![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bela P. Havasreti" wrote in message ... On Fri, 12 May 2006 19:11:52 GMT, Orval Fairbairn wrote: Reality check: Even if everybody were to use the 45 entry, they wouldn't all be usinf the same set of references. Some would be a mile away on downwind, while others would be 1/4 mile away. Then you have a problem! There is simply no excuse for a three mile "final" in a light aircraft! .... There have been two mid-air collisions near my home-base airport over the last several decades. Both occurred at the "convergence" of the entry to the 45 (a popular reporting point for said 45 entry). My one close call to a mid-air (in 29+ years of flying) also occurred at the entry to a 45 at a near-by un-controlled field. http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182100-1.html Pelican's Perch #30: The 45-Degree Zealots |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Orval F wrote:
If you had read my posting completely I did. you would have noticed that you ALWAYS check for traffic in the pattern. I do. After re-reading Deakin's article on pattern ops (thanks Matt) I've had to rethink the upwind entry idea. I know the 45 isn't always the best way, as often times I'll enter on a base or straight in, but always after announcing my position & intent on CTAF. There is simply no excuse for a three mile "final" in a light aircraft Agreed, unless you're in a very busy pattern (been there) or you're extending downwind for someone 'cause you're a nice guy ![]() |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kingfish" wrote in message oups.com... Orval F wrote: If you had read my posting completely I did. you would have noticed that you ALWAYS check for traffic in the pattern. I do. After re-reading Deakin's article on pattern ops (thanks Matt) I've had to rethink the upwind entry idea. I know the 45 isn't always the best way, as often times I'll enter on a base or straight in, but always after announcing my position & intent on CTAF. There is simply no excuse for a three mile "final" in a light aircraft Agreed, unless you're in a very busy pattern (been there) or you're extending downwind for someone 'cause you're a nice guy ![]() ....or the tower says, "...extend your downwind, I'll call your base." |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
...or the tower says, "...extend your downwind, I'll call your base."
That too, but the subject was uncontrolled fields |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Campbell Field Fly-In (9VG)! Oct. 15-16, 2005. Weirwood, Virginia. | [email protected] | Home Built | 0 | October 7th 05 10:26 PM |
Campbell Field Fly-In (9VG)! Oct. 15-16, 2005. Weirwood, Virginia. | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | October 7th 05 10:23 PM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 106 | May 12th 04 07:18 AM |