If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
PowerFLARM Mode S question
On 10/24/2010 1:03 PM, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Oct 24, 7:51 am, Mike wrote: On 10/24/2010 8:51 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote: On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 19:03:15 -0400, Mike Schumann wrote: Over what period of time? All at once, presumably. Just now (5:45 AM PDT) I looked at Flight Radar 24http://www.flightradar24.com/and saw 4 aircraft near Portland and 3 near LA. So much for the assertion that ADS-B is far off into the future. -- Mike Schumann And a few airliners flying around today with 1090ES data-out (and not integrated with most ATC services yet) somehow changes what has been said here by anybody? Its exactly consistent. ADS-B is coming. I've stated the situation as best as I know it with ADS-B adoption. If you can add anything cogent to that discussion speak up. You are looking at airliners. As I've said here already - airliners out of Europe are very likely to have 1090ES data-out. New airliners in the USA are very likely to have 1090ES data-out. Some airlines and freight carriers are likely to adopt earlier because they start to see benefits like in-trail separation and sequencing or just because they are interested in exploring the capability to do that in future. On the other hand for GA and gliders there is very little incentive to adopt ADS-B data-out, its expensive and the recent STC requirement is a significant barrier. Significant enough that I suspect it just stopped GA ADS-B upgrades cold for a while (outside locations where there is a clear benefit like GOMEX and a oil industry helicopter fleet that can pay for it). And we are still a few years away from extensive ground station coverage with full ADS-B services (full roll out of critical services at TRACON/approach locations, not just the enroute essential services rolling out now in most places). And even when there service is fully rolled out there it looks like there will be poor coverage in many important glider locations. So all we can say is (unless the wheels fall off ADS-B) there will be widespread carriage of ADS-B data-out by 2020. Where widespread means all the big guys and installed at least in GA aircraft that fly where they require transponders today. And all the big guys will be 1090ES data-out and what GA adopts we'll have to wait and see (but I expect much more 1090ES data-out than the FAA seemed to ever expect). I assume you have the ability to find out what current UAT adoption is around some locations. That would be interesting to know. Nobody I can find from AOPA, NBAA, avionics industry organizations etc. seems to have any predictions for ADS-B fleet adoption rates. I would certainly not assume aggressive roll-out of ADS-B data-out in GA aircraft--because of the current STC hurdle, the costs and lack of benefits (that AOPA and EAA and others are pretty clear of in their criticisms of ADS-B). And back to gliders... there seems no way that certified gliders can install any ADS-B data-out today because of the lack of STC approval. So its largely academic right now for many of us if a product is FCC and TSO approved if there is no STC for installation on type. If you want to keep saying that certain UAT transceivers are available now you need to qualify that would be for experimental gliders only or let us know who is working on the install STC and for what gliders. Darryl The reality is that the big short term opportunity with ADS-B is TIS-B. If you are within range of an ADS-B ground station, you will be able to see not just other ADS-B equipped aircraft, but all other Mode C / S transponder equipped aircraft that are visible to ATC. The ground station rollout is moving ahead briskly. I was told that MSP's ground station is live as of September. Most people flying gliders near major metropolitan areas will be within range of an ADS-B ground station. With an ADS-B transceiver (UAT or 1090ES), you will be able to see all airliners, and also most GA aircraft. In addition, ATC will be able to see you just like you had a transponder. This may not help people flying gliders in remote areas at low altitudes, but it will be a huge plus for most recreational glider pilots. The challenge is to come up with a low cost ADS-B transceiver package that is acceptable, both from a cost, size, and functional perspective, to the glider community. PowerFlarm, if, and only if, it is coupled with an active ADS-B Out transmitter may be the best approach. There will surely be others that are aimed at the GA market, which being much larger than the glider market, will hopefully be more cost effective. -- Mike Schumann |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
PowerFLARM Mode S question
On Oct 24, 2:24*pm, Mike Schumann
wrote: The reality is that the big short term opportunity with ADS-B is TIS-B. * If you are within range of an ADS-B ground station, you will be able to see not just other ADS-B equipped aircraft, but all other Mode C / S transponder equipped aircraft that are visible to ATC. Wrong. Not unless *you* have ADS-B out. Please read: http://www.gliderpilot.org/FLARM-Abo...nders-And-ADSB Now, go back and read it again, this time carefully. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
