![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ash Wyllie" wrote It's going to be a close election. If the SS shoots enough of the right people the outcaom could be changed. -ash Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil? Starting with you? g -- Jim in NC |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Martin X. Moleski, SJ" writes:
"Ignorance of the law is no excuse" (that I know of). Folks in the Academy of Model Aeronautics are doing what they can to get the word out, but lots of RC pilots are not AMA members. There is no obligation to be a member in order to fly on private property or wherever permission is granted by the owner(s). .... or to fly on PUBLIC property regardless of what the AMA thinks... Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD" To reply, remove the TRABoD! Kaplow Klips & Baffle: http://nira-rocketry.org/LeadingEdge/Phantom4000.pdf www.encompasserve.org/~kaplow_r/ www.nira-rocketry.org www.nar.org Save Model Rocketry from the HSA! http://www.space-rockets.com/congress.html |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Martin X. Moleski, SJ" wrote in message ... "Ignorance of the law is no excuse" (that I know of). But if you're arrested and are ignorant of your right to remain silent, and the cops fail to make you aware of that right, you walk. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 03:25:39 GMT, "G.R. Patterson III"
wrote: I used to fly from a baseball diamond. They're gonna close that? It depends on what you're flying and how much the local enforcers want to crack down. When I picture a confrontation between me and the cops, I picture myself doing whatever they tell me to do, all things being equal. I understand that other people are made of sterner stuff and enjoy fighting with armed officers more than I do. ![]() Marty |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 03:18:20 GMT, "G.R. Patterson III"
wrote: I wonder if some of the HSA people saw posts similar to the model B-52 posts that were going around in this group recently and took some of the humorous comments seriously. I hope that someone is thinking about what can be done with RPVs. I know that the Academy of Model Aeronautics is worried about them. I hope that some resolution can be reached that will allow the innocent to continue enjoying a great hobby while the guilty are detected and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. One non-religious Muslim in our group has already been visited by the FBI. It was a cordial visit spurred by Erol's purchase of two quarts of hydrochloric acid from an auto store (if I remember correctly). They were on his doorstep later that day. He was using the acid to anodize some aluminum parts. He answered the door wearing a T-shirt with some nuclear symbols on it from his day job at a nuclear research center. I imagine it was a little tense at first, but he's laughing about it now. Marty |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tangential correction...
You probably will not walk, but whatever you say without benefit of council will probably not be admissible at your trial. "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ink.net... "Martin X. Moleski, SJ" wrote in message ... "Ignorance of the law is no excuse" (that I know of). But if you're arrested and are ignorant of your right to remain silent, and the cops fail to make you aware of that right, you walk. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bill Denton wrote: You probably will not walk, but whatever you say without benefit of council will probably not be admissible at your trial. Even if you do walk, you will be a much poorer individual. A competent attorney will charge a contingency fee of several thousand just to handle a felony charge. If it gets before a jury, you'll be into the tens of thousands. George Patterson If you want to know God's opinion of money, just look at the people he gives it to. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Martin X. Moleski, SJ" wrote in message ... It seems to me that flying is not a right; it is a privilege and a joy. Actually, flying IS a right. In the US, our rights are not granted by our government, we simply have them. Our government recognizes that our rights are endowed by our creator, that they are unalienable rights. Our country was founded on that notion, I refer you to this little nugget from the Declaration of Independence: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness." Here's another little nugget, this one is from the Federal Aviation Act of 1958: PUBLIC RIGHT OF TRANSIT Sec. 104 [49 U. S. Code 1304]. There is hereby recognized and declared to exist in behalf of any citizen of the United States a public right of freedom of transit through the navigable airspace of the United States. Source: Sec. 3, Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938. Note that Sec. 104 does not grant the right to fly, it simply recognizes that it exists. None of our rights are granted by the government, we simply have them. Now, there are certainly rules to be followed, but those rules don't take away from your rights, they protect the rights of others. You have a right to fly, it is not a privilege. If you meet all the requirements, you cannot be denied an airman's certificate, you have a right to it. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Denton" wrote in message ... Tangential correction... You probably will not walk, but whatever you say without benefit of council will probably not be admissible at your trial. Correction... Counsel. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What does SWEPT mean in a NOTAM? | Roy Smith | General Aviation | 2 | January 30th 05 08:42 PM |
funny(?) GPS NOTAM | Kyler Laird | General Aviation | 6 | August 18th 04 03:08 PM |
WinNotam - new Notam organizer tool | JetVision Software | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | December 14th 03 08:00 PM |
WinNotam - new Notam organizer tool | JetVision Software | Military Aviation | 0 | December 14th 03 08:00 PM |
Misleading Notam | Greg Esres | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | December 3rd 03 04:16 AM |