![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ContestID67 wrote:
OK, lets think about using north-up. My mind would be saying something like, "I am pointing south-east because the compass says so (or the glider icon) and I want to roll out north. Now, which direction am I thermalling? Are there 90 degress or 270 degrees to go? Ok, 270 degrees away, I should be there in 15 seconds. Wait, I just went into sink, let's change that bank angle. Where was north again? Darn, in the Midwest every direction looks identical! Oops, I missed my exit point. I'll have to take one more circle at the top of this thermal in weak lift. Didn't Moffat say that was a no-no? Now, why ARE those other pilots leaving this thermal so soon?" John, it's not that hard! The goal line remains steady while the track line rotates. When the track line approaches the goal line, you can roll out and go! Easy. If you aren't using a goal, you can still easily tell which direction the track line is pointing and roll out on a North heading. In reality, most pilots, most of the time, already know which way to go because they remember what they were heading towards before they began to circle. So, they don't even need to spend any time looking at the PDA. Most of the time I'm thermalling, the map is covered by Mobile's "Thermalling Assistant", so it doesn't matter what the map is doing. The problem with Track Up while circling is it's hard to see what my drift is (wind confirmation), to study the map, or pick another goal, or get the details on some airspace because the map is moving. All these are so much easier when the map is steady - and THAT'S how I reduce my cockpit workload. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This discussion is always really fun to watch :-)
Maybe I spent too much time in my youth playing video game where you drove some tank/helicopter/spaceship around a screen that was always "north up". But north up makes it much easier to use the pda as a MAP, which is what I want if for. Maybe at 300 knots in a Tornado, I might want heading up, but not in a glider. I can't imagine using the PDA to try and roll out on a heading ! There has to be _something_ for a visual reference. Isn't there ? Cloud, sun, ? Todd Smith 3S |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 17, 1:06*pm, toad wrote:
But north up makes it much easier to use the pda as a MAP, which is what I want if for. * Maybe at 300 knots in a Tornado, I might want heading up, but not in a glider. Todd - The question still comes down to this: When heading in a non- north direction and your map is displaying north-up, don't you have to do some mental gymnastics to figure out how the PDA map features (like mountain peaks and lakes and towns) relate to what's in front of the nose of the glider? I'm very much in agreement with the "Track Up" crowd. I don't think of it like a map in a car because for that I'm going to pull off to the side of the road and _study_ it. When I'm flying I want to be able to glance down, and then get my eyes back _outside_. Having the map already showing me exactly what I expect to see out the front of the canopy makes it easy. But I think your comments really illuminate the deeper reason for the big divide on this topic: There are people who use their GPS map like a paper map - a la pre-flight planning; and then there are people who use it differently - like as an "synthetic vision" or "alternative projection" tool. They look at the moving map as a way to view their current situation, but as if their eyeballs could view everything around themselves for miles; or as if they could have an out-of-body experience and see themselves from above. So as a result, this type of person likes to have the map reflect the reality they see outside at that moment; because they're trying to quickly and easily compare and contrast the two "visions" in real-time. I think the "paper-map user" views things in a very different way, but not being that type of user I cannot comment more deeply on what their thought process is. Take care, --Noel (Who doesn't think that one is inherently better than the other - just that some people process things differently in their mind, and thus can get greater use out of one or the other depending on how their brain works) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 17, 5:02*pm, "noel.wade" wrote:
On Dec 17, 1:06*pm, toad wrote: But north up makes it much easier to use the pda as a MAP, which is what I want if for. * Maybe at 300 knots in a Tornado, I might want heading up, but not in a glider. Todd - The question still comes down to this: *When heading in a non- north direction and your map is displaying north-up, don't you have to do some mental gymnastics to figure out how the PDA map features (like mountain peaks and lakes and towns) relate to what's in front of the nose of the glider? Sure, some mental gymnastics are required, but they don't take any significant time, because I have done it that way for so long. I'm very much in agreement with the "Track Up" crowd. *I don't think of it like a map in a car because for that I'm going to pull off to the side of the road and _study_ it. *When I'm flying I want to be able to glance down, and then get my eyes back _outside_. *Having the map already showing me exactly what I expect to see out the front of the canopy makes it easy. I agree about the "eyes outside", but track up mode is slower for me than north up. But I think your comments really illuminate the deeper reason for the big divide on this topic: *There are people who use their GPS map like a paper map - a la pre-flight planning; and then there are people who use it differently - like as an "synthetic vision" or "alternative projection" tool. *They look at the moving map as a way to view their current situation, but as if their eyeballs could view everything around themselves for miles; or as if they could have an out-of-body experience and see *themselves from above. *So as a result, this type of person likes to have the map reflect the reality they see outside at that moment; because they're trying to quickly and easily compare and contrast the two "visions" in real-time. *I think the "paper-map user" views things in a very different way, but not being that type of user I cannot comment more deeply on what their thought process is. That's a good description. I prefer the map picture to stay constant. It allows me to pick up map features easier with a quick glance at the map. The shape of things doesn't change depending on my heading. I can use the glider icon to easily identify relative direction to items in reference to fwd/aft and left/right. Take care, --Noel (Who doesn't think that one is inherently better than the other - just that some people process things differently in their mind, and thus can get greater use out of one or the other depending on how their brain works) Agreed. I have the same conversation with sailors too. Some like one, some the other. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Obviously from this discussion it is just a matter of preference or