PowerFLARM Mode S question
On 10/24/2010 6:14 PM, Dave Nadler wrote:
On Oct 24, 2:24 pm, Mike wrote: The reality is that the big short term opportunity with ADS-B is TIS-B. If you are within range of an ADS-B ground station, you will be able to see not just other ADS-B equipped aircraft, but all other Mode C / S transponder equipped aircraft that are visible to ATC. Wrong. Not unless *you* have ADS-B out. Please read: http://www.gliderpilot.org/FLARM-Abo...nders-And-ADSB Now, go back and read it again, this time carefully. How about fully reading my post? I indicated you needed an ADS-B "transceiver", not a "receiver". I also indicated that PowerFlarm might provide TIS-B services only if it was coupled with an ADS-B Out transmitter. -- Mike Schumann |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
PowerFLARM Mode S question
On Oct 24, 7:06*pm, Mike Schumann
wrote: On 10/24/2010 6:14 PM, Dave Nadler wrote: On Oct 24, 2:24 pm, Mike wrote: The reality is that the big short term opportunity with ADS-B is TIS-B.. * *If you are within range of an ADS-B ground station, you will be able to see not just other ADS-B equipped aircraft, but all other Mode C / S transponder equipped aircraft that are visible to ATC. Wrong. Not unless *you* have ADS-B out. Please read: http://www.gliderpilot.org/FLARM-Abo...nders-And-ADSB Now, go back and read it again, this time carefully. How about fully reading my post? *I indicated you needed an ADS-B "transceiver", not a "receiver". *I also indicated that PowerFlarm might provide TIS-B services only if it was coupled with an ADS-B Out transmitter. -- Mike Schumann Oh, so you're suggesting something that DOES NOT EXIST FOR GLIDERS ? |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
PowerFLARM Mode S question
On 10/24/2010 7:56 PM, Dave Nadler wrote:
On Oct 24, 7:06 pm, Mike wrote: On 10/24/2010 6:14 PM, Dave Nadler wrote: On Oct 24, 2:24 pm, Mike wrote: The reality is that the big short term opportunity with ADS-B is TIS-B. If you are within range of an ADS-B ground station, you will be able to see not just other ADS-B equipped aircraft, but all other Mode C / S transponder equipped aircraft that are visible to ATC. Wrong. Not unless *you* have ADS-B out. Please read: http://www.gliderpilot.org/FLARM-Abo...nders-And-ADSB Now, go back and read it again, this time carefully. How about fully reading my post? I indicated you needed an ADS-B "transceiver", not a "receiver". I also indicated that PowerFlarm might provide TIS-B services only if it was coupled with an ADS-B Out transmitter. -- Mike Schumann Oh, so you're suggesting something that DOES NOT EXIST FOR GLIDERS ? Navworx exists. PowerFlarm does not. You can hook up Navworx to a variety of GPS units to graphically see aircraft in your vicinity. You might not like the cost, power consumption or the selection of display devices that are supported, but it will work in a glider and it will show you the accurate position and altitude all of the other transponder equipped aircraft in your area if you are within range of an ADS-B ground station. If you want to accurately and reliably see GA and jet aircraft and you operate in an area that has ADS-B ground station coverage, an ADS-B based solution will give you the most accurate information, but ONLY if you are also transmitting an ADS-B out signal. -- Mike Schumann |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
PowerFLARM Mode S question
On 10/24/2010 7:10 AM, Mike Schumann wrote:
I think it's pretty clear - Mike admits that when PowerFlarm gets FCC approval he will unequivocally support it as the optimal solution for gliders. His arguments to-date have been uniformly based on PowarFlarm's pending approval. Mike, are you going to change your argument or be consistent? 9B When the product is FCC approved, and you can get a datasheet and a manual then we can have a discussion on the pluses and minuses. I am open minded to any solution that not only addresses glider on glider threats, but also glider / GA and glider / airliners threats. It's not like PowerFlarm is a completely new, untested concept, or that the people bringing it to market are unknown ciphers. They've done this before, to the tune of 10,000+ installations, and it's reasonable to assume they'll do it again, so there is simply no point not to have the discussion NOW. Your recalcitrance on this makes you look very unreasonable, and casts doubt your arguments, deserved or not. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "Transponders in Sailplanes - Feb/2010" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarm http://tinyurl.com/yb3xywl - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation Mar/2004" Much of what you need to know tinyurl.com/yfs7tnz |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
PowerFLARM Mode S question
On Oct 24, 6:50*pm, Mike Schumann
