A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NOTAM



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old August 28th 04, 11:51 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ash Wyllie" wrote

It's going to be a close election. If the SS shoots enough of the right
people
the outcaom could be changed.



-ash
Cthulhu for President!
Why vote for a lesser evil?

Starting with you? g
--
Jim in NC


  #32  
Old August 28th 04, 01:20 PM
Bob Kaplow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Martin X. Moleski, SJ" writes:
"Ignorance of the law is no excuse" (that I know of). Folks in the
Academy of Model Aeronautics are doing what they can to get
the word out, but lots of RC pilots are not AMA members.
There is no obligation to be a member in order to fly on private
property or wherever permission is granted by the owner(s).


.... or to fly on PUBLIC property regardless of what the AMA thinks...

Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD"
To reply, remove the TRABoD!

Kaplow Klips & Baffle: http://nira-rocketry.org/LeadingEdge/Phantom4000.pdf
www.encompasserve.org/~kaplow_r/ www.nira-rocketry.org www.nar.org

Save Model Rocketry from the HSA! http://www.space-rockets.com/congress.html
  #33  
Old August 28th 04, 03:08 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Martin X. Moleski, SJ" wrote in message
...

"Ignorance of the law is no excuse" (that I know of).


But if you're arrested and are ignorant of your right to remain silent, and
the cops fail to make you aware of that right, you walk.


  #35  
Old August 28th 04, 03:42 PM
Martin X. Moleski, SJ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 03:25:39 GMT, "G.R. Patterson III"
wrote:

I used to fly from a baseball diamond. They're gonna close that?


It depends on what you're flying and how much the local
enforcers want to crack down.

When I picture a confrontation between me and the cops,
I picture myself doing whatever they tell me to do, all things
being equal. I understand that other people are made of
sterner stuff and enjoy fighting with armed officers more
than I do. (

Marty
  #36  
Old August 28th 04, 03:47 PM
Martin X. Moleski, SJ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 03:18:20 GMT, "G.R. Patterson III"
wrote:

I wonder if some of the HSA people saw posts similar to the model B-52 posts that
were going around in this group recently and took some of the humorous comments
seriously.


I hope that someone is thinking about what can be done with RPVs.

I know that the Academy of Model Aeronautics is worried about them.

I hope that some resolution can be reached that will allow the
innocent to continue enjoying a great hobby while the guilty are
detected and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

One non-religious Muslim in our group has already been visited
by the FBI. It was a cordial visit spurred by Erol's purchase of
two quarts of hydrochloric acid from an auto store (if I remember
correctly). They were on his doorstep later that day. He was
using the acid to anodize some aluminum parts. He answered
the door wearing a T-shirt with some nuclear symbols on it
from his day job at a nuclear research center. I imagine it was
a little tense at first, but he's laughing about it now.

Marty
  #37  
Old August 28th 04, 04:27 PM
Bill Denton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tangential correction...

You probably will not walk, but whatever you say without benefit of council
will probably not be admissible at your trial.



"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Martin X. Moleski, SJ" wrote in message
...

"Ignorance of the law is no excuse" (that I know of).


But if you're arrested and are ignorant of your right to remain silent,

and
the cops fail to make you aware of that right, you walk.




  #38  
Old August 28th 04, 04:44 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Bill Denton wrote:

You probably will not walk, but whatever you say without benefit of council
will probably not be admissible at your trial.


Even if you do walk, you will be a much poorer individual. A competent attorney will
charge a contingency fee of several thousand just to handle a felony charge. If it
gets before a jury, you'll be into the tens of thousands.

George Patterson
If you want to know God's opinion of money, just look at the people
he gives it to.
  #39  
Old August 28th 04, 05:38 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Martin X. Moleski, SJ" wrote in message
...

It seems to me that flying is not a right; it is a privilege and a
joy.


Actually, flying IS a right. In the US, our rights are not granted by our
government, we simply have them. Our government recognizes that our rights
are endowed by our creator, that they are unalienable rights. Our country
was founded on that notion, I refer you to this little nugget from the
Declaration of Independence:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that
among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure
these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just
powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of
Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People
to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its
foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to
them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."

Here's another little nugget, this one is from the Federal Aviation Act of
1958:

PUBLIC RIGHT OF TRANSIT

Sec. 104 [49 U. S. Code 1304]. There is hereby recognized and declared to
exist in behalf of any citizen of the United States a public right of
freedom of transit through the navigable airspace of the United States.

Source: Sec. 3, Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938.

Note that Sec. 104 does not grant the right to fly, it simply recognizes
that it exists. None of our rights are granted by the government, we simply
have them. Now, there are certainly rules to be followed, but those rules
don't take away from your rights, they protect the rights of others.

You have a right to fly, it is not a privilege. If you meet all the
requirements, you cannot be denied an airman's certificate, you have a right
to it.


  #40  
Old August 28th 04, 05:40 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bill Denton" wrote in message
...

Tangential correction...

You probably will not walk, but whatever you say without benefit
of council will probably not be admissible at your trial.


Correction...

Counsel.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What does SWEPT mean in a NOTAM? Roy Smith General Aviation 2 January 30th 05 08:42 PM
funny(?) GPS NOTAM Kyler Laird General Aviation 6 August 18th 04 03:08 PM
WinNotam - new Notam organizer tool JetVision Software Instrument Flight Rules 0 December 14th 03 08:00 PM
WinNotam - new Notam organizer tool JetVision Software Military Aviation 0 December 14th 03 08:00 PM
Misleading Notam Greg Esres Instrument Flight Rules 12 December 3rd 03 04:16 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.