Apology to rec.aviation...

(Tom) wrote:

Ron Parsons wrote in message ...
Sometimes I forget that this is a rec.aviation group and not for pros
like AvSig on CompuServe used to be when it was sponsored by ASI and
John G. ran it.

Still there are some here who have been there and done that and care to
share with each other and others.

Sharing means backing up your assertions with real-world facts
sometimes, Ron.


But there are also those who think that playing with their Goggle all
day is a real world experience.

..and there are those who think a rudder could move so quickly that
telemetric equipment can't record that movement..

So I'm going to self-moderate by the simple mechanism of putting anyone
who asks for "cite" into the kill file.

Of course, then you'd never have to back up any of your ridiculous
bull**** like "JAA makes it a requirement that airlines who land in
Europe buy Airbus".

I don't mung my email address or bother to reply to emails from those
who do. My reasoning is simple, I believe in quality like Boeing and
Macintosh.

And anyone who hints that other things might have equal or better
quality gets killfiled! Brilliant!

I'll try to keep in mind that not all are professionals here.

Can't say I've seen you demonstrating much professionalism wit this
little hissy fit...

And, among many other errors here you seem to lack experience on
usenet by making that ridiculous statement about not munging your
email address...I said exactly that about 3 years ago and it took
about that long to ruin that address with spammers.

At last count I received 945 emails in a 12 hour period.

That effectively shut down my email function and I had to change
my address (one that I had had and liked for a long time).

Mark my words well sir, because it -will- happen to you.

I must agree with Tom, you certainly don't come across as a pro.
--

-Gord.