wrote: On 10/24/2010 7:56 PM, Dave Nadler wrote: On Oct 24, 7:06 pm, Mike wrote: On 10/24/2010 6:14 PM, Dave Nadler wrote: On Oct 24, 2:24 pm, Mike wrote: The reality is that the big short term opportunity with ADS-B is TIS-B. * * If you are within range of an ADS-B ground station, you will be able to see not just other ADS-B equipped aircraft, but all other Mode C / S transponder equipped aircraft that are visible to ATC. Wrong. Not unless *you* have ADS-B out. Please read: http://www.gliderpilot.org/FLARM-Abo...nders-And-ADSB Now, go back and read it again, this time carefully. How about fully reading my post? *I indicated you needed an ADS-B "transceiver", not a "receiver". *I also indicated that PowerFlarm might provide TIS-B services only if it was coupled with an ADS-B Out transmitter. -- Mike Schumann Oh, so you're suggesting something that DOES NOT EXIST FOR GLIDERS ? Navworx exists. *PowerFlarm does not. You can hook up Navworx to a variety of GPS units to graphically see aircraft in your vicinity. *You might not like the cost, power consumption or the selection of display devices that are supported, but it will work in a glider and it will show you the accurate position and altitude all of the other transponder equipped aircraft in your area if you are within range of an ADS-B ground station. If you want to accurately and reliably see GA and jet aircraft and you operate in an area that has ADS-B ground station coverage, an ADS-B based solution will give you the most accurate information, but ONLY if you are also transmitting an ADS-B out signal. -- Mike Schumann On Oct 24, 6:50 pm, Mike Schumann wrote: On 10/24/2010 7:56 PM, Dave Nadler wrote: On Oct 24, 7:06 pm, Mike wrote: On 10/24/2010 6:14 PM, Dave Nadler wrote: On Oct 24, 2:24 pm, Mike wrote: The reality is that the big short term opportunity with ADS-B is TIS-B. If you are within range of an ADS-B ground station, you will be able to see not just other ADS-B equipped aircraft, but all other Mode C / S transponder equipped aircraft that are visible to ATC. Wrong. Not unless *you* have ADS-B out. Please read: http://www.gliderpilot.org/FLARM-Abo...nders-And-ADSB Now, go back and read it again, this time carefully. How about fully reading my post? I indicated you needed an ADS-B "transceiver", not a "receiver". I also indicated that PowerFlarm might provide TIS-B services only if it was coupled with an ADS-B Out transmitter. -- Mike Schumann Oh, so you're suggesting something that DOES NOT EXIST FOR GLIDERS ? Navworx exists. PowerFlarm does not. You can hook up Navworx to a variety of GPS units to graphically see aircraft in your vicinity. You might not like the cost, power consumption or the selection of display devices that are supported, but it will work in a glider and it will show you the accurate position and altitude all of the other transponder equipped aircraft in your area if you are within range of an ADS-B ground station. If you want to accurately and reliably see GA and jet aircraft and you operate in an area that has ADS-B ground station coverage, an ADS-B based solution will give you the most accurate information, but ONLY if you are also transmitting an ADS-B out signal. -- Mike Schumann Again the devil is in the details. Where is the STC that allows a NavWorx ADS600-B to be installed in a certified glider to comply with the new FAA STC requirements announced this August? (yes an experiential glider can get away without this). The NavWorx ADS600-B transceiver is TSO as a UAT transceiver but its built in GPS source does not meet the TSO-C145/C146 WAAS GPS requirements to drive ADS-B data-out for the 2020 carriage mandate. The NavWorx products were intended to have one of these higher end GPS systems connected to it to meet the full 2020 carriage mandates for powered aircraft but be usable now without that (which could easily double or more their cost today and increase power consumption). And that certainly seemed a good idea (and still doable for experimental aircraft) but it looks like the FAA may have other ideas for certified aircraft... since the FAA recently instituted this new STC requirement it is not clear to me whether the FAA has any intention of allowing STC approval for an install that does not meet the 2020 carriage mandate requirements. And even if gliders were not otherwise required to meet those GPS requirements. I've just about given up trying to navigate this FAA mess, but then I'm not pushing people to adopt ADS-B data-out now -- but Mike you are so maybe you can explain this actual situation here. Will the FAA allow a STC to be developed for install in a glider with a non-TSO-C145/C146 WAAS GPS? And who is funding the development of that STC for installation of a NavWorx ADS600-B UAT in a certified glider? Which gliders? Or any idea when the FAA plans to drop the STC requirement and allow field approval/337 installs? TIS-B will likely work well where there will be good GBT (ADS-B base station) and radar coverage and with classic GA style aircraft separation. But there won't be TIS-B coverage