![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#331
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You don't have to convince me. But I'm not an Arab. I'm just trying to
help people see the mind of the Arab terrorist supporters. To Arab terrorists and their supporters, it doesn't matter that the Arabs have endless miles of desert that was given to them by the UK after it won the land from the Ottomans. To Arab terrorists and their supporters, Israel is their land, and the Jews who control it need to be pushed back into the sea at all costs. It was the promise that was made to them by their parents in 1967 when they left. And in their mind, anyone who disagrees with them is an Infidel who deserves to be killed in the name of Allah. That is how they justify murdering innocent people with suicide bombs. So you see, if we sit quietly and keep our nose out of the other country's business, it will only be a matter of time that the Arabs come after us anyway. Except when they finally do they will be more powerful, and they won't need to attack us in pot-shots like spiders in the woods. To illustrate the long term of your plan, consider what would have happened had we kept our nose out of Hitler's business during WWII. Sure it's possible that he would never have made it all the way here and would have just left us alone. Maybe he would have figured that the US was not interesting enough to be a part of his conquest. But if he wanted the US, and we had just sat idly by while he Blitzkrieged all of Europe and Russia, do you think we would have had a chance against him when he was ready to come up on our shores? With no help from the Allies who we watched as he slaughtered them? (Steven P. McNicoll) wrote in om: Judah wrote in message . .. In the eyes of Radical Islamists? Are you kidding? Israel - it exists UK - it gave the land to Israel How much land did the UK give to the Arabs? |
#332
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... No, it's reversal of conquest. Oh? What conquest do they seek to reverse? They want back the territory lost in the '67 war. George Patterson Battle, n; A method of untying with the teeth a political knot that would not yield to the tongue. |
#333
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... They want back the territory lost in the '67 war. So it's not a reversal of conquest they seek. |
#334
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Of course, all that is about as relevant as Spain, Britian and France
making their claims on their respective parts of the US. Or the so-called "Native Americans" making their claims on the North American continent. Seems to me I read something about a "land bridge" from Asia? :-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#335
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Or the so-called "Native Americans" making their claims on the North American continent. Well Jay they are a **** of a lot more "Native" to America than your family will ever be. |
#336
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Barfs Again" wrote in message .. . Well Jay they are a **** of a lot more "Native" to America than your family will ever be. How so? |
#337
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Barfs Again" wrote in message .. . Jay Honeck wrote: Or the so-called "Native Americans" making their claims on the North American continent. Well Jay they are a **** of a lot more "Native" to America than your family will ever be. There is increasing evidence to the contrary. |
#338
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Or the so-called "Native Americans" making their claims on the North
American continent. Well Jay they are a **** of a lot more "Native" to America than your family will ever be. Really? My Mother's family traces their roots in North America back to the 18th century. Of course, they spoke French, and were in Canada at the time... How much older must my family get before we are considered "Native" to this continent? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#339
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Really? My Mother's family traces their roots in North America back to the 18th century. Of course, they spoke French, and were in Canada at the time... Well a rooty toot toot for you. So can my family..... In fact it can be traced back further than that to its European roots. But I would be hard pressed to look any Indian from Norther America in the eye and deny that their roots go back a hell of a lot longer than you or I could ever lay claim too. Just what American arrogance gives you the right to make the below quoted comment that you made just a few hours ago. Or the so-called "Native Americans" making their claims on the North American continent. They've been here for thousands of years Jay and we have been here for a few hundred. If they can't claim to be the true "Native American" then prey tell us all just what can they claim to be. |
#340
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Barfs Again" wrote in message ... If they can't claim to be the true "Native American" then prey tell us all just what can they claim to be. Anyone born in America is a native American. It matters not where your parents were born. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|