A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

December 6,1941



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old November 13th 03, 07:12 AM
Marc Reeve
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Keith Willshaw wrote:
"Bernardz" wrote in message
news:MPG.1a1cc45edfb975c29896ec@news...
In article , jdupre5762
@aol.com says...
I have often wondered. Given a 24 hour advanced notice that an attack
was eminent in 72 hours or less, what would have been the outcome at
Pearl Harbor? Say on dec 6, Pearl was given intel that an attack would
come anytime in the next 72 hours.

It might well have been worse in some ways. I understand that part of
the Navy's planning was to move the fleet out of the harbor to a
different anchorage that was much deeper. So if some of the ships
could have been torpedoed or sunk by bombs there they might well have
been unrecoverable.


The anchorage in question was off of Lahaina (Maui).

Were any of the ships that were recovered worth much anyway?


Hell yes, they were used throughout the later part of the war.


Mostly for pre-invasion bombardment. Which had effects that were
decidedly debatable. Did rattle the defenders' cages if nothing else.

Most of the effort that went into recovery was done for national pride
to deny the Japanese as much of a victory as possible.


Perhaps but do recall that the ships in the USN line at the battle
of the Surigao Strait, part of the largest naval battle of WW2
was made up of Battleships salvaged from Pearl Harbor.


Well, two "salvaged" (West Virginia and California) and three repaired
(Maryland and Tennessee were inboard of West Virginia & California,
Pennsylvania was already in drydock on 7 December).

Revenge was sweet that day.

Damn straight, even though it was a bit one-sided - six battleships
mounting a total of 58 large-caliber guns, vs. 1 battleship, 1 cruiser &
1 destroyer (the rest of the Southern Force had been taken out by
torpedo attacks from PT boats and destroyers.). The Battle Line opened
fire at 0353 and had pretty much obliterated the one Japanese battleship
by 0408, when the Cease Fire was passed. The cruiser (the eternally
battered Mogami) and destroyer retreated with heavy damage, only to be
sunk by aircraft the following morning.

(There, I got a military aviation reference in the last sentence.)

-Marc
--
Marc Reeve
actual email address after removal of 4s & spaces is
c4m4r4a4m4a4n a4t c4r4u4z4i4o d4o4t c4o4m
  #32  
Old November 13th 03, 08:23 AM
Bernardz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Most of the effort that went into recovery was done for national pride
to deny the Japanese as much of a victory as possible.


National pride was an important issue, but was the space needed to keep
the harbor open to refit and provision other ships? If battleship row
was unavailable, how many ships could Pearl Harbor support in a timely
fashion?


I doubt that they were worth the money.

They were used apparently a lot of money was spent on California, West
Virginia and Nevada. A lot was lost on the Oglala when she went down.

Bit of the Cassin and the Downes were put into new ships just to taunt
the Japanese.


my 0.02

MAH


--
People are not apathetic in a bookie shop.

13th saying of Bernard
  #33  
Old November 13th 03, 07:27 PM
David P Benjamin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Paul J. Adam ) wrote:
: In message ,
: Mike1 writes
: Carrier aircraft could have flown to land-based fields, refueled there,
: then attacked the Jap carriers as they approached.

: Consider how effective US aviation was against IJN forces in early 1942.
: No chance of a Midway Moment (catching carriers in the midst of a
: mission change), however bravely the USN crews try to press their
: attacks.

: Subs may have also have been able to intercept.

: And if they get to fire, and hit, so what? They're at the start of the
: learning curve of "why don't USN torpedoes work?" in December 1941.

Not to mention that USN practice against fleet units was to
fire on sonar indications. The realization that the IJN wasn't
really good at ASW would come later.


--
David Benjamin
  #34  
Old November 14th 03, 02:53 PM
Alan Minyard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:09:50 -0500, "James Linn" wrote:


"Mike1" wrote in message
...

(Resisting "But Roosevelt *did* know urge")

Watched a documentary on Camp X, a place east of Toronto that trained
British, Canadian and later US Intelligence types including SOE, OSS, FBI,
USNMI etc.

One of the functions of the Camp was also as a distant adjunct to Bletchley
Park. They interviewed a female operator who claims that the information
sent to the US officials in regards to Pearl Harbour was sent 8 days
previous to Dec 7, and stated that hostile action imminent, within 8
days(from memory). There was also some prediction that it would have been on
a Sunday.

Take that for whatever its worth. There is no proof that the warning got to
anyone in power.


James Linn

We knew that *something* was in the works, but everyone (including the Brits)
thought that the attack would come in the PI, the Dutch East Indies, etc. No
one foresaw the attack on Pearl.

Al Minyard

  #36  
Old November 16th 03, 11:46 AM
Drazen Kramaric
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 16:57:14 -0600, BOB URZ
wrote:

I have often wondered. Given a 24 hour advanced notice that an attack
was eminent in 72 hours or less, what would have been the outcome at
Pearl Harbor? Say on dec 6, Pearl was given intel that an attack would
come anytime in the next 72 hours.


If Japanese found out Americans were ready three days before the
attack was scheduled, Nagumo was under order to abort the mission.


Drax
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kitplanes December - Roger Home Built 0 November 19th 04 09:10 AM
Kitplanes December Dale Home Built 11 November 17th 04 07:13 PM
Long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids (was: #1 Jet of World War II) The Revolution Will Not Be Televised Military Aviation 20 August 27th 03 09:14 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.