying he might do now or in the future I'm quite certain will be conducted totally within the confines of his level of demonstrated competence. Prince William's "character" as you put it, although at a very high level, will in no way open doors for him to fly anything, or in fact do anything, in an aircraft he hasn't been authorized by competent RAF authority to fly. The RAF has no interest whatsoever in losing either Prince William or one of their aircraft and are quite competent to keep each in one piece. Oh no, no, no. No one would ever allow them to do anything stupid just because of who they are, now would they? Er, well ... see http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m..._/ai_n13995635 E This accident was a dual flight, not solo, and as such is outside the confines of our discussion. It also was not authorized. The argument to make this incident unique to the Prince of Wales is a stretch, as this type of thing has happened many many times before to plain ordinary people. The instructor involved in the incident was faulted which from what I am reading, was duly justified. This type of accident is not unique at all to the Prince of Wales and has occurred unfortunately since time immemorial both involving flight instructors AND pilots generally, when newbies are allowed to fly the airplane and allowed so deeply into errors that the PIC of the aircraft can't recover same. The bottom line here is that although the accident was unfortunate, what happened wasn't unique at all as applies to the Prince of Wales. -- Dudley Henriques |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-04-15, Dudley Henriques wrote:
The RAF has no interest whatsoever in losing either Prince William or one of their aircraft and are quite competent to keep each in one piece. He is also a Police-trained motorcyclist, with a strong interest with the Isle of Man TT. It causes some interesting problems for the police officer who is charged with his safety while visiting! -- From the sunny Isle of Man. Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dylan Smith wrote:
On 2008-04-15, Dudley Henriques wrote: The RAF has no interest whatsoever in losing either Prince William or one of their aircraft and are quite competent to keep each in one piece. He is also a Police-trained motorcyclist, with a strong interest with the Isle of Man TT. It causes some interesting problems for the police officer who is charged with his safety while visiting! One can only imagine the conflict some of these people endure when asked to "instruct" the Prince on these endeavors. On one hand I'm sure they want to do a credible job of teaching him what he needs to know, while on the other hand they have to be sweating bullets to insure he isn't hurt in the process. So far so good anyway. I'm sure it doesn't help the "instructors" any when they realize that William doesn't seem to fancy himself special in any way and wants to go at these things head on like everybody else. :-) I like the Prince and I admire his guts and style. I also feel sorry for him and the people charged with instructing him because strange as it might seem, when you are instructing in things that can kill someone, holding back in any way can actually make the endeavor more dangerous than it would be otherwise. Trust me, I know about these things having instructed VERY rich pilots on go-arounds in airplanes like the P51 :-)) I remember Vince Lombardi the famous football coach once saying that the quickest way to get seriously injured playing football was to hold back on a tackle. For the Prince it has to be very hard learning things like flying and motorcycling with his instructors over compensating to protect him. -- Dudley Henriques |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley Henriques writes:
Prince William has no solo flying privileges he hasn't earned, and any flying he might do now or in the future I'm quite certain will be conducted totally within the confines of his level of demonstrated competence. Which privileges did he miss out on by skipping 195 of the 208 weeks that a normal RAF pilot spends in training? Prince William's "character" as you put it, although at a very high level, will in no way open doors for him to fly anything, or in fact do anything, in an aircraft he hasn't been authorized by competent RAF authority to fly. Uh-huh. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Dudley Henriques writes: Prince William has no solo flying privileges he hasn't earned, and any flying he might do now or in the future I'm quite certain will be conducted totally within the confines of his level of demonstrated competence. Which privileges did he miss out on by skipping 195 of the 208 weeks that a normal RAF pilot spends in training? Prince William's "character" as you put it, although at a very high level, will in no way open doors for him to fly anything, or in fact do anything, in an aircraft he hasn't been authorized by competent RAF authority to fly. Uh-huh. Please take your idiotic and biased posts to someone else. I'm not interested. -- Dudley Henriques |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 16, 6:51 am, Mxsmanic wrote:
Dudley Henriques writes: Prince William has no solo flying privileges he hasn't earned, and any flying he might do now or in the future I'm quite certain will be conducted totally within the confines of his level of demonstrated competence. Which privileges did he miss out on by skipping 195 of the 208 weeks that a normal RAF pilot spends in training? Jealousy rears its ignorant head .. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Cessna Wings for the World by William D. Thompson | [email protected] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | March 16th 05 09:42 PM |
Prince propellors | Mike Borgelt | Home Built | 6 | December 12th 03 06:41 AM |
Prince propeller | Philippe Vessaire | Home Built | 3 | October 27th 03 08:04 PM |