![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll file that away for the day when most of the GA fleet is WAAS-capable.
I'm sure that the AIM will have changed by that time. Bob Gardner "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "Bob Gardner" wrote: AIM 1-1-19(a)(8) tells pilots not to use GPS altitude: "GPS altitude should not be relied upon to determine aircraft altitude since the vertical error can be quite large." Except when using WAAS, when it is quite small. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Gardner wrote:
AIM 1-1-19(a)(8) tells pilots not to use GPS altitude: "GPS altitude should not be relied upon to determine aircraft altitude since the vertical error can be quite large." Main reason is that other planes will be using pressure-based altimeters so maintaining separation can only be done when everyone uses the same method with the same errors. GPS altitude is measured above the GPS sphere, which is not sea level. No, GPS altitude is measured above the ellipsoid defined by WGS-84, not any spherical surface. Furthermore, the altitude is then corrected using a lookup table to account for the difference between the geoid (which represents the sea-level surface) and the ellipsoid. The altitude figure displayed by the GPS receiver is therefore measured from the hypothetical sea-level surface. Bob Gardner "Aluckyguess" wrote in message news ![]() How come the GPS reads a different altitude than the Altimeter? As others have mentioned, the pressure-based altimeter assumes a standard atmosphere model for the temperature lapse rate and can be quite far off if the actual conditions don't match the model - even when the altimeter is corrected for the current ground-level pressure. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks
"Peter" wrote in message ... Bob Gardner wrote: AIM 1-1-19(a)(8) tells pilots not to use GPS altitude: "GPS altitude should not be relied upon to determine aircraft altitude since the vertical error can be quite large." Main reason is that other planes will be using pressure-based altimeters so maintaining separation can only be done when everyone uses the same method with the same errors. GPS altitude is measured above the GPS sphere, which is not sea level. No, GPS altitude is measured above the ellipsoid defined by WGS-84, not any spherical surface. Furthermore, the altitude is then corrected using a lookup table to account for the difference between the geoid (which represents the sea-level surface) and the ellipsoid. The altitude figure displayed by the GPS receiver is therefore measured from the hypothetical sea-level surface. Bob Gardner "Aluckyguess" wrote in message news ![]() How come the GPS reads a different altitude than the Altimeter? As others have mentioned, the pressure-based altimeter assumes a standard atmosphere model for the temperature lapse rate and can be quite far off if the actual conditions don't match the model - even when the altimeter is corrected for the current ground-level pressure. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 14:19:32 -0700, Peter
wrote: Main reason is that other planes will be using pressure-based altimeters so maintaining separation can only be done when everyone uses the same method with the same errors. Boaters run into this problem all the time (as it were). The GPS is more accurate than the chart. Not a problem when it comes to buoys, since NOAA uses GPS now when setting them in place, but a big problem when it comes to rocks. They were charted by optical means. -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Aluckyguess" wrote in message news ![]() GPS altitudes are calculated in a way that is similar to how latitude and longitude is calculated. Your GPS altitude is what is called a geopotential altitude and it is based on a sphere. If you don't already know, the Earth is an imperfect sphere. That is where wide area augmentation system (WAAS) signals kick in with corrections to the latitude, longitude and altitude. Even without WAAS, altitude is usually pretty close. Don't forget the altimeter in the airplane can be off also. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
CryptWolf wrote:
"Aluckyguess" wrote in message news ![]() GPS altitudes are calculated in a way that is similar to how latitude and longitude is calculated. Your GPS altitude is what is called a geopotential altitude and it is based on a sphere. If you don't already know, the Earth is an imperfect sphere. That is where wide area augmentation system (WAAS) signals kick in with corrections to the latitude, longitude and altitude. Even without WAAS, altitude is usually pretty close. Yes it is, which makes it very clear that your previous statement about GPS altitudes being based on a spherical earth is false. The earth's polar and equatorial radii differ by about 13 miles, so altitudes based on a spherical model would be off by miles. But my measurements with my non-WAAS GPS show the altitude measurements to be within 40' well over 95% of the time. In fact, the GPS measurements are based on the WGS-84 defined ellipsoidal shape of the earth and then corrected for the difference between the geoid (the hypothetical mean sea-level surface) and the ellipsoid. Don't forget the altimeter in the airplane can be off also. If the GPS has a good skyview of the satellites then this is the most likely source of the discrepancy. Pressure-based altitudes depend on an assumed standard model of the atmosphere. The actual conditions can be quite different and result in considerable variation of the reported altitude. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
GPS is most accurate when your position is surrounded by satellites. In
the horizontal plane, that is usually true. In the vertical direction, you always have satellites above you, but none below you. This also makes altitude slightly more difficult to resolve. http://gpsinformation.net/main/altitude.htm -- Gene Seibel Gene & Sue's Aeroplanes - http://pad39a.com/gene/planes.html Because we fly, we envy no one. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene Seibel wrote:
GPS is most accurate when your position is surrounded by satellites. In the horizontal plane, that is usually true. In the vertical direction, you always have satellites above you, but none below you. This also makes altitude slightly more difficult to resolve. http://gpsinformation.net/main/altitude.htm It's true that GPS vertical accuracy is worse by about a factor of 1.5 to 2 than horizontal accuracy. But despite this, GPS vertical accuracy is still better than using barometric pressure when you're at a significantly different altitude than the reference point giving the barometric calibration. The continued use of pressure-based altimeters is for consistency and reliability - not accuracy. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GREAT AVIATION READS | Cribsheet | Piloting | 1 | September 12th 04 02:51 AM |
GREAT AVIATION READS | Cribsheet | Rotorcraft | 0 | September 10th 04 06:06 PM |
GREAT AVIATION READS | Cribsheet | Military Aviation | 0 | September 7th 04 06:37 PM |
When the ASI Reads Below Zero | BTIZ | Piloting | 11 | August 23rd 04 04:57 PM |
Newsweek Reads RAM! | Bob McKellar | Military Aviation | 0 | February 17th 04 02:10 AM |