what you used to. But one advantage to North Up which I didn't see mentioned so far is that your moving map does not move around all the time, especially when thermaling. Even with the north up thermaling option Paul mentioned, it means the map will switch back and forth between north up and track up when thermaling, which must be more confusing then having a constant orientation. Ramy (always North Up) On Dec 17, 8:40*am, "Paul Remde" wrote: Hi John, I talk to a lot of U.S. glider pilots about soaring software. Most (including myself) seem to prefer track up when cruising and North up when circling. * I like the map to correspond to what I see out the window while cruising. *However, while thermalling I like the map position fixed rather than rotating. *I like that SeeYou Mobile and other software programs can make the switch automatically. Good Soaring, Paul Remde Cumulus Soaring, Inc.http://www.cumulus-soaring.com "ContestID67" wrote in message ... It is winter here and the only soaring we are doing in Chicago is in the hangar . During an energetic discussion on the pros and cons of various soaring programs, I mentioned I fly "Direction-Up", rather than "North-Up". WHOA! You would have thought that I had said I was going to give up soaring to fly helicopters by the dirty looks that I received. Now, to be fair, with every GPS device I use (car, boat, GA), I *ALWAYS* orient the map as north-up, and prefer it overall...except, that is, when soaring. * I started using north-up at first, but soon found that a direction-up display was much better in letting me anticipate the timing of rolling out of a thermal and heading towards the next turn point. *Attempting to coordinate the rotating glider icon on a stationary north-up map, with the view outside and/or compass, all while centering a thermal, is a bit like patting my head and rubbing my stomach at the same time. *Maybe this is unique to a thermal-only soaring climate. * *NOTE: I am not directionally challanged. Anyway, I wondered what others use relative to the type of soaring they do. Thanks, John- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ramy wrote:
Obviously from this discussion it is just a matter of preference or what you used to. But one advantage to North Up which I didn't see mentioned so far is that your moving map does not move around all the time, especially when thermaling. Even with the north up thermaling option Paul mentioned, it means the map will switch back and forth between north up and track up when thermaling, which must be more confusing then having a constant orientation. Ramy (always North Up) Odd thing is, in my glider when I look outside while thermalling the world appears to be moving around. Seriously, I totally agree it's all a matter of preference or more precisely what you have trained your brain to do. I remember when I first started flying R/C gliders. While standing on the ground and looking up at the glider and trying to instantly translate glider turn left/right into the correct actions with my fingers/thumbs seemed impossible. Meanwhile here were all of these guys, many 20-30 years older than me, that were having no trouble at all. Talk about humbling experiences. But I kept practicing and that is the key. It took a certain amount of time for my brain to "re-wire" itself. Before long my fingers simply did the right thing instantly without me having to "think" about it. The brain is an amazing organ. I believe that with practice one could "re-wire" one's brain to use most any combination of PDA settings and be able to quickly translate between PDA screen and the wind screen. Regards, -Doug |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ramy wrote:
Obviously from this discussion it is just a matter of preference or what you used to. But one advantage to North Up which I didn't see mentioned so far is that your moving map does not move around all the time, especially when thermaling. Even with the north up thermaling option Paul mentioned, it means the map will switch back and forth between north up and track up when thermaling, which must be more confusing then having a constant orientation. I and most pilots are very familiar with the North up map, because it's the way we look at maps most of the time for most of our lives. The PDA map also has a the goal line on it, so it's obvious which way the flight is going, even in North up. So, North up isn't confusing. Track Up when flying isn't confusing, because what I can see on the map is what I see out the window. Easy. If you haven't flown with a Track up map, it will likely be confusing for a few flights. It will take a while for your brain to stop translating what it sees as a North Up map, but it'll learn. I didn't choose Track up because it was easier to identify what was ahead (though it is). There wasn't much to identify with the early units - just circles for the airports, no rivers, etc. I initially did it because I wanted the maximum amount of real estate displayed ahead of the glider on the small PDA screen. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flying: Course Up
Driving: North Up Jack |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Procreation: face down
Flying: Course Up Driving: North Up Jack |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 18, 11:30*am, Bill Bullimore
wrote: Procreation: face down Flying: Course Up Driving: North Up Jack- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Or face wherever :} |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Traffic with direction | Dave | Products | 14 | August 10th 05 06:44 AM |
more bitching about the IFR written - CDI left/right versus north/south/etc | G. Sylvester | Instrument Flight Rules | 58 | January 12th 05 02:32 AM |
"zero" versus "oscar" versus "sierra" | Ron Garret | Piloting | 30 | December 20th 04 08:49 AM |
Dr. Jack's Wind Direction | rjciii | Soaring | 14 | October 5th 03 05:37 AM |
Wind Direction | --=JJay=-- | Soaring | 2 | September 27th 03 07:18 PM |