![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Morgans" wrote
"Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:kbWzf.66479$QW2.33865@dukeread08... Most jet aircraft have heated fuel tanks and or use PRIST. The fuel control units are heated by engine oil or electric elements so the screens stay ice free. \\ Yes, I do know all of that, but do smaller jet fueled planes (Malibu and smaller) have heated tanks? I don't know about the Malibu, but the large jet transports that I have flown, B-707, B-727, certainly did not have heated fuel tanks. Yep, the fuel filters had a heating capability using bleed air from the engine compressors.....flightcrew controlled. At higher Mach numbers (.80+), the temperature ram rise at the wing leading edge kept the fuel from waxing under most circumstances. Bob Moore |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Moore" wrote\ I don't know about the Malibu, but the large jet transports that I have flown, B-707, B-727, certainly did not have heated fuel tanks. Yep, the fuel filters had a heating capability using bleed air from the engine compressors.....flightcrew controlled. At higher Mach numbers (.80+), the temperature ram rise at the wing leading edge kept the fuel from waxing under most circumstances. Humm, that surprises me. Do they have excess fuel returned to the tank, which could carry some heat with it? No worries with the Malibu, since the Mach numbers will keep things nice and toasty. g -- Jim in NC |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:44:08 GMT, "AliR" wrote:
Hi everyone, Me and a friend are wondering why jets leave a white trail behind them. My guess is that it's moisture being compressed as it passes through the turbine (because some leave a single trail, while others leave two separate trails). My friend thinks it's because of moisture being cooled as it passes over the wing (Bernoulli effect). While flying a bonanza I have seen a small white trail extending from the wingtip for a little while right after I break through the clouds (descending). Is either one of us right? While I've never seen condensation with my Warrior, I do have some observations regarding condensation trails or contrails. There are different types of contrails. 1. Old WWII newsreels showing B-17s flying over Europe. They're leaving massive contrails from each of those big round engines. I've read articles saying that during the war they tried to avoid altitudes/temperatures where that would occur while over enemy territory since it would make make the aircraft more visible. Just in case anyone thought this phenomenon was exclusively a jet characteristic. http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/resea...s/b17f-10a.jpg 2. TV news coverage of the Space Shuttle landing in Florida (where the air is often more moist than at Edwards). As the shuttle flew admidst a few cloud buildups just before touching down, a trail of cloud appeared at each wingtip. Particularly interesting since the shuttle's engines aren't operating during the landing phase. 3. Scene from the TV show "Black Sheep Squadron" (AKA "Baa Baa Black Sheep") showing the Corsairs as they made a tight turn. A whisp of contrail appeared at each wingtip during the high-g maneuver. 4. At an airshow, the B-1 Bomber come to show off its stuff. As the last part of the demo, it accelerated to just below mach 1 to thrill the crowd. As it flew along, the entire amidships of the aircraft was enshrouded in a white cloud during the time the aircraft was operating at high speed. Didn't leave much of a trail, but impressive phenomenon all the same. 5. Films of the moon launch with the Saturn V rocket. I've seen this footage several times, including I think the movie "Apollo 13." As the rocket accelerates, a ring of cloud appears around the upper end of the rocket. I've noticed the same thing on TV coverage of Space Shuttle launches. Again, no trail. 6. Somewhat unrelated. Once while VFR over a smooth undercast over Asheville, NC (AVL) I saw that nearby Mt. Mitchell was adorned by a lovely lens cloud on its downwind side. While the air where I was was smooth as glass, I can only assume that things wouldn't be so pleasant over near the mountain. Lens clouds are, of course, formed by the pressure changes due to high winds over the mountain, similar to some of the aerodynamic contrails I've noted above. (BTW, in case anyone is wondering, the undercast cleared out as promised by FSS at my destination of TRI.) Just a few examples I remember seeing. Hopefully, someone else can expand on this interesting subject. RK Henry |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Skywise" wrote in message
