![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's interesting that everyone is talking about aligning with the
centerline of the runway. Why not set up a diagonal landing and thus reduce the crosswind component at touchdown. Even on a narrow runway, one can line up on the downwind side and touch down maybe 20 degrees or more into the wind. With practice, one can land even more into the wind, then while the rudder is still effective, make a gentle downwind turn so the nose is again away from the crosswind and as speed drops, the glider will finally weathervane into the wind. The ground track is a kind of S turn. -Tom |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
5Z wrote:
Even on a narrow runway, one can line up on the downwind side and touch down maybe 20 degrees or more into the wind. A recipe for disaster. Obviously you've never seen a narrow runway. Reminds me of that old joke where a navy pilot talks about a somewhat short, but very large runway. Stefan |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Eiler wrote:
.... Exactly what is your definition of 'flying straight' and 'turn'? .... I'm always amused to see to which degree a very simple action can be artificially complicated. Just land that plane. When I talked about crabbing as the natural, most comfortable, most flexible and simply best method for crosswind correction, I thought of a stedy crosswind, of course. When it's gusty and turbulent, as a former poster mentioned, then me too, I just do what has to be done to keep the ship and me in one piece, and think about it later, if at all. Heck, I've even flown regular *turns* (yuck!) in the final, when conditions asked for them! But I wouldn't teach that to a student. Stefan |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Stefan wrote: A recipe for disaster. Obviously you've never seen a narrow runway. With that tone, I assume you've never seen a wide runway! ![]() I think it's obvious that each landing requires a unique set of tools to be applied. Where I fly, the runway is about 14M wide with grass on either side and no lights. Easy to apply some of my techniques. At another airport the runway is maybe 25M wide with lights and a bit of a dropoff from pavenent to rough dirt on the sides. Still easy to land diagonally. I have also landed on areas that are just a few meters wide (of smooth ground) with rough terrain on either side. In this case I would indeed line up on the centerline and stay there. I have also landed in the "paddock" in the middle of the airport, and flown the approach at 90 degrees to the paved runway when the wind was 40-50 knots. A recipe for disaster is to not make the best approach for the conditions. -Tom |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
5Z wrote:
With that tone, I assume you've never seen a wide runway! ![]() You're partly correct. I still remember my first landing on a paved runway with actual, painted numbers and a real center line. Just like the big guys! Now *that* was an adventure! Where I fly, the runway is about 14M wide with grass on either side and no lights. Easy to apply some of my techniques. At another airport the runway is maybe 25M wide with lights and a bit of a dropoff from pavenent to rough dirt on the sides. Still easy to land diagonally. At my home base, the runway (sort of, difficult to tell on grass) is about 20 meters wide. On One side, there are often some gliders parked along the runway, on the other side are 30 cm high markers. I don't like the idea of landing diagonally. A recipe for disaster is to not make the best approach for the conditions. I fully agree. Stefan |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stefan wrote:
5Z wrote: Even on a narrow runway, one can line up on the downwind side and touch down maybe 20 degrees or more into the wind. A recipe for disaster. Obviously you've never seen a narrow runway. I saw Tom at Boulder once, before the runway was widened to 16 feet or so. :-) Reminds me of that old joke where a navy pilot talks about a somewhat short, but very large runway. Stefan |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok here is a little video gem for you all....in the middle of this
video http://www.silentflight.com/movies/silentflight.wmv there is a crosswind landing (30 degree + in 20+ knots of wind) in my ASW22. Big Plane, Big wind, Big crosswind angle. Note the yaw string in the incockpit footage. enjoy... Al |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've seen quite a few. And the reason to have the discussion is because
competent pilots continue to break themselves and their gliders as a result of pilot error. Why? Well, we're exploring one avenue. You are welcome to help us or not. Cheers |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"My god," the pilot exclaimed as the plane screeched to a halt. "That
has to be the shortest runway I've ever had to land on." "Yeah," replied the copilot, "But look how wide it is!" |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Todd,
You have the advantage of a pretty clear understanding of what's going on in the air. In yearspast (yes, years... arrrgh!), the "difference" between crabbing and slipping has been a bone of contention. As I noted earlier in the thread, the Soaring Flight Manual presents crabbing and side slipping as additive. The new direction is to divorce this notion from discussion of crosswind landings. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tailwheel Crosswind Landing | Piloting | 32 | December 6th 04 02:42 AM | |
Thermal right, land left | John | Soaring | 195 | April 1st 04 11:43 PM |
Baby Bush will be Closing Airports in California to VFR Flight Again | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 119 | March 13th 04 02:56 AM |
Warszaw Pact War Plans ( The Effects of a Global Thermonuclear War ...) | Matt Wiser | Military Aviation | 0 | December 7th 03 08:20 PM |
Dr. Jack's Wind Direction | rjciii | Soaring | 14 | October 5th 03 05:37 AM |