![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
MoGas could be used in gasoline powered vehicles and
equipment on the airport, to use the 8,000 gallons in a reasonable time. Since many airports are city operated, police cars and such could also use the fuel farm at the airport. "RST Engineering" wrote in message ... | The problem is not getting gasoline without ethanol. I can get as many tank | cars as you wish and have it delivered to you by Friday morning. The | problem is exactly that, you get a tank car (or an 8000 gallon tanker) full, | no less. Using 8000 gallons of a fuel that isn't quite as stable over time | as avgas is the corker. | | When we used to be able to go down to the local gas station with a 55 gallon | drum or tank, it was really quite easy. Getting a small airport to burn | 8000 gallons of auto fuel is not. Not to mention the airport having to make | a new storage tank (can we say permits and lots of time?) and pay for the | project out of "profits". | | Jim | | | | Ethanol is usually blended at the time of being loaded on a tanker | truck, so if the local or state law allows, it is very easy to order a | tanker full of auto fuel without ethanol. It's not added at the | refinery. | | |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:7MqCg.34$SZ3.3@dukeread04... MoGas could be used in gasoline powered vehicles and equipment on the airport, to use the 8,000 gallons in a reasonable time. Since many airports are city operated, police cars and such could also use the fuel farm at the airport. That's actually a very promising solution; at least until the mandate problem can be successfully addressed. Peter "RST Engineering" wrote in message ... | The problem is not getting gasoline without ethanol. I can get as many tank | cars as you wish and have it delivered to you by Friday morning. The | problem is exactly that, you get a tank car (or an 8000 gallon tanker) full, | no less. Using 8000 gallons of a fuel that isn't quite as stable over time | as avgas is the corker. | | When we used to be able to go down to the local gas station with a 55 gallon | drum or tank, it was really quite easy. Getting a small airport to burn | 8000 gallons of auto fuel is not. Not to mention the airport having to make | a new storage tank (can we say permits and lots of time?) and pay for the | project out of "profits". | | Jim | | | | Ethanol is usually blended at the time of being loaded on a tanker | truck, so if the local or state law allows, it is very easy to order a | tanker full of auto fuel without ethanol. It's not added at the | refinery. | | |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm afraid you don't quite get the picture, Jim.
Actually, most "small" country airports are county owned and operated, but your premise of municipal vehicles fueling up is still legitimate. Whether you call them police cars or sheriff cruisers isn't the point. What IS the point is that the airport (for it's own self-preservation) is usually located a few miles from town. To tell every cop car, road grader, utility vehicle that they are going to have to go out to the airport to fuel isn't feasible. Nor is it feasible to have civilians (airplane owners) go to a municipal fuel farm in town and fill up tanks or jugs. First of all, municipalities like counties aren't set up to sell anything to the general public, fuel included. You'd have to generate such a hodge-podge of checks and balances (yes, the treasurer is a real witch when it comes to accountability of funds) that any savings on fuel just went down the dumper. COuld we do it by patch and mend? Possibly. Would it pay for itself? Not unless the mogas sold for approximately what avgas is selling for. Jim "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:7MqCg.34$SZ3.3@dukeread04... MoGas could be used in gasoline powered vehicles and equipment on the airport, to use the 8,000 gallons in a reasonable time. Since many airports are city operated, police cars and such could also use the fuel farm at the airport. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The point is that GOVERNMENT control of supply always screws
up the system. So, when it gets bad, the herd in the big cities demand more government control. That will fix everything, right, NOT. "RST Engineering" wrote in message ... | I'm afraid you don't quite get the picture, Jim. | | Actually, most "small" country airports are county owned and operated, but | your premise of municipal vehicles fueling up is still legitimate. Whether | you call them police cars or sheriff cruisers isn't the point. | | What IS the point is that the airport (for it's own self-preservation) is | usually located a few miles from town. To tell every cop car, road grader, | utility vehicle that they are going to have to go out to the airport to fuel | isn't feasible. | | Nor is it feasible to have civilians (airplane owners) go to a municipal | fuel farm in town and fill up tanks or jugs. First of all, municipalities | like counties aren't set up to sell anything to the general public, fuel | included. You'd have to generate such a hodge-podge of checks and balances | (yes, the treasurer is a real witch when it comes to accountability of | funds) that any savings on fuel just went down the dumper. | | COuld we do it by patch and mend? Possibly. Would it pay for itself? Not | unless the mogas sold for approximately what avgas is selling for. | | Jim | | | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | news:7MqCg.34$SZ3.3@dukeread04... | MoGas could be used in gasoline powered vehicles and | equipment on the airport, to use the 8,000 gallons in a | reasonable time. Since many airports are city operated, | police cars and such could also use the fuel farm at the | airport. | | |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
