![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In this potential dramatic incident, I think that the pilots and
passengers were also very lucky. I remember pictures of another ditching during winter, (I am not sure it was the Hudson) were there were many survivors from the ditching itself but.....most of them died by hypothermia because the water was freezing. The time that rescue came....it was too late. Only a few were able to reach ground thanks to the courage of some people would could help them from ground. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're talking about Air Florida Flight 90, which went into the
Potomac River in Washington, DC back in 1982. A famous video shows one bystander jumping into the icy river to rescue a woman who was too cold to hang onto a rope. -John On Jan 17, 7:24 am, nimbus wrote: In this potential dramatic incident, I think that the pilots and passengers were also very lucky. I remember pictures of another ditching during winter, (I am not sure it was the Hudson) were there were many survivors from the ditching itself but.....most of them died by hypothermia because the water was freezing. The time that rescue came....it was too late. Only a few were able to reach ground thanks to the courage of some people would could help them from ground. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes indeed ! That's what I had in mind..
Bruno |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 16, 6:53*pm, wrote:
I think the A320 has a RAT for hydraulics as I doubt you can certify an airplane that turns into a lawn dart without engine power. I have spent much of my career working on Douglas jets and am not nearly so familiar with Airbus. I did a bit of research yesterday. Yes A320 has a RAT and it automatically deploys on loss of AC bus 1 and 2 which would happen if both engines lost power (and the APU was not running). The RAT powers the hydraulic system that feeds the primary flight controls and the slats. I think flap hydraulics are provided by a battery driven pump when land recovery mode is selected. If the APU was running, no electrical or hydraulic power is lost. Unlike Douglas and I think Boeing jets, the Airbus RAT drives a hydraulic pump and there is a hydraulic driven generator for electical power. Douglas ADG (Air Driven Generator, DC-10, MD-10 , MD-11) is an electrical generator that can be used to power an electric hydraulic pump. Andy |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 16:57 16 January 2009, Andy wrote:
On Jan 16, 9:48=A0am, "kirk.stant" wrote: I noted that he did not have a seaplane rating and that one probably would have been useful. He landed downstream though, perhaps he had no other option with the altitude available. I don't know the Hudson but it must have a fair current as the Airbus is reported to have gone 4 miles downstream before it was secured. The Hudson is an estuary, and the current past Manhattan runs both ways. To know which way the river was running, he would have had to know the state of the tide. Maybe he should have had some training as captain of a racing sailboat. Jim Beckman |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi All, When we first saw those pictures of the passengers standing on the wings we did not realise that there were no engines on the underside of the wings. They had snapped off in the landing, making the plane a much better boat. I wonder if this is an Airbus design feature, which could be activated by the 'Ditch Switch'. Next time I see any of the lads from Chester, I will ask them just what the Ditch Switch does. They certainly make very good planes at Broughton. Pilot Pete |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:45:03 +0000, Peter Higgs wrote:
I wonder if this is an Airbus design feature, which could be activated by the 'Ditch Switch'. Next time I see any of the lads from Chester, I will ask them just what the Ditch Switch does. At least one thing it does is to close all vents and drain pipes on the underside of the plane to keep it afloat as long as possible. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 17, 10:07*am, Martin Gregorie
wrote: On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:45:03 +0000, Peter Higgs wrote: I wonder if this is an Airbus design feature, which could be activated by the 'Ditch Switch'. Next time I see any of the lads from Chester, I will ask them just what the Ditch Switch does. At least one thing it does is to close all vents and drain pipes on the underside of the plane to keep it afloat as long as possible. -- martin@ * | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org * * * | From the USAirways A320 Pilot Handbook... Ditching PB (Guarded) (PB = push button) ON: The operating system sends a "close" signal to the outflow valve, emergency rams air intake, avionics ventilation inlet and extract valves, pack flow control valves, and forward cargo isolation out valve (if installed). Steve (Retired -USAirways) |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you go he http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/arc...comes_from.php
there is an uncut video from a surveillance camera. It shows the last few seconds of 1549's water landing, the exit of the passengers, and the arrival of three ferries. Plane lands at about 2 minutes in, a lot of passengers out within a minute, the first ferry arrives within 4 minutes. -John |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 17, 6:45*am, Peter Higgs
wrote: Hi All, When we first saw those pictures of the passengers standing on the wings we did not realise that there were no engines on the underside of the wings. They had snapped off in the landing, making the plane a much better boat. I wonder if this is an Airbus design feature, which could be activated by the 'Ditch Switch'. Next time I see any of the lads from Chester, I will ask them just what the Ditch Switch does. They certainly make very good planes at Broughton. Pilot Pete I'm pretty sure it's a design feature. The underwing mounting of big fans like that creates a pretty big downward pitching moment when they hit something as dense as water. It could easily cause the plane to submarine/break up/tumble upon contact with the water. The force is in the opposite direction as typical thrust loads and presumably you can design a mount that shears under that type of load. I doubt you'd need (or want!) a button that sheds the engines, though it raises the possibility of all kinds of practical jokes in the cockpit. 9B |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airliner crashes into Hudson River after LGA departure | Kingfish | Piloting | 206 | January 27th 09 07:16 AM |
USAIR A-320 DOWN IN HUDSON RIVER | Glen in Orlando[_3_] | Aviation Photos | 3 | January 16th 09 09:37 AM |
Plane down in Hudson River | Judah | Piloting | 10 | January 6th 06 04:15 PM |
Flying down the Hudson River | SeeAndAvoid | Piloting | 19 | March 24th 04 06:26 PM |
Hudson river | Paul Sengupta | Piloting | 2 | January 9th 04 12:18 AM |