![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Quit bitching and go be "self-employed", that's what your should do. It's
the mature alternative. NOT if he doesn't like working for free!!!! |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]() However, the topic needs to be discussed. There appear to be a number of deluded individuals that think being forced to work without pay is a good thing. Personally, I think it is theft and, at bottom, an offense as serious as murder. As are the unaccounted for personal calls and 10-minute "unofficial" breaks that everyone takes on the boss's dime. Asking an employee to work over isn't theft. It's a request. Forcing an *hourly* employee to work off the clock isn't a good thing. But if your wanting to show your "work ethic" and your willingness to do whatever it takes to get the job done, then it can endear you to the people who write your check (creating more opportunity for advancement, etc). Become a clock watcher on me and I'll become one on you. ....stuff clipped here.... When they refuse to shovel the walk to the air terminal, does that mean they have no more team spirit? No, but it does show your priorities. I'm only interested in employees who care about the company (and thereby their jobs). Refusing to do something that is necessary for the company's survival makes no sense to me. Do it and move on. Now, if that "something" becomes an everyday thing, then there is a problem in the company. The occasional "free" hour helps everyone. Not the way your union steward will see it, but then again.....screw the union. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... snip I think it is theft and, at bottom, an offense as serious as murder. snip trolling deep today ...... |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff Franks" wrote in message ... When they refuse to shovel the walk to the air terminal, does that mean they have no more team spirit? No, but it does show your priorities. I'm only interested in employees who care about the company (and thereby their jobs). Refusing to do something that is necessary for the company's survival makes no sense to me. It's like you said, and it's also customer service. If my students can't get into the building without getting their feet wet because the walks aren't shoveled they may end up going somewhere else, which would also be my loss. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ron Natalie" wrote in message . .. "Tom S." wrote in message ... "Ron Natalie" wrote in message . .. Indeed. But it depends on one's definition of "compensation". If he gets hours out of it, I'm curious how your IRS would account for that -- a non-cash remuneration. It's only the FAA that thinks that intangible job experiece is renumeration. They got it from the IRS and their version of "Wages and Salaries" (not what the 16th originally defined). Nope, the IRS doesn't hold that "job experience" is taxable. But evidently the FAA does :~) Where'd they get that notion, huh? |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... "John Gaquin" wrote in message ... | | "Bob Dole" wrote in message | | Has anyone else noticed ? ------ | | While numerous responders shoot off in multiple directions, expounding on | everything from moral work ethic to the oppression of the proletariat, our | original troll, Mr. "Bob Dole" chooses only to sit back and watch the show. However, the topic needs to be discussed. There appear to be a number of deluded individuals that think being forced to work without pay is a good thing. Personally, I think it is theft and, at bottom, an offense as serious as murder. "Forced"? Someone is holding a gun on them? Holding their family hostage? |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 13:52:39 -0700, "Tom S." wrote
in Message-Id: : "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... "John Gaquin" wrote in message ... | | "Bob Dole" wrote in message | | Has anyone else noticed ? ------ | | While numerous responders shoot off in multiple directions, expounding on | everything from moral work ethic to the oppression of the proletariat, our | original troll, Mr. "Bob Dole" chooses only to sit back and watch the show. However, the topic needs to be discussed. There appear to be a number of deluded individuals that think being forced to work without pay is a good thing. Personally, I think it is theft and, at bottom, an offense as serious as murder. "Forced"? Someone is holding a gun on them? Holding their family hostage? Is a women employee asked by her boss to perform sexual acts to keep her job being coerced? |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"C J Campbell" wrote in message ...
However, the topic needs to be discussed. There appear to be a number of deluded individuals that think being forced to work without pay is a good thing. Personally, I think it is theft and, at bottom, an offense as serious as murder. You have GOT to be kidding. Please get a grip, CJ, and develop a few more nuances in your sense of perspective. One wonders: why all these people willing to put up with such conditions? They think that if they just build enough hours or 'pay their dues' that they will eventually get a decent paying job. Precisely. And when they do start demanding to be paid, does that mean that they have lost their work ethic? It means they have decided that their long-term goals are no longer being served by their short-term deprivations. If everyone in the profession pretty much feels the same way, things will change. If there's a line of people with the same qualifications out the door and around the block who are willing to deal with the status quo working conditions, the polite employer's response will be "good luck in your future endeavors, don't let the door hit you on the way out" It's called supply-and-demand in the free market, and while it's not pretty sometimes I haven't heard of a better system yet. Sydney |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gary Mishler" wrote in message news:Ewbsb.172027$HS4.1394008@attbi_s01...
"Jeff Franks" wrote in message ... No, but it does show your priorities. I'm only interested in employees who care about the company (and thereby their jobs). Refusing to do something that is necessary for the company's survival makes no sense to me. It's like you said, and it's also customer service. If my students can't get into the building without getting their feet wet because the walks aren't shoveled they may end up going somewhere else, which would also be my loss. True story. It doesn't snow that much in St Louis, and when it does snow, it usually only lasts a couple days before melting off. So people and businesses don't make the same level of arrangements to cope as people in colder climes must. When I was a student pilot at a local flight school, we had a cold snap following a reasonably substantial snow. A week after the snowfall, snow was still on the ground. I went out to the airport to fly. The planes were still covered with snow. The ramps surrounding the planes were plowed, but snow had been pushed up so that it formed a barrier to pulling each plane out. A number of CFIs were sitting around a table inside, kvetching about how they weren't flying and hence weren't earning money. Now I guess snow removal wasn't in their job description. But if they'd all pitched in and shoveled the snow off the planes, put the first planes on the schedule inside the heated hangars to warm up, called the airport authority to plow the cleared section of the ramp clean then moved other planes and gotten the rest of the ramp plowed, they could have been flying (and earning money) all week. And honey, I'm from Western New York and I've shoveled snow in my time. I coulda got that whole ramp clean by myself in 3 days with only a shovel. Half a dozen strapping and healthy young fellows and a tractor with a plow on it, 3 hrs max. They lost. Their employer lost, and ultimately went out of business. I guess sometimes it's better to avoid working for free sometimes than to keep working at all. Sydney |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Quite a rant, CJ. Get a grip.
"C J Campbell" wrote in message ....I think it is theft and, at bottom, an offense as serious as murder. One of the more patently ridiculous statements I've seen in a newsgroup. Or do you think that they will just continue being willing to fly 747s on international routes for free just to build up hours? CFIs already work harder than that. And what does international have to do with it? People always throw that in, like its five times harder to cross a boundary or something. Silly. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
Associate Publisher Wanted - Aviation & Business Journals | Mergatroide | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | January 13th 04 08:26 PM |
Associate Publisher Wanted - Aviation & Business Journals | Mergatroide | General Aviation | 1 | January 13th 04 08:26 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |