A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old December 14th 05, 10:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

Regarding security, I think you ask the $99 question: "What reasonable
standard exists to protect the public without infringing too much on
the right of the law-abiding?" Trade-offs suck, but when we have
psychotic terrorists killing our citizens, using our "freedoms" to their
twisted advantage, I think everyone would agree that their needs to be
some restrictions on personal liberty.


It's "there needs to be". Spelling aside, I do =not= agree with this at
all. It is the price of freedom. Freedom disappears long before
security appears.

My criticisms of GA are limited mostly to complete lack of community
control over any aspect of airport operations at many facilities.


If every town set its own flight rules, flying would become so
impractical as to disappear. Noise rules =are= a kind of flight rules.

Jose
--
You can choose whom to befriend, but you cannot choose whom to love.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #32  
Old December 14th 05, 10:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility


"Andrew Gideon" wrote in message
online.com...
wrote:

Come on, Sky-buffoon... Who could have ever imagined airliners being
used in such an insidious and evil way before 9/11?


Didn't one of those "Jack Ryan" novels have an airliner deliberately
crashed
into Congress?

- Andrew


Yep in Debt of Honor by a senior Japan Air pilot.


  #33  
Old December 14th 05, 10:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility


"Skylune" wrote in message
Regarding security, I think you ask the $99 question: "What reasonable
standard exists to protect the public without infringing too much on
the right of the law-abiding?" Trade-offs suck, but when we have
psychotic terrorists killing our citizens, using our "freedoms" to their
twisted advantage, I think everyone would agree that their needs to be
some restrictions on personal liberty.


Only nut cases like you would think such a thing.


  #34  
Old December 14th 05, 11:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

"Skylune" wrote in
lkaboutaviation.com:

Snipola
I need to pull out the handy John Adams quote again: "Facts are stubborn
things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates
of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."


Pot - kettle - black.

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
Like censorship and not getting support help? Switch to Supernews!
They won't even answer questions through your ISP!
  #35  
Old December 14th 05, 11:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

Yes, they are new and no, they are not really reasonable,
they do not look at a Canadian of Irish descent and
differently than they do for a Muslim from a refugee camp in
Palestine.


--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

"Skylune" wrote in message
lkaboutaviation.com...
| by "Jim Macklin"
Dec 14, 2005 at
| 03:08 PM
|
|
| All non-US citizens begin flight training are required to
| submit a fee of $150 and a complete history and
photographs
| before beginning flight training. All CFIs/flight schools
| are required to verify citizenship for all students and
may
| not train a non-citizen until they are approved by the
TSA.
| There is an exception for already certificated pilots just
| getting recurrent training, etc
|
| Jim: The requirements for non citizens are new (post
9/11/01), aren't
| they? They seem pretty reasonable to me.
|
|
|


  #36  
Old December 14th 05, 11:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

There are many sources you can look up. You will even find
reports of airline pilots killing attempted hijackers BEFORE
the date of the Cuban hijackings, which began after the PO
rescinded the requirement for armed pilots.


--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in message
...
|
| "Jim Macklin" wrote
in message
| news:bL%nf.29034$QW2.18759@dukeread08...
|
|
| BTW, Pilots on the airlines were required to be armed
before
| the mid-late 60's, to protect the mail. Your postman
| walking the street also often had a gun in his big
leather
| bag. But LBJs postmaster general took them away.
|
|
| Do you have a cite for that? I grew up at the airport
hanging around the
| Trans Texas Airlines (Later Texas International) office
and I think I'd
| remember after 65 or 66 if the pilots were carrying guns.
I know TTA was
| carrying airmail because one of my Grandfathers side jobs
was taking the
| mail from the post office to the airport.
|
|


  #37  
Old December 14th 05, 11:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility


Jim Macklin wrote:
Your postman
walking the street also often had a gun in his big leather
bag. But LBJs postmaster general took them away.


Interesting. It could have given a whole new meaning to the phrase
"going postal". I'd hate to be working in the sorting room on
Publisher's Clearinghouse day :-)

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)

  #38  
Old December 14th 05, 11:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

Going "postal" never happened when there were many armed
people present, it is only possible for mass shootings in
public place to happen when the victims are unarmed and the
shooter knows and expects this condition. Crazy people are
not stupid, only crazy.


--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
some support
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm



--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

"John Galban" wrote in message
oups.com...
|
| Jim Macklin wrote:
| Your postman
| walking the street also often had a gun in his big
leather
| bag. But LBJs postmaster general took them away.
|
|
| Interesting. It could have given a whole new meaning to
the phrase
| "going postal". I'd hate to be working in the sorting
room on
| Publisher's Clearinghouse day :-)
|
| John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)
|


  #39  
Old December 15th 05, 12:41 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

Jim Macklin wrote:

FAR 25 requires that the pressurized aircraft be able to
withstand explosions, engine disintegration and maintain a
livable cabin with a 20 sq. ft. hole. That size hole would
require about 1/2 a ton of bullets.


Cite?

A hole the size of a twin bed is pretty BIG!


Jack
  #40  
Old December 15th 05, 01:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

("Skylune" wrote)
I'm fairly certain that new security requirements have been established
for foreign-born trainees.

I'm not buying the McVeigh/Ryder truck analogy. I'm pretty sure that
people purchasing large quantities of nitrogen based products such as
fertilizer face some type of restrictions or scrutiny today, but I'm not
sure.



The 9-11 terrorists were turned in, by GA, to the FBI and other gov't
agencies with "security requirements." All of this was prior to 9-11. These
various gov't agencies dropped the ball - tripped up by their internal
"security requirements."

GA across the country said - Hey, these guys don't seem right ......nothing.

As far as your other hopeful belief in gov't protecting you, I used to sell
the stuff you're talking about - and deliver it. It is very easy to get your
hands on it, in bag or bulk. Pre-9-11 and post 9-11.


Montblack

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
TSA requirement of Security Awareness Training dancingstar Piloting 3 October 5th 04 02:17 AM
What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixed What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixe Naval Aviation 5 August 21st 04 12:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.