A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why does PW-5 get no respect?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 24th 03, 03:56 PM
Kirk Stant
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Chris OCallaghan) wrote in message . com...
The selection was based on much more than handling or aesthetics.
Cost, licensing for manufacture, home building options, long-term
factory support...


And how many homebuilt PW-5s have been completed? Or for that matter,
it seems the factory support has been a bit iffy?

The point is not which glider was selected, but that any selection
would have failed. (snip)


Good point, unfortunately. If they used the sailing model for
one-design classes, they completely missed the point. The popular
one-designs in sailing are either relatively inexpensive (such as
Lasers) so beginners can easily get into racing (Sorry, the PW-5 is
not inexpensive!), or very high performance and/or very expensive
(Finn, America's cup etc) so that they attract the serious racers. So
the World class concept was doomed unless it sanctioned a hot racing
ship (let's say LS-8), or came up with a design that 18 year olds
could afford to buy (like a used 1-26).

Obviously, neither happened. Some of the other criteria are bogus.
Homebuilding! Give me a break. Racers do not want to spend their time
building it, they want to be out flying it so they can win! The
emphasis should have been on mass production, not homebuilding.

And unfortunately, aethetics do count a lot in this sport. Sorry all
you PW-5 fans out there, but it just doesn't look like a racing
glider, by current standards. So most serious racers just blow it off
(probably unfortunately, since in the right conditions I'm sure it's a
lot of fun to race!).

If it ever gets common and inexpensive enough (think 1-26) it may then
have a chance, by default. I hope so, because nothing else seems to
be out there in sufficient numbers yet.

Our experience out here in AZ is that several pilots (both new glider
pilots and experienced racers) bought PW-5s a few years ago - and
after a few seasons most got rid of them and either moved up to higher
performance used ships or motorgliders!

Hopefully the PW-5 will have a future as a 1-26 replacement in club
and commercial rental fleets (in the US at least).

Kirk
  #2  
Old November 24th 03, 08:10 PM
Robert Ehrlich
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kirk Stant wrote:
...
So the World class concept was doomed unless it sanctioned a hot racing
ship (let's say LS-8), or came up with a design that 18 year olds
could afford to buy (like a used 1-26).
...


The second possibility doesn't really exist. Used ships can't be a World
Class since their availablity depends on the used market. Building new
1-26s, if anyone would be sufficiently mad to try that, would bring these
new ships in the same price range as other new ships, i.e. not for the
average 18 year olds, and there is no way at the present time that any
new built glider would be affordable for them (or for anybody of any age
without higher than average income).
  #3  
Old November 25th 03, 06:24 AM
Kirk Stant
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Robert Ehrlich wrote in message ...
Kirk Stant wrote:
...
So the World class concept was doomed unless it sanctioned a hot racing
ship (let's say LS-8), or came up with a design that 18 year olds
could afford to buy (like a used 1-26).
...


The second possibility doesn't really exist. Used ships can't be a World
Class since their availablity depends on the used market. Building new
1-26s, if anyone would be sufficiently mad to try that, would bring these
new ships in the same price range as other new ships, i.e. not for the
average 18 year olds, and there is no way at the present time that any
new built glider would be affordable for them (or for anybody of any age
without higher than average income).



Robert, you are absolutely correct. What I was trying to get across
was that unless the cost of the new World Class glider was about the
same as the cost of a used 20 year old 1-26, it would be hard to get
any real interest started in it.

I must admit that I havn't flown a PW-5 yet (planning on checking one
out this spring) but have some time in the old 1-26 - on a hot day,
with the sports canopy option (open canopy), it is a real hoot to fly.
No performance to speak of, but still a lot of fun. Maybe what
should have been done is to select the 1-26 as the world class glider!

Naaah... never happen...

Anyway, what is the response to the PW-5 in France these days?

Kirk
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
About Acellerated Courses for Private Dudley Henriques Piloting 137 July 22nd 04 05:21 AM
Slavery In Aviation Bob Dole Piloting 118 November 26th 03 09:33 PM
am I loser? Frederick Wilson Home Built 40 August 28th 03 12:22 PM
About those anti-aviatoin newsgroups C J Campbell Piloting 200 August 21st 03 03:25 PM
Happy Fourth, Folks! MLenoch Piloting 10 July 14th 03 09:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.