![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Michelle P wrote: If you have a Constant Speed prop you will not see the RPM drop as long as you are within the authority of the governor. Well, when I bought my Maule, I couldn't scrape up the extra $15k for the version with the CS prop. :-) George Patterson If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have been looking for it. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marco Leon wrote:
I'm with you on that one Peter. I didn't get the impression that you were hesitant to declare an emergency for any other reason than you didn't really think it was an emgergency. having failed magnetos is definitely an emergency. Can the other fail too? Sure. The first died so it would be a good assumption to say the 2nd are stressed an equal amount and possibly now even more. Is a dead stick landing an emergency? Well as long as you don't stall it in..... I don't think I need to go any futher. What it comes down to is the airplane, it's airworthiness is compromised. Get on the ground at completely your descretion. Declare an emergency. You received the same results (i.e. service from ATC) and that's what counts. in this case yes but when in ANY doubt, declare it. Would it be unreasonable for ATC to say "you are #2 for landing" rather than "everyone get the hell out of the way for the aircraft that declared an emergency." If there is ANY doubt, declare it. It can only help. Gerald Sylvester |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Gideon wrote
So that would only occur if the capacitor failed "closed"? No! Just can't win, can you Andrew.....:-) Bob Moore |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Peter R.
writes: at least the controller gave you what you needed to have a successful outcome, regardless of the side they chose in the bet. Only after we disregarded his "instructions" and told him what we were going to do. John |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Corky Scott ) wrote:
snip The person who invented the capacitor was pretty smart. Magnetos still use points, so they need to have capacitors or the points would fail quickly. If the capacitor shorts to ground, it grounds out the the points, which of course fails the magneto. Thank you for taking the time to expand on the explanation. It is now coming together for me. -- Peter |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Duniho wrote:
The capacitor is in the circuit in parallel with the normal path of the current. If it fails in the closed circuit state, this provides an alternate route for the current coming from the magneto, shorting it out and preventing a spark from being generated. But when it fails in the open state, there is still the normal path of the current available for shorting out the magneto when the ignition switch is in the off position. Make sense? Yes, thanks. - Andrew |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Moore wrote:
Andrew Gideon wrote So that would only occur if the capacitor failed "closed"? No! Just can't win, can you Andrew.....:-) So that would only occur if the capacitor failed sideways? - Andrew |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My experience with failed mags is fortunately limited to Fouled plugs
on the runup. However I am aware of 2 interesting incidents involving Mag's. 1. My flight Instructor was flying departing in a 414. Upon starting one engine he could just barely get it run it was coughing, sputtering backfiring, etc. He shut down and brought the Mechanic who determined that the timing on one of the Mags had slipped. It was firing but at the wrong time. Sorry I am not a Mechanic so I don't know what would have happed to cause that. However had my instuctor done a mag check he would have found that the engine ran fine on one mag and not at all on the other. lesson Learned if an engine start running rough or badly in flight a mag check is a worth while check. 2. A local Cropduster pilot had just finished up and was taking his Ag-Cat back to the home base about 5 miles away. On his Runup he discovered that one mag had died completely. He opted to fly it back to base to get it fixed. Upon landing at his home base he 1st took it to the fuel pump and fueled it. After Fueling he could not get it to start. The 2nd Mag had failed! So far my worse experience with a Mechanical Fail has been the nut on one of the intake valves worked loose in our Tomahawk and the engine began running rough and lost a couple hundred RPM. We simply informed ATC that the engine was running rough and we were diverting to the nearest airport. Brian CFIIG/ASEL |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Brian Case wrote: After Fueling he could not get it to start. The 2nd Mag had failed! While possible, it's much more likely that the dead mag was the one with the impulse coupling. The impulse coupling retards the spark and increases the magneto output to get the engine started. There is usually only one, and it's usually on the left magneto. George Patterson If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have been looking for it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots | paul k. sanchez | Piloting | 19 | September 27th 04 11:49 PM |
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP | vvcd | Piloting | 0 | September 22nd 04 07:13 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |