![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wolfgang Schwanke wrote:
In theory you could use GPS altitudes when flying MSL/QNH setting, No. Even with MSL/QNH setting, as you call it, the barometric altimeter does *not* show the true geometric altitude. More precisely, it only shows it in two cases: 1. When sitting on the ground at the reference altitude for the given altimeter setting (QNH) 2. When the atmosphere happens to be an ICAO standard atmosphere. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just to throw a little more fuel on this fire - GPS altitude is in
widespread use in the soaring world and has proven to be very useful for computing height above ground and final glides to destinations. It can also be used to give vertical motion, although not as accurately as a pressure instrument. The biggest difference (other than the previously discussed pressure altitude vs height above the ellipsoid issue) is that while an altimeter, when set to the correct pressure (mb or in hg) for QFE or QNH, is stable in the short term but will become more innacurate over time due to atmospheric pressure changes (not talking about flight levels here), GPS is less accurate in the short term (altitude varies with geometry, etc) but extremely stable over the long term. I won't waste my time on argueing with Mxsmanic - he is really clueless - but it sometimes amazes me how many "real" pilots have a poor grasp on what altimeters really indicate! Speaking of accuracy, anybody remember what the altitude tolerance of an altimeter is? In military jets it's +- 75 feet or so - I have no idea what it is for the non-TSO'd altimeter in my LS6. Which means that as long as your GPS is tracking 4+ satellites with good geometry and no SA, it's altitude (QNH) is probably better than what is shown on your altimeter (but only if you know the difference between MSL and HAE, which can be over 100' in many places...). So - use your altimeter (set correctly) for IFR, and use your aviation GPS to help avoid hitting the hard stuff! Kirk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not nearly as helpful as some of the other posts, but to give you a
sense of how things change, the pressure at 18,000 feet is about half of that on the surface (30 inches of Hg on the surface, 15 at 18,000 feet). It's halved again at twice that altitude (7.5 inches at 36,000) and halved again at twice that altitude (3.7 inches at 72,000 feet). On Nov 24, 1:40*am, es330td wrote: At low altitudes the rule of thumb is that a one thousand foot increase in altitude results in a one inch of mercury decrease in pressure; at least that is what happens when I turn the little knob on my altimeter. *Since commercial planes flight well into the FL300+ range, clearly that rule cannot hold at altitude as a plane taking off at 29.92 inches would find itself in a vacuum at 29,900 feet above sea level. *Can someone with experience of high altitude flight expand on my understanding of pressure variation? Also, since the altimeter in the C182 I fly appears to incorporate that rule of thumb, is it accurate at say, FL120, or is another kind of altimeter needed for planes flying up there? TIA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High Altitude Waypoints | Dennis Johnson | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | May 2nd 08 02:44 AM |
High Altitude Linnies | TTaylor at cc.usu.edu | Soaring | 4 | August 4th 06 10:47 PM |
High altitude & RPM | abripl | Home Built | 1 | September 1st 05 12:12 AM |
High-altitude autorotations? | Bill McClain | Military Aviation | 17 | March 15th 04 04:23 PM |
Low and high altitude airways | David Megginson | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | September 9th 03 01:18 AM |