BOHICA! Weiner's Bill to Restrict GA

"W P Dixon" wrote in message
...
See
the point, it is christianity that is under attack.

Oooook...

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
k.net...

"John Harlow" wrote in message
...

No, it is a desire to control an individual's choice as to who they can
marry. It's none of Bush's damn business who I, you or anybody else
choose to marry.


It places no restrictions on who anybody can marry.


I sure hope you look out for other traffic better than you look out for this
country's freedoms.

Your politics gives you a whopping blind spot, and there is a torpedo
heading right toward you.

Well Pete I have defended the Constitution have you? VET USMC
"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message
et...

"W P Dixon" wrote in message
...
Does anyone else see a pattern
with the Democratic Party.
Seems they preach and preach about freedom, but always do their best
to
take it away from us against The Constitution. It's frustrating!



Stop with this garbage about the Democratic party. Those wanting to take
our freedoms and everything else from us come from both parties so cut the
crap and be prepared to defend those rights from assault no matter which
party they come from.

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:59:36 -0400, "W P Dixon"
wrote:

If the church tells us what marriage "WILL BE" is
that not establishing religion..

Yes, and our constitution prohibits this country from passing it AS
LAW.

wrote:

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:59:36 -0400, "W P Dixon"
wrote:

If the church tells us what marriage "WILL BE" is
that not establishing religion..

Yes, and our constitution prohibits this country from passing it AS
LAW.

Unfortunately, our Constitution is not self-limiting. That is, if we pass
an amendment which makes the US a theocracy, a theocracy it will be.

The only real protection we have is that the threshold for passing an
amendment is set relatively high.

- Andrew

We have already crossed the line... The government already allows special privileges to 'married' couples that single
folks do not have. If marriage is as defined by 'religion', and the government freezes that definition into law, then
the government is establishing a religion - contrary to the constitution.

There should be no special government considerations given to 'married' folks, regardless of the institution that
defined the 'marriage.

But this is way OT....



Here is a sample letter someone passed my way:

Dear Congressman,



I just heard about H.R. 5053 introduced by Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.). I strongly request that you NOT support this
bill and actively seek to stop the passage of this bill in any form.



As a private pilot that understands general aviation I strongly disagree with the assumptions presumed by this bill.
This bill proposes to add SEVERE restriction to all aviation activity, exempting the airlines, in the name of furthering
security. Shamefully this bill again attacks general aviation which government and private security experts have
continually said does not present a significant threat.



This bill imposes major increases in government regulation and raises major costs for all parties involved. It will
also severely restricts use of major public and private infrastructure throughout the nation, 17,000 landing facilities
and more than 200,000 aircraft. Those numbers represent ENORMOUS investment of both public and private funds. Those
investments generate substantial business activity throughout our economy.



A bill like this does nothing to increase security but does further restrict the freedom of law abiding citizens. I
would ask that you not just work to keep America free, but work to keep in place the freedoms Americans treasure.



Thank you,

"W P Dixon" wrote in message
...
Well Pete I have defended the Constitution have you? VET USMC

Being a veteran does not prove you have defended the Constitution. Your
words tell a lot about you.
Are you so blinded by your politics and religion that you do not see the
danger of your viewpoint?

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:03:37 -0700, "C J Campbell"
wrote in
::

They appear willing to stop at nothing in their effort to
seize power through intrigue and deception.



Are you referring to this kind of rhetoric?




Back in February, President Bush sat down in the Oval Office for an
interview with Tim Russert and spoke about his service in the National
Guard. Bush told us, "I put in my time, proudly so." He said, "And I'm
telling you, I did my duty."

But now we know that Bush dishonored the Oval Office by lying to the
American people.

New investigations from multiple media sources have revealed the truth
about President Bush's service. New military documents show that Bush
disobeyed a direct order from his commander to take a flight physical
and "failed to perform to U.S. Air Force/Texas Air National Guard
standards" -- and was grounded as a result.

New evidence supports claims that Bush missed months of service and
that he never showed up for service with the Alabama National Guard.

New evidence shows that Bush received special treatment. His
supervisor wrote that he felt pressured from above to "sugar coat"
Bush's records.

And Ben Barnes, former Lt. Governor and State House Speaker of Texas,
has come forward to say that he pulled strings to get Bush a coveted
spot in the Guard, which directly contradicts Bush's claim that he
received no special treatment.
Only Bush Can Answer Questions

President Bush has a lot to answer for. Only he can clear up the
questions regarding the discrepancies in his service record, and he
owes the American people those answers. Here are just a few of the
questions Bush must answer.

* Why did George Bush say "I did my duty" when he missed months of
duty in 1972, 73 and 74?

* How did George Bush avoid getting called into active service for
missing months of duty in 1972, 73, and 74?

* Why did George Bush disobey a direct order to take his physical?

* What standard did George Bush fail to meet when he was grounded for
failing to perform at US Air Force/Texas Air National Guard Standards?

* Why did George Bush go above his commander's head to ensure a
favorable evaluation he had not earned?

* Why did George Bush say he received "no special treatment" when Ben
Barnes says he pulled strings to secure a Guard slot for him?

* Who asked Bush family friend Sidney Adger to get Bush a slot in the
Guard immediately after Bush graduated and at the height of the
Vietnam War?

* When will George Bush produce any credible witness who can attest
to his service in the Alabama Air National Guard?

Take Action

You can help us hold Bush accountable. Sign our petition to President
Bush and demand that he answer the American people's questions about
his Guard service.

http://redir.democrats.org/rdr/002Tj009Ht0001D

"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message
et...

I sure hope you look out for other traffic better than you look out for
this country's freedoms.

Your politics gives you a whopping blind spot, and there is a torpedo
heading right toward you.

You're mistaken, I have no blind spot.

"Andrew Gideon" wrote in message
online.com...

Unfortunately, our Constitution is not self-limiting. That is, if we pass
an amendment which makes the US a theocracy, a theocracy it will be.

The only real protection we have is that the threshold for passing an
amendment is set relatively high.


Doesn't matter. We can just ignore the Constitution or declare it to mean
something other than what it clearly states.