United 93 -- see it!

On Fri, 5 May 2006 21:07:59 -0500, "tscottme" blahblah@blah,net wrote:

The facts speak in support of my position in both cases.

"Ehh, all right. Two points, ah, two flats, and a packet of gravel." [1]


#m, Popcorn, anybody?

[1] http://www.mwscomp.com/movies/brian/brian-03.htm
--
"We're out of toilet paper sir!"
http://www.webcrunchers.com/crunch/Play/history/stories/toilet.html

tscottme wrote:
It's not Republicans publishing stories of US
surveillance of Osama's sat phone and al qaeda cell phones.

But it was a Republican who provided the information to the evil libruhl
press, on a live radio feed.

--
Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall
I have nothing but contempt and anger for those who betray the
trust by exposing the name of our sources. They are, in my view,
the most insidious of traitors."
George H.W. Bush, April 16, 1999,

"Raptor" wrote in message
...
tscottme wrote:
It's not Republicans publishing stories of US
surveillance of Osama's sat phone and al qaeda cell phones.
Yes, thank the "liberal" MSM for that.


But it was a Republican who provided the information to the evil libruhl
press, on a live radio feed.

Cite?

--
Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall
I have nothing but contempt and anger for those who betray the
trust by exposing the name of our sources. They are, in my view,
the most insidious of traitors."
George H.W. Bush, April 16, 1999,

Sources?

tscottme wrote:
Unless the hijacker had the good fortune to find an aircraft full of
Democrats. Those passengers would apologize to the hijacker and offer to
fly it into the target of choice while massaging the feet of the hijacker.
After all, 10 generations ago some people the the West still owned slaves
and we haven't raised our minum wage, yadda, yadda, yadda.

Can I have a real name so I can quote you properly in future? Folk over
here don't believe the sort of fanatical extremes USAians will
cheerfully expound about half their
voters-who-could-be-bothered-to-get-off-their-lardy-arses-and-vote, and
you're a useful anchor for the rightward end.


--
He thinks too much: such men are dangerous.
Julius Caesar I:2

Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk

Matt Barrow wrote:
"Raptor" wrote in message
...
tscottme wrote:
It's not Republicans publishing stories of US
surveillance of Osama's sat phone and al qaeda cell phones.
Yes, thank the "liberal" MSM for that.

But it was a Republican who provided the information to the evil libruhl
press, on a live radio feed.

Cite?

Senator Orrin Hatch, 9/11/01, KSL radio based in Salt Lake City.

--
Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall
I have nothing but contempt and anger for those who betray the
trust by exposing the name of our sources. They are, in my view,
the most insidious of traitors."
George H.W. Bush, April 16, 1999,

Sources?

Google & learn.

--
Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall
I have nothing but contempt and anger for those who betray the
trust by exposing the name of our sources. They are, in my view,
the most insidious of traitors."
George H.W. Bush, April 16, 1999,

("Paul J. Adam" wrote)
Can I have a real name so I can quote you properly in future?

He thinks too much: such men are dangerous.
Julius Caesar I:2


"One of the most celebrated people in the world desperate not to be
recognized," - Julie Christie


Montblack :-)

"Bob Fry" wrote in message
...
"Gig" == Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net writes:

Gig And this makes total sense because the film was rated R.

What was in it to earn an "R" rating?



Don't know I haven't seen it yet. (It hasn't opened yet on any of ELDs 13
screens. My guess it would be violence.

On Mon, 8 May 2006 09:33:59 -0500, Gig 601XL Builder wrote:

My guess it would be violence.

The violence in the film, both the initial take-over and when passengers
fight back, is rather brutal.

--

-Jeff B.
zoomie at fastmail dot fm

Did I hit a nerve Mr. Monk? I see from your recent posts that you
communicate with the Arabs too.. Now it all makes sense... Get over it
dude... I could care less if you are offended... This is USENET and I
can give whatever opinion I like. If you don't like my rants then plonk
me in your killfile... I care not... Your empty threats scare me none...
Touch my plane and I'll kill you (Frances from the movie Stripes)... Now
get back in your rental 152 and get the hell out of here...

Below is my real name:
Jon Kraus
'79 Mooney 201
4443H @ TYQ


Flyingmonk wrote:
Jon Kraus wrote:

One thing that is for sure is that airline passengers will NEVER
let some ragheads take over a plane ever again....


Jon, I've never been a Muslim nor a Sikh. I've been a Baptist, a
Mormon and a Buddhist. You calling terrorists "ragheads" offended
me and probably a lot of others.

Back in the late 80's, I had two roommates, one was an Iraqi and the
other was an Iranian. They had friends visiting all the time and
you'd be surprised how many of them were blond-headed and blue-eyed
and speaking fluently both in English and in their native language. Oh
yes, they were clean cut and shaven.

When you are only thinking that your enemies are "ragheads", you
have already missed 30-40% of your potential threat. Yeah, and don't
forget people like Timothy McVeigh.

Another thing, Jon, if I was to come out the way you often do, I would
not advertise my tail number and where I park my plane. Just a
thought.

The Monk

Jon Kraus wrote:
This is USENET and I can give whatever opinion I like.

This is Usenet (not USENET - the word is not an acronym for anything and
shouldn't be in all caps) and if you can't keep your testosterone levels
within manageable range when people respond with their opinions, then you
may want to consider other less stressful pursuits like knitting.

Also, you wrote earlier:

One thing that is for sure is that airline passengers will NEVER
let some ragheads take over a plane ever again....

Sikhs wear head scarves, but they have nothing to do with Islam or Islamic
extremists. Arabs wear keffiyeh, but not all Arabs are Islamic extremists
or even Muslim. And not all Islamic extremists or terrorists are Arab.

Everyone has a right to expressing opinions founded on ignorance, and you
have exercised that right.

My advice is next time the opportunity occurs, try saying "terrorist" or
"religious extremist" rather than "raghead".