![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We all had access to any aircraft's information.
A gold mine. Nobody put two and two together? As I wrote previously, I could only see one side of the equation. I realized the investment potential, but didn't know the details. To actually do so would be unethical and perhaps illegal, but I'm still surprised it didn't happen. When you say "I could only see one side...", is that because of your position? (would dispatchers have been able to, had they thought of it?) Jose -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jose wrote: We all had access to any aircraft's information. A gold mine. Nobody put two and two together? As I wrote previously, I could only see one side of the equation. I realized the investment potential, but didn't know the details. To actually do so would be unethical and perhaps illegal, but I'm still surprised it didn't happen. When you say "I could only see one side...", is that because of your position? (would dispatchers have been able to, had they thought of it?) One could speculate as to the target business found in the visited city based on the businesses conducted by the client. Given the potential for diversification, there really is no way to be certain. I suppose the flight crew might hear something and could pass it on, but I have no idea as to the legal issues that could be raised. Ethically, it's all about money. If I am speculating, based on knowing that representatives from company A is visiting city X, it is my risk. For all I know, they could be preparing to sponsor a golf tournament. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One could speculate as to the target business found in the visited city
based on the businesses conducted by the client. The more interesting case is when two execs from different businesses land within half an hour of each other at a third city, when a deal between them might move the market. Jose -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... The stockholders would certainly have an interest in knowing. Well, you think maybe the management will let them know without having to blab to the media? If it's a publicly held company you can't do one without the other. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message ups.com... depending what was in the contract they signed... I'm sure a few lawyers will be interested in these "voluntary resignations".. that means they can't collect un employment benefits These folks will all get unemployment benefits, whether they are eligible or not. Remember: The bureacrats who run our government aren't interested in fixing problems. On the contrary, they depend on more and more people needing their help, in order to thrive. They therefore have an unstoppable will (and, sadly, unchecked ability) to bring more people into their care -- and this provides them with absolute job security. I've seen the system in action (in Iowa and Wisconsin), and it is a farce. If it weren't so sad, it would be laughable. And we ALL pay for it, in the long run. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" Then you just aren't answering the forms correctly. One of my duties is fighting unemployment claims on behalf of our clients. If you answer correctly and keep your ducks in a row the claims are usually refused when they should be. I do this for clients in several states. Most states deny UI claims if the employee quit or was terminated for misconduct. The biggest mistake employers make is trying to be "Nice Guys" and telling an employee who is being terminated for, as an example, excessive absenteeism, "Gee, Jay, we just don't need you anymore." |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You don't pay for unemployment benefits, the companies do in the form
of unemployment insurance premiums. Jay Honeck wrote: depending what was in the contract they signed... I'm sure a few lawyers will be interested in these "voluntary resignations".. that means they can't collect un employment benefits These folks will all get unemployment benefits, whether they are eligible or not. Remember: The bureacrats who run our government aren't interested in fixing problems. On the contrary, they depend on more and more people needing their help, in order to thrive. They therefore have an unstoppable will (and, sadly, unchecked ability) to bring more people into their care -- and this provides them with absolute job security. I've seen the system in action (in Iowa and Wisconsin), and it is a farce. If it weren't so sad, it would be laughable. And we ALL pay for it, in the long run. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Then why have unemployment benefits at all?
Javier wrote: In the long run, as Jay said, we all pay for it, since the cost of those premiums is passed on to us consumers. -jav |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Then why have unemployment benefits at all?
For the same reason we have any insurance - spread the risk. Jose -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe, as you become more familiar with this group (if some of them don't
drive you off), you will recognize that the same few individuals will take the original subjects off topic on a consistant basis. :-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
resume flying after 25 year layoff | David Banahan | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | September 21st 04 06:18 PM |