![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Gardner wrote:
Before I had a car with automatic daytime running lights (05 Corolla), I routinely turned on my headlights during the day. DRLs are mandatory in Canada and many other countries. Motorcyclists keep their headlights on during the day to enhance visibility. The "camouflage" theory is faulty. But why on earth must the motorcyclists keep the day lights on HIGH? I can see them just fine with regular lights. The HIGH beams not only force me to hit the night option on my rearview mirror (reducing the chance to see cars without any lights in the mirror) but are incredibly aggravating. Enhancing visibility is a good idea. Blinding me is not. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "kristoffer-m20j" wrote in that being said what is the SOP for airliners when it comes to turning on the landing light. Is it altitude based, distance etc... below 10000. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Blanche" wrote But why on earth must the motorcyclists keep the day lights on HIGH? I can see them just fine with regular lights. The HIGH beams not only force me to hit the night option on my rearview mirror (reducing the chance to see cars without any lights in the mirror) but are incredibly aggravating. Enhancing visibility is a good idea. Blinding me is not. Are you talking about the high lights being a problem during the day, or at night? -- Jim in NC |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Larry Dighera wrote: There is also a Quartz equivalent lamp #Q4509 with the same specifications except a 100 hour life and 140,000 candlepower. The Q4509 is what I used in the 182. With the standard bulb I'd be lucky to get 25 hours, with the Q bulb I was getting 100+ hours. -- Dale L. Falk There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing around with airplanes. http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "W P Dixon" wrote I hate those car lights!, Oh they'd be great on my car while driving, but being in a car heading into them I hate it! Blinds the crap out of me in my wife's low sitting car. Doesn't bother me as bad in my truck. I know what you mean. IMHO, they ought to be banned, except for use on high beam, with a regular light for low beam. I don't know if there are any stats on crashes being caused by blindness from oncoming cars with HID's, or if there ever has been a crashed cause by HID blindness. There have been times when I felt unsafe, because of being temporarily blinded by those things on two lane roads. -- Jim in NC |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I will defer to more knowledgeable AMEs here for an "exact" definition if I
am using the term "certified" incorrectly . What I meant was FAA approved replacement part as compared with similar specification part lacking correct aviation paperwork. It is my understanding that some owners install (but do not log) non-certified?? replacement bulbs due to much lower cost. Happy landings, "Mike W." wrote in message ... What is a certified bulb, exactly? "Private" wrote in message news:fuP8f.345716$tl2.15531@pd7tw3no... snip I would think that owners who are not as fussy about using certified bulbs are more likely to use the light for safety. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Private" wrote in message news:Y8%8f.351571$oW2.280247@pd7tw1no... I will defer to more knowledgeable AMEs here for an "exact" definition if I am using the term "certified" incorrectly . What I meant was FAA approved replacement part as compared with similar specification part lacking correct aviation paperwork. It is my understanding that some owners install (but do not log) non-certified?? replacement bulbs due to much lower cost. There is a current thread, subject "Landing Lights at NAPA", on rec.aviation.owning that discusses this subject extensively. Happy landings, "Mike W." wrote in message ... What is a certified bulb, exactly? "Private" wrote in message news:fuP8f.345716$tl2.15531@pd7tw3no... snip I would think that owners who are not as fussy about using certified bulbs are more likely to use the light for safety. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 29 Oct 2005 21:32:48 -0700, "Jay Honeck"
wrote: Before I had a car with automatic daytime running lights (05 Corolla), I routinely turned on my headlights during the day. DRLs are mandatory in Canada and many other countries. Motorcyclists keep their headlights on during the day to enhance visibility. The "camouflage" theory is faulty. Apples and oranges. On the ground, a landing light (or headlights) will probably enhance visibility, even in the daytime. (Although, as other posters have noted, not all the time.) I see a lot of the newer cars with those damed bluish white lights. They say they are better than the regular ones, but to older eyes those things are blinding. One on dims is worse than a set of halogens on bright for me. I don't fly around with my landing light on (unless I forget) as it's in the wheel well and does nothing except warm up the well a tad. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 01:39:35 -0500, "Morgans"
wrote: "Blanche" wrote But why on earth must the motorcyclists keep the day lights on HIGH? I can see them just fine with regular lights. The HIGH beams not only force me to hit the night option on my rearview mirror (reducing the chance to see cars without any lights in the mirror) but are incredibly aggravating. Enhancing visibility is a good idea. Blinding me is not. Are you talking about the high lights being a problem during the day, or at night? Both! Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 13:04:08 -0800, Dale wrote:
In article . com, "Jay Honeck" wrote: I wonder, though -- do landing lights in the daytime really do that much for you? I seem to recall reading that bright lights coming at you during daylight hours actually tends to camouflage what is behind them. (Groping back into the distant recesses of my history minor here...) Didn't the British actually experiment with using extremely bright lights to hide their aircraft during the day? Do headlights hide an oncoming car? No. But they make a VW look like it's twice as far away as a buic right beside it. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com The US did some work using a bank of lights facing forward to hide an aircraft for ASW work. From what I've read it was effective, but was never implemented. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Skycraft Landing Light Pix, Part II | Jay Honeck | Owning | 6 | February 6th 05 08:38 PM |
Skycraft Landing Light Installation Pix | Jay Honeck | Owning | 5 | February 6th 05 02:05 PM |
Skycraft Landing Light? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 8 | May 28th 04 07:23 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation | Gilan | Home Built | 17 | September 24th 03 06:11 AM |