![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott,
Did look. Did you? Re-read the thread. And when you do you will find further, especially that by Gerry Hamm. Yes and it's taking 2 years plus on a ship less than half the size of the America. You are comparing apples to oranges. Different ship, built in a different era = different contaminants. For example, there was no wooden flight deck planking on AMERICA, thus no need to remediate that potential pollution source. Other contaminants on AMERICA exist only in de minimus quantities (quantities so small as not to be any hazard) or have been controlled (through encapsulation, neutralization, etc.) over the years. Further, ORISKANY was decommissioned and mothballed in 1976, some time before the passage and implementation of the key pieces of environmental legislation (RECRA, CERCLA, etc.) that most affect the use, control, and mitigation of pollutants. So it is not surprising that, weather factors excluded, it took ~2 years to ready ORISKANY. ...and yet the Navy is able to prepare the America for this in months instead of years, Wrong again, basis posts in this NG by others. with no money or manpower explicitly budgeted? Please cite the source for your statement that "no money or manpower [was] explicitly budgeted." -- Mike Kanze "The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards." - Sir William Francis Butler "Scott Peterson" wrote in message ... "Mike Kanze" wrote: I don't. Sounds as if you may have an agenda in your post. Don't waste time looking for what's not there. It's a legitimate question as the navy does not have a particularly good environmental record. Others in this NG have separately cited the length of time that the Navy has been preparing for this SINKEX. Did look. Did you? It was first announced by the Navy about the beginning of March, this year. Their announcement at that time said that "some" materials had been removed. If you are truly interested - and not just trolling - do a Google search on the plans and environmental preparations for the upcoming scuttling of the former USS ORISKANY (CV-34) as an artificial reef off the Florida Panhandle. One example of these is the removal of ORISKANY's wooden flight deck planking due to PCB contamination. This will give you perhaps the most comparable analog to what the Navy did to prepare AMERICA. Yes and it's taking 2 years plus on a ship less than half the size of the America. Oriskany is also having to make two trips between Florida and Texas to avoid hurricanes while they are working on her. ...and yet the Navy is able to prepare the America for this in months instead of years, with no money or manpower explicitly budgeted? -- Scott Peterson -- After eating, do amphibians have to wait an hour before getting out of the water? 127/612 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Kanze" wrote:
Please cite the source for your statement that "no money or manpower [was] explicitly budgeted." http://navweb.secnav.navy.mil/pubbud/04pres/db_u.htm Scott Peterson -- Kids in the back seat cause accidents; accidents in the back seat cause kids. 260/612 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE..... | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 19 | October 24th 03 07:51 PM |
God Honest | Naval Aviation | 2 | July 24th 03 04:45 AM |