COuld we do it by patch and mend? Possibly. Would it pay for itself? Not
unless the mogas sold for approximately what avgas is selling for. Although I would prefer that it be cheaper, if given a choice I would buy mogas for my plane if it were available on the field, even if it were the same price as avgas. My O-540 simply runs better with it. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
ps.com... The best way to remove ethanol from gas is for us to affect legislation that would otherwise mandate ethanol in all gasoline, even that used for off-road use. Most congress people are completely unaware that auto fuel is used successfully by a large number of aircraft owners and that ethanol poses a significant safety risk. There are some very powerful lobbying forces behind the new mandates. It's important that we be heard, i.e., we participate. Boaters are also affected by ethanol mandates so it may be helpful to join forces with that community. -----snipped------ You've summed it up rather well. The problem appears to be entirely one of mandates, and the solution is to remove the mandates. Peter |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Dohm" wrote in message ... wrote in message ps.com... The best way to remove ethanol from gas is for us to affect legislation that would otherwise mandate ethanol in all gasoline, even that used for off-road use. Most congress people are completely unaware that auto fuel is used successfully by a large number of aircraft owners and that ethanol poses a significant safety risk. There are some very powerful lobbying forces behind the new mandates. It's important that we be heard, i.e., we participate. Boaters are also affected by ethanol mandates so it may be helpful to join forces with that community. -----snipped------ You've summed it up rather well. The problem appears to be entirely one of mandates, and the solution is to remove the mandates. I'd bet that 99.9% of Congress even knows it is an issue. The AOPA and EAA better get a letter writing campaign going. It is a lot easier to stop mandates before they are in place than it is to get one removed. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The biggest issue is the reduction in power. You can regain the power by
rejetting the carb or injectors and assuring sufficient intake airflow, but then the fuel flow is much higher.....and your range is poor. The fuel system might need modification to insure all components are compatible with ethanol. One example is: the O-rings in your fuel tank selector might not tolerate ethanol, swelling and making the fuel selector tight or even locked in one position. Regards, John Severyn @KLVK "Jay Honeck" wrote in message ups.com... The adding of ethanol to gasoline has made the auto-gas STC unusable for many aircraft owners, nationwide. So far, we're okay (in Iowa, which is pretty funny) and are able to purchase untainted mogas -- but the long-range situation seems untenable. We, as a nation, are inexorably being forced toward the addition of alcohol into ALL gasoline, so it seems... On the Cherokee 235 user's group, there is a guy who's been successfully using ethanol-gas in his aircraft. It's ruined his fiberglass tip tanks, but he apparently expected this to happen. Otherwise, the engine is running fine, or so he reports. (Personally, I think he's crazy, ruining tip tanks that run close to $4K *apiece*, but that's just me...) His experience has led to a more interesting (to me) discussion about the possibility of REMOVING ethanol from gasoline. Several ideas have been postulated (evaporation; heating; adding water), but none of them sound particularly safe or easy. Any chemists out there? Anyone know a way to remove the ethanol from mogas, so that we may safely use it in our aircraft? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message ups.com... The adding of ethanol to gasoline has made the auto-gas STC unusable for many aircraft owners, nationwide. So far, we're okay (in Iowa, which is pretty funny) and are able to purchase untainted mogas -- but the long-range situation seems untenable. We, as a nation, are inexorably being forced toward the addition of alcohol into ALL gasoline, so it seems... On the Cherokee 235 user's group, there is a guy who's been successfully using ethanol-gas in his aircraft. It's ruined his fiberglass tip tanks, but he apparently expected this to happen. Otherwise, the engine is running fine, or so he reports. (Personally, I think he's crazy, ruining tip tanks that run close to $4K *apiece*, but that's just me...) His experience has led to a more interesting (to me) discussion about the possibility of REMOVING ethanol from gasoline. Several ideas have been postulated (evaporation; heating; adding water), but none of them sound particularly safe or easy. Any chemists out there? Anyone know a way to remove the ethanol from mogas, so that we may safely use it in our aircraft? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" Hey Jay, I added your web site to my links page! http://www.aircraftdelivery.net/links.htm |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9 Aug 2006 08:13:11 -0700, "Jay Honeck" wrote:
The adding of ethanol to gasoline has made the auto-gas STC unusable for many aircraft owners, nationwide. So far, we're okay (in Iowa, which is pretty funny) and are able to purchase untainted mogas -- but the long-range situation seems untenable. We, as a nation, are inexorably being forced toward