![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
... This is true, and addresses the respect issue. On the quality of instruction issue, it's incumbent on the instructor to see that this step is never necessary. -- Dudley Henriques I think Dudley is on the right track. I too have thousands of hours of instruction given and have never said a profane word to a student. I don't remember seeing this tactic in the Flight Instructor Handbook. I think this goes beyond instructing and indicates character on the part of the instructor. One also has to remember that you are representing the profession. It's not a question of effectiveness. It's a question of doing the right thing. -- Regards, Bob F. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
a wrote:
[snip] The other alternative for a student is much more effective: "You're fired." It is not used enough,not just with CFIs but with MDs and others Oh yes, I've done that. I walked into a physician's office once (referral for dermatology issue) who immediately introduced himself as "hello darlin', I'm Doctor xxx" At which point, I replied, "Hello Fred (not his real first name), I'm Doctor YYY". Needless to say, he was rather taken aback and all of a sudden I'm no longer "darlin'" Not only did he not correctly diagnose the problem, what he did prescribe was ineffective (turns out I'm allergic to lanolin which means wool and just about every lotion out there). As for swearing, there's probably very little I haven't heard, since my professional career has been mostly aerospace/aviation with a healthy dose of field geologists. On the other hand, I truly believe that if you can't discuss someone's heritage, parentage and destination in your native language (or other of choice) without resorting to single syllabic words, you really don't have a good command of the language. For those who didn't read it in high school, go find a copy of Cyrano de Bergerac and check out the party scene (early in the book). That's how to insult someone. And Rocky - concerning the other CFIs who get "mentioned" on evals for swearing...it's all based on personality. You obviously can get away with it. And remember folks, Rocky's dealing with Type A+ personalities in the military. These are "super bad dudes" in the privacy of the locker room and outside, Gentlemen (the males) by act of congress. I've taught at the Navy PostGrad school - in class, the aviators are the most gracious. At the parties, after a few beers, defintely different. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blanche wrote
And remember folks, Rocky's dealing with Type A+ personalities in the military. These are "super bad dudes" in the privacy of the locker room and outside, Gentlemen (the males) by act of congress. Why bless you "Darlin'", I've never really thought of myself in those terms. You've given me a whole new image of myself. Can't wait to tell the grandkids.... ![]() ![]() Bob Moore Naval Aviator 15753 25 SEP 1959 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Blanche" wrote ... And remember folks, Rocky's dealing with Type A+ personalities in the military. These are "super bad dudes" in the privacy of the locker room and outside, Gentlemen (the males) by act of congress. "Gentlemen by Act of Congress" Wow, what a great snipit of wisdom for wall at the BAQ. Thanks. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
buttman wrote:
On Sep 12, 2:01 pm, "Ol Shy & Bashful" wrote: Ongoing discussion regarding different techniques. Do we do it with a touchy feely softly spoken and oh my gosh thats just fine..... Or do we do it with a harsh what in hell was that all about? Who did you learn the most from and what was the drill? Of course there is a different perspective from a civilian learning to get over the fear of heights or unusual attitudes (as opposed to the normal of right side up on the highway) and a military student pilot who is going to be exposed to getting shot in the ass with a rocket out in the field when they go operational. What has been most effective for you? The teacher who spent time explaining what you were trying to learn and how it works, or the one who just demanded you do the syllabus? How much time did you have to spend one on one? Or did you even get that opportunity? Did you have to learn under pressure or did you have the luxury of a year or two to get to step one? Was it even important to you to get to step one or two? What was the motivation? Was it for personal satisfaction? Was it because of familial pressure? Lots of factors to consider that impact instructor effectiveness.and student learning. Should be interesting to discuss. Ol S&B CFII/RAM AIGI - Original CFI in 1967 I have noticed that students typically want to be good pilots. They know when they've made a bad landing, and they are willing to look at themselves critically to improve their skill. If the student makes a bad landing, they don't need me there pounding it into their head constantly. If I were to do that, all I'm doing is making them more frustrated, which is making it harder for them to focus and learn. Also, I think sometimes people confuse "strictness" with "harshness". You can still hold high standards and strive for perfection without being harsh or rude. A lot of less experienced instructors will say to themselves "I want to be an instructor that holds high standards", so they'll go out and just constantly bitch at anything and everything the student does thats less than perfect. Some students will react like "Oh wow I really need to turn it up here", while other students (in my opinion, most students), will respond with "this guy has problems, I wish he would just shut up" Good post and good input Butts. -- Dudley Henriques |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:01:09 -0700 (PDT), Ol Shy & Bashful wrote:
Lots of factors to consider that impact instructor effectiveness.and student learning. The best instructors tailor their temperament to the student and the situation. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
In article , Ol Shy & wrote: Who did you learn the most from and what was the drill? I think it's very dependant on the type of personality you are. I learned at a Flying Club where all the instructors were basically volunteers. As a result, throughout my training I had something like 7 or 8 instructors, all with differing style. Personally, I found that I learned more from the instructors that let me make my mistakes, and allowed me to realise I'd made them and have to learn from them myself. I had one instructor that took me on my first Nav flight. Every time I got 1 degree off course, or 100 feet off altitude, or 1 knot off airspeed, she would point it out to me and force me to correct it instantly. To my mind, I learned little from that, because there wouldn't be someone doing the same in the cockpit once I'd qualified. Another instructor (who I completed my training and I found incredibly beneficial) would let me make the mistakes. One I remember in particular was rejoining the circuit at my home base (military field). I made the call to enter the zone, then called joining Right Base, and was asked to report final. In the UK, the military 'final' is a curving turn that starts at around the same point as the base leg would start on a standard rectangular circuit. I got all the way down to about 300 feet before the lady on ATC called "G-ABCD, you *are* now cleared to land, try not to forget to report final in future" I looked over to my instructor and she was grinning away, she said: "I was wondering when you were going to notice!" I definitely didn't forget again! I think what I'm trying to say, is that different people will require a different style of intruction. The mark of a *good* instructor is recognising the style the student needs, and tailoring their instruction accordingly. Andy |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ol Shy & Bashful wrote:
What has been most effective for you? I like the "ruler across the knuckles" approach. If you don't have a ruler handy, a kneeboard across the back of the head works just as good. :-) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Olson wrote in
: I like the "ruler across the knuckles" approach. If you don't have a ruler handy, a kneeboard across the back of the head works just as good. You woulda made a great nun :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) -- |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Godwin wrote:
Frank Olson wrote in : I like the "ruler across the knuckles" approach. If you don't have a ruler handy, a kneeboard across the back of the head works just as good. You woulda made a great nun :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) Funny you should say that. My first brush into compressibility was the day Sister Paskillina caught me smoking in the boys bathroom between classes at St. Aloysius Academy and laid that long hickory pointing stick with the little rubber tip down across my outstretched palm. I can still hear that "whoooooooooosh" !!!!!! :-)))) -- Dudley Henriques |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ground effect effectiveness | Tony | General Aviation | 14 | January 10th 07 11:17 PM |
Ground effect effectiveness | Tony | Piloting | 20 | January 10th 07 11:17 PM |
Effectiveness/clarity of throat mic? | Gary G | Piloting | 2 | October 11th 05 02:18 PM |
Effectiveness/clarity of throat mic? | Gary G | General Aviation | 1 | October 11th 05 01:44 AM |
"CV-22: Impacts of Performance on Cost Effectiveness" | Mike | Military Aviation | 1 | March 18th 04 04:33 PM |