in many critical areas such as many GA airport traffic patterns and other areas where I worry about GA traffic - again that's not an overall slight on TIS-B but pilots need to look at this coverage where they fly and be aware as well when the TIS-B support is rolling out for their en-route (pretty soon for most people) and approach/TRACON radar coverage (now for a very few, over the next few years for most). If you just fly a glider like a GA aircraft and never fly close to other glider etc. then things are simpler, but most of us end up flying in ways that cause some specific traffic display/threat warning challenges. Again this UAT solution relies on a third party display/ warning system that processes data from the UAT transceiver. That system likely needs to be optimized/designed for the type of flying gliders do, and the applies to TIS-B data as well. To see why... consider the case of flying within a short distance of other gliders who are transponder equipped. This is not necessarily in the same thermal, it could be a fraction of a mile or so away. But there is more uncertainty with a SSR derived location data pumped through TIS-B than there is with a GPS location based ADS-B direct or ADS-R (relay) signal. Just how the traffic display/threat warning system handles that situation might be critical but its may be something that only somebody designing a system for gliders will worry about. In many cases when a TIS-B based systems sees your glider buddy getting close the best it may be be able to do is just throw up it hands and say "threat nearby at altitude xxxx" it won't be able to give direction data. And you don't want it to keep false warning you about your glider buddies so you want some way to suppress that warning unless they get really close (hopefully with an altitude and range margins you can set) and an easy way to suppress recurring warnings and you want those settings separate for TIS-B than ADS-B direct/ADS-R. The devil again, is in the details. Who is going to get this right for UAT traffic display/threat warning for a glider cockpit? I believe that TIS-B is a useful add-on service for some GA folks who can afford it and fly in the right areas. I'm more dubious that is is financially justified in gliders now. This stuff may be interesting to pilots if they can manage to legally install a UAT transceiver and third party display/processor system, afford the thousands of dollars purchase and install cost (could be over $5k or more with TSO GPS and all the STC driven costs?), can power the system (over 1 amp with display and TSO complaint GPS) and they need to check out that traffic display/threat processing system indeed will meet the needs of their glider cockpit/flying environment. Mike if these things are here now and do TIS-B so well to solve the GA traffic concerns you have mentioned so the obvious question is have you purchased a NavWorx ADS600-Receiver? How have you legally installed it in your glider? What traffic/display hardware are you using and how well does it handle things like TIS-B when flying near and thermalling with transponder equipped gliders or other UAT equipped gliders? Seems like a research project not a product ready to sell (to the glider market) to me. Darryl |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
PowerFLARM Mode S question
On Oct 24, 9:50*pm, Mike Schumann
wrote: Navworx exists. *PowerFlarm does not. You can hook up Navworx to a variety of GPS units to graphically see aircraft in your vicinity. *You might not like the cost, power consumption or the selection of display devices that are supported, but it will work in a glider and it will show you the accurate position and altitude all of the other transponder equipped aircraft in your area if you are within range of an ADS-B ground station. -- Mike Schumann WRONG Too much power. No STCs. Too expensive. No effective collision warning. === DOES NOT EXIST FOR GLIDERS === QED |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
PowerFLARM Mode S question
On 10/25/2010 12:46 AM, Eric Greenwell wrote:
On 10/24/2010 7:10 AM, Mike Schumann wrote: I think it's pretty clear - Mike admits that when PowerFlarm gets FCC approval he will unequivocally support it as the optimal solution for gliders. His arguments to-date have been uniformly based on PowarFlarm's pending approval. Mike, are you going to change your argument or be consistent? 9B When the product is FCC approved, and you can get a datasheet and a manual then we can have a discussion on the pluses and minuses. I am open minded to any solution that not only addresses glider on glider threats, but also glider / GA and glider / airliners threats. It's not like PowerFlarm is a completely new, untested concept, or that the people bringing it to market are unknown ciphers. They've done this before, to the tune of 10,000+ installations, and it's reasonable to assume they'll do it again, so there is simply no point not to have the discussion NOW. Your recalcitrance on this makes you look very unreasonable, and casts doubt your arguments, deserved or not. I'm not opposed to having a discussion about future products. I've participated in these before. My objection is in misrepresenting future products as things that currently exist, while simultaneously disparaging products that currently do exist as being "future" products. -- Mike Schumann |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
