traitorous SOB

"fudog50" wrote in message
...
So you have resorted to "trolling", tarver? How low can you go?

The post is purely for the purpose of propigation, although it has drawn
several troll replys.

On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 14:31:11 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:

http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com/

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...
http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com/


Well, it can be said of Kerry that at least he went and served his country.
Like most other chickenhawks, W. found other places to be during Vietnam.
He even went so far as to cash in his connections to get placed ahead of a
long list to become a Guard pilot even though he scored the lowest score
possible. His record as a member of the NG is now biting his chickenhawk
ass:

http://www.awolbush.com/

The fact that he came home from what he felt to be an immoral and evil war
and tried to stop it using his Constitutional rights makes him a man of
character, not a traitor. If you cannot understand that, then I feel sorry
for you. Anyone who does not tow the party line is a traitor? Are you a
communist or just a fascist?
Please read the First 10 Amendments to the Constitution if you have any
questions about it.

I am not a democrat, and I have tended to vote republican in many elections,
not this time though. He lied about why we went to war, lied about his
military career, he lies practically every time he opens his mouth. Clinton
was a rank amatuer compared to this guy:

http://praesentia.us/archives/dishonestdubya.html

"Divine Shadow" wrote:

[snipped for brevity]

The fact that he came home from what he felt to be an immoral and evil war
and tried to stop it using his Constitutional rights makes him a man of
character, not a traitor.

Most excellent point. However, while we cannot attack Kerry on his
military record or his anti-war protests that followed, we can attack
his politcal record such as his waffling around with regards to the
current unpleasantries in Southwest Asia.

"Mike Marron" wrote in message
...
"Divine Shadow" wrote:

[snipped for brevity]

The fact that he came home from what he felt to be an immoral and evil war
and tried to stop it using his Constitutional rights makes him a man of
character, not a traitor.

Most excellent point. However, while we cannot attack Kerry on his
military record or his anti-war protests that followed, we can attack
his politcal record such as his waffling around with regards to the
current unpleasantries in Southwest Asia.

Current unpleasantries in Southwest Asia? What specifically are we talking
about?

George Z.

"George Z. Bush" wrote:
"Mike Marron" wrote:
"Divine Shadow" wrote:

The fact that he came home from what he felt to be an immoral and evil war
and tried to stop it using his Constitutional rights makes him a man of
character, not a traitor.

Most excellent point. However, while we cannot attack Kerry on his
military record or his anti-war protests that followed, we can attack
his politcal record such as his waffling around with regards to the
current unpleasantries in Southwest Asia.

Current unpleasantries in Southwest Asia? What specifically are we talking
about?

Excuse me. I was referring to the war on terrorism which is actually
global but it's primarily being waged in both Southwest and Southeast
Asia and of course, the Middle East.

"Mike Marron" wrote in message
...
"George Z. Bush" wrote:
"Mike Marron" wrote:
"Divine Shadow" wrote:

The fact that he came home from what he felt to be an immoral and evil war
and tried to stop it using his Constitutional rights makes him a man of
character, not a traitor.

Most excellent point. However, while we cannot attack Kerry on his
military record or his anti-war protests that followed, we can attack
his politcal record such as his waffling around with regards to the
current unpleasantries in Southwest Asia.

Current unpleasantries in Southwest Asia? What specifically are we talking
about?

Excuse me. I was referring to the war on terrorism which is actually
global but it's primarily being waged in both Southwest and Southeast
Asia and of course, the Middle East.

OK, but he voted against the war on terrorism, so where's the waffling? And
before you say it, the war on terrorism is the war against OBL and the Taliban;
in many people's eyes, it does NOT include the war on Iraq. That's a military
adventure waged for still unexplained reasons, the war on terrorism not being
one of them.

George Z.

"Mike Marron" wrote in message
...
"Divine Shadow" wrote:

[snipped for brevity]

The fact that he came home from what he felt to be an immoral and evil
war
and tried to stop it using his Constitutional rights makes him a man of
character, not a traitor.

Most excellent point. However, while we cannot attack Kerry on his
military record or his anti-war protests that followed,

Actually, Kerry is very much at risk politically for being a traitor.

"Divine Shadow" wrote in message
. com...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...
http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com/


Well, it can be said of Kerry that at least he went and served his
country.

GW's service is as good as Kerry's, one either served, or they did not.