... Others have already explained how there is water diluted in the fuel, but I think you forgot something. What do you burn that hydrocarbon with? That's right! O2. When the fuel bruns, some of that H combines with some of that O2 and you end up with some H2O. Nearly all of the H should combine with O2 to make H2O, nearly all of the C should combine with O2 to make CO2. 95% to 99% would be ball park numbers. CO goes up as you go rich a lot faster than unburned HC in a piston engine. Contrails are no different than the white water vapor you see behind cars on a cold day. -- Geoff the sea hawk at wow way d0t com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail Spell checking is left as an excercise for the reader. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Macklin wrote:
It is hydroscopic and absorbs water. The water in the "spaces" between the hydrocarbon is where the fungus grows. I still believe that the water contained in the fuel is a small part of the water contained in the exhaust that is formed when the hydrocarbon is combusted. Matt |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote If jet fuel is full of water, how do you get it to burn? When I took chemistry, hydrocarbon fuels contained .... drum roll please ... carbon and hydrogen. No water of any level of significance. \\ Combustion leaves some hydrogen unclaimed, and the oxygen is really happy to claim it, and when it combines two H's, and one O, you get water. Weren't awake during that day of chemistry, were you, Matt? g That was my point precisely. The water isn't IN the fuel. It is formed by the fuel and the oxygen in the air via the combustion process. That isn't at all the same as saying that the water is IN the fuel. Matt |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Whiting" wrote I still believe that the water contained in the fuel is a small part of the water contained in the exhaust that is formed when the hydrocarbon is combusted. Sure, some, but remember, the piston heavy bombers left a real nice contrail, at somewhat lower altitudes, and there was no water in that fuel being burned, no doubt. -- Jim in NC |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Whiting" wrote That was my point precisely. The water isn't IN the fuel. It is formed by the fuel and the oxygen in the air via the combustion process. That isn't at all the same as saying that the water is IN the fuel. My misinterpretation. Sorry. As far as water in the fuel as a contaminate, not a problem getting it to burn, especially at the temps that occur inside a jet engine combustion chamber. Any water in the fuel is very quickly evaporated, then there is no problem getting the combustion to take place. The biggest problem (I'm guessing) would be at startup, when temps are lower, initially. That all changes in a hurry, as hot starts are a big thing to avoid. A couple of things come to mind, when talking about water vapor in the combustion chamber, which is what the water will be at these temperatures. Air has a lot of water vapor in it, before it is compressed, and we all know that works OK. Also, some engines, jet engines included (the Harrier is the best know example) use water injection to control temperatures and add efficiency. The Harrier uses a LOT of water, and although most people don't know it, the water capacity is what determines how long the Harrier can hover on each flight, because without water injection, the engine will overheat. To the other person that said there is not enough left over H to make water with the O in the air, sorry, incorrect. Water and heat are two byproducts of combustion. I wish I remembered enough chemistry to balance the equation. No, I don't! g -- Jim in NC |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote I still believe that the water contained in the fuel is a small part of the water contained in the exhaust that is formed when the hydrocarbon is combusted. Sure, some, but remember, the piston heavy bombers left a real nice contrail, at somewhat lower altitudes, and there was no water in that fuel being burned, no doubt. Precisely my point. The contrail is formed not from water IN the fuel, but by water FORMED when the fuel and air are combusted. Matt |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
To the other person that said there is not enough left over H to make water with the O in the air, sorry, incorrect. Water and heat are two byproducts of combustion. I wish I remembered enough chemistry to balance the equation. No, I don't! g I do remember enough to balance a simple reaction like this. All you need to do is tell me which hydrocarbon you want to combust! I don't know the formula for avgas. :-) Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Flying the Santa Fe Trail Story: long | JJS | Piloting | 19 | April 9th 04 02:02 AM |
FS: 1986 "Fighting Jets" Hardcover Edition Book | J.R. Sinclair | Military Aviation | 3 | January 22nd 04 05:01 PM |
FS: 1986 "Fighting Jets" Hardcover Edition Book | J.R. Sinclair | Military Aviation | 0 | December 2nd 03 05:10 AM |
FS: 1986 "Fighting Jets" Hardcover Edition Book | Jim Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 8th 03 07:43 AM |