![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#371
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Hotze wrote:
ah well. I just jumped on another OT post. sorry. (And BTW you are not spaniard. Your roots are in central Europe, most likely in Germany.) ***sigh*** I know I'm jumping in late. But this is exactly the kind of thing which makes it so very difficult for Europe to ever be a totally united place. Rob |
#372
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Gottlieb" wrote:
"Dan Luke" wrote in message ... We are in a religious war. We didn't choose it, but we've got it. Really? Maybe we should take "separation of church and state" more seriously here and break that link. Say what you will about these people attacking us, but they are not stupid and they see the strong Christian leaning of the US government administration. What did they miss about the last US administration, that still got two embassies, a warship, and 17 sailors killed dead? You're making a red herring with that argument, Peter. Rob |
#373
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Dan Luke"
writes: "Wdtabor" wrote: But I am not trying to compare the relative worth of cultures, I am comparing results. Had the Amerindian culture rewarded knowledge and ambition as ours did, considering the vast resources thay had at their disposal, a successful culture would have been large and strong enough to resist us. So conquest and extermination of one culture by another is justified on the grounds that it's the conquered culture's fault for being weaker than the conqueror? There is a difference between something being justified and it's being inevitable. OK, let's look at it from a Democrat perspective. There are about 285 million people in the US, how about if the 2 million wealthiest buy up all the deeds and evict the other 283 million, keeping the entire country for themsleves as a giant hunting and fishing preserve. What about the 283million homeless, or the hundreds of millions of others around the world who will starve to death if the US agricultural bounty is converted to a big game park? Would you allow that now? Then why would it have been reasonable then? Those resources simply were not going to be wasted while people starved to death around the world. Had we not moved in, the Russians would have moved in from the northwest, or the Spanish from the south, or the French from Canada. It can certainly be said that there were unethical measures used in how the transition was made, but the simple truth is that Ameridian culture was doomed the moment navigational technology broke their isolation. Don -- Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS PP-ASEL Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG |
#374
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:
"Rosspilot" wrote in message ... Because it is a TACTIC, not an ENTITY. There is nothing to "wipe out". Tactics cannot be defeated? Not as such. The Anarchists of the late 19th Century used the same tactics to try and undo society. Rob |
#375
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank" wrote in message ... Depends..... If one believes they have a legitimate right to a country then the answer is obvious. They were given a country. Why do they need another one and why aren't the Jewish Palestinians entitled to one? If one believes otherwise, that is that Israel owns the land free and clear, then they must be fighting for equal rights as citizens. Israeli Arab citizens have rights equal with Israeli Jews. I don't know the answer, but as a simple test answer this question. Should a Palestinian be voting in an Israeli election or not. If not then where? How are you using the term Palestinian here? There is no Palestinian nationality, there never was. There are two nations that were created on the former Palestine Mandate, Israel and Jordan. All Israeli citizens, Arab and Jew, vote in Israeli elections. What nation, other than the US, allows non-citizens to vote in it's elections? |
#376
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#377
|
|||
|
|||
![]() S Green wrote: The only war the Americans have won on their own was the Civil War. Tell that to the Mexicans and Philipinos. George Patterson Battle, n; A method of untying with the teeth a political knot that would not yield to the tongue. |
#378
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#379
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wdtabor" wrote: ...There are about 285 million people in the US, how about if the 2 million wealthiest buy up all the deeds and evict the other 283 million, keeping the entire country for themsleves as a giant hunting and fishing preserve. What about the 283million homeless, or the hundreds of millions of others around the world who will starve to death if the US agricultural bounty is converted to a big game park? Would you allow that now? I would have thought a Libertarian would have no problem at all with this idea. In fact, it sounds very much like the Libertarian Party position on environmental protection. Those resources simply were not going to be wasted while people starved to death around the world. Had we not moved in, the Russians would have moved in from the northwest, or the Spanish from the south, or the French from Canada. So all of human history will be a series of violent resource grabs by overpopulated, aggressive nations? Don't you see rapidly diminishing opportunities for these kinds of grabs? What will the future be like if no human moral force restrains such naked plunder? We're running out of aborigines to evict. ...the simple truth is that Ameridian culture was doomed the moment navigational technology broke their isolation. Granted. Have you ever considered that the stupidest thing humans can possibly do is to attempt to establish contact with space-faring alien beings? "Hey! Conquistadors! We're over here!" -- Dan C172RG at BFM (remove pants to reply by email) |
#380
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I, for one, watched amazed how Bush threw incredibly feeble excuses
and lies to an astonishingly gullible public after 9/11. Noone I know could believe how stupid Mr. Bush had to be to think he could go away with such blatant lies. Yet he did... I feel truly sorry for the people who can't see beyond the propaganda machine, as obvious as it is. But I know there are a lot of people in the US who can see beyond, and a lot of very brave people who openly state their opposition. I feel sad because we are all victims of a lunatic who reached power through electoral fraud (which, in the US, is the ultimate irony) and is driving the world to a nightmare only to satisfy his and his friend's greed. That, and having the support of their gullible followers, who really believe Iraq was invaded because of Saddam or, worst yet, because of WMD or, worst even, because of some link with Al-Qaeda, is the saddest thing in the world. Please pack this drivel away, once and for all... How is GW getting rich on Iraq? How is it that the major nations of the world, the United Nations, and your patron saint, Bill Clinton, were all convinced that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, and publicly stated so before the war? (Not a huge leap of faith, given that Saddam ADMITTED to having them, and USED them on his own people.) How is it that the Supreme Court of our country -- packed, as it was, with Clinton appointees -- perpetrated an "electoral fraud" on us all? When are folks of your ilk going to realize that we actually, finally, for a brief moment in time, have a president who says what he means, means what he says, and doesn't back down because some ABC Pollster -- or foreign dignitary -- tells him that the folks in Newark or Paris don't agree with his positions? Personally, I do not agree with everything Bush does. However, if you're going to impugn the man's character, at least back it up with some logic and a few facts -- not just the left-wing's tired re-hash of old lies and innuendo. And, by the way...how 'bout that new Garmin G1000? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|