PowerFLARM Mode S question
On 10/25/2010 1:52 AM, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Oct 24, 6:50 pm, Mike wrote: On 10/24/2010 7:56 PM, Dave Nadler wrote: On Oct 24, 7:06 pm, Mike wrote: On 10/24/2010 6:14 PM, Dave Nadler wrote: On Oct 24, 2:24 pm, Mike wrote: The reality is that the big short term opportunity with ADS-B is TIS-B. If you are within range of an ADS-B ground station, you will be able to see not just other ADS-B equipped aircraft, but all other Mode C / S transponder equipped aircraft that are visible to ATC. Wrong. Not unless *you* have ADS-B out. Please read: http://www.gliderpilot.org/FLARM-Abo...nders-And-ADSB Now, go back and read it again, this time carefully. How about fully reading my post? I indicated you needed an ADS-B "transceiver", not a "receiver". I also indicated that PowerFlarm might provide TIS-B services only if it was coupled with an ADS-B Out transmitter. -- Mike Schumann Oh, so you're suggesting something that DOES NOT EXIST FOR GLIDERS ? Navworx exists. PowerFlarm does not. You can hook up Navworx to a variety of GPS units to graphically see aircraft in your vicinity. You might not like the cost, power consumption or the selection of display devices that are supported, but it will work in a glider and it will show you the accurate position and altitude all of the other transponder equipped aircraft in your area if you are within range of an ADS-B ground station. If you want to accurately and reliably see GA and jet aircraft and you operate in an area that has ADS-B ground station coverage, an ADS-B based solution will give you the most accurate information, but ONLY if you are also transmitting an ADS-B out signal. -- Mike Schumann On Oct 24, 6:50 pm, Mike wrote: On 10/24/2010 7:56 PM, Dave Nadler wrote: On Oct 24, 7:06 pm, Mike wrote: On 10/24/2010 6:14 PM, Dave Nadler wrote: On Oct 24, 2:24 pm, Mike wrote: The reality is that the big short term opportunity with ADS-B is TIS-B. If you are within range of an ADS-B ground station, you will be able to see not just other ADS-B equipped aircraft, but all other Mode C / S transponder equipped aircraft that are visible to ATC. Wrong. Not unless *you* have ADS-B out. Please read: http://www.gliderpilot.org/FLARM-Abo...nders-And-ADSB Now, go back and read it again, this time carefully. How about fully reading my post? I indicated you needed an ADS-B "transceiver", not a "receiver". I also indicated that PowerFlarm might provide TIS-B services only if it was coupled with an ADS-B Out transmitter. -- Mike Schumann Oh, so you're suggesting something that DOES NOT EXIST FOR GLIDERS ? Navworx exists. PowerFlarm does not. You can hook up Navworx to a variety of GPS units to graphically see aircraft in your vicinity. You might not like the cost, power consumption or the selection of display devices that are supported, but it will work in a glider and it will show you the accurate position and altitude all of the other transponder equipped aircraft in your area if you are within range of an ADS-B ground station. If you want to accurately and reliably see GA and jet aircraft and you operate in an area that has ADS-B ground station coverage, an ADS-B based solution will give you the most accurate information, but ONLY if you are also transmitting an ADS-B out signal. -- Mike Schumann Again the devil is in the details. Where is the STC that allows a NavWorx ADS600-B to be installed in a certified glider to comply with the new FAA STC requirements announced this August? (yes an experiential glider can get away without this). The NavWorx ADS600-B transceiver is TSO as a UAT transceiver but its built in GPS source does not meet the TSO-C145/C146 WAAS GPS requirements to drive ADS-B data-out for the 2020 carriage mandate. The NavWorx products were intended to have one of these higher end GPS systems connected to it to meet the full 2020 carriage mandates for powered aircraft but be usable now without that (which could easily double or more their cost today and increase power consumption). And that certainly seemed a good idea (and still doable for experimental aircraft) but it looks like the FAA may have other ideas for certified aircraft... since the FAA recently instituted this new STC requirement it is not clear to me whether the FAA has any intention of allowing STC approval for an install that does not meet the 2020 carriage mandate requirements. And even if gliders were not otherwise required to meet those GPS requirements. I've just about given up trying to navigate this FAA mess, but then I'm not pushing people to adopt ADS-B data-out now -- but Mike you are so maybe you can explain this actual situation here. Will the FAA allow a STC to be developed for install in a glider with a non-TSO-C145/C146 WAAS GPS? And who is funding the development of that STC for installation of a NavWorx ADS600-B UAT in a certified glider? Which gliders? Or any idea when the FAA plans to drop the STC requirement and allow field approval/337 installs? TIS-B will likely work well where there will be good GBT (ADS-B base station) and radar coverage and with classic GA style aircraft separation. But there won't be TIS-B coverage in many critical areas such as many GA airport traffic patterns and other areas where I worry about GA traffic - again that's not an overall slight on TIS-B but pilots need to look at this coverage where they fly and be aware as well when the TIS-B support is rolling out for their en-route (pretty soon for most people) and approach/TRACON radar coverage (now for a very few, over the next few years for most). If you just fly a glider like a GA aircraft and never fly close to other glider etc. then things are simpler, but most of us end up flying in ways that cause some specific traffic display/threat warning challenges. Again this UAT solution relies on a third party display/ warning system that processes data from the UAT transceiver. That system likely needs to be optimized/designed for the type of flying gliders do, and the applies to TIS-B data as well. To see why... consider the case of flying within a short distance of other gliders who are transponder equipped. This is not necessarily in the same thermal, it could be a fraction of a mile or so away. But there is more uncertainty with a SSR derived location data pumped through TIS-B than there is with a GPS location based ADS-B direct or ADS-R (relay) signal. Just how the traffic display/threat warning system handles that situation might be critical but its may be something that only somebody designing a system for gliders will worry about. In many cases when a TIS-B based systems sees your glider buddy getting close the best it may be be able to do is just throw up it hands and say "threat nearby at altitude xxxx" it won't be able to give direction data. And you don't want it to keep false warning you about your glider buddies so you want some way to suppress that warning unless they get really close (hopefully with an altitude and range margins you can set) and an easy way to suppress recurring warnings and you want those settings separate for TIS-B than ADS-B direct/ADS-R. The devil again, is in the details. Who is going to get this right for UAT traffic display/threat warning for a glider cockpit? I believe that TIS-B is a useful add-on service for some GA folks who can afford it and fly in the right areas. I'm more dubious that is is financially justified in gliders now. This stuff may be interesting to pilots if they can manage to legally install a UAT transceiver and third party display/processor system, afford the thousands of dollars purchase and install cost (could be over $5k or more with TSO GPS and all the STC driven costs?), can power the system (over 1 amp with display and TSO complaint GPS) and they need to check out that traffic display/threat processing system indeed will meet the needs of their glider cockpit/flying environment. Mike if these things are here now and do TIS-B so well to solve the GA traffic concerns you have mentioned so the obvious question is have you purchased a NavWorx ADS600-Receiver? How have you legally installed it in your glider? What traffic/display hardware are you using and how well does it handle things like TIS-B when flying near and thermalling with transponder equipped gliders or other UAT equipped gliders? Seems like a research project not a product ready to sell (to the glider market) to me. Darryl From what I see on the Navworx web site, the ADS600-B is NOT TSO'd, even though it is FCC approved. I'm don't claim to be an expert on FAA issues regarding installation of equipment in aircraft, so I have no idea what that means. I suspect that the current non TSO'd Navworx box will not meet the 2020 ADS-B rule. I suspect that you could install it in a certified glider as a portable device, like you would a Garmin 496, without any trouble (FAA trouble that is). However, the unit obviously doesn't look like it was designed for this. I don't know what the ramifications are of a permanent install. You are certainly correct that installation of this kind of equipment in a glider (or any aircraft), at this stage of the product / regulatory life cycle should be treated as a research project. The same applies to PowerFlarm when it initially starts shipping. -- Mike Schumann |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Build your own PowerFLARM! | Darryl Ramm | Soaring | 51 | August 19th 10 06:39 PM |
KDR-510 question (VDL Mode 2 receiver?) | Filip Zawadiak | Owning | 0 | June 30th 04 04:16 PM |
KDR-510 question (VDL Mode 2 receiver?) | Filip Zawadiak | Piloting | 0 | June 30th 04 04:16 PM |
KDR-510 question (VDL Mode 2 receiver?) | Filip Zawadiak | Products | 0 | June 30th 04 04:16 PM |
Question on missing Mode-C | Ray Bengen | Owning | 10 | March 2nd 04 11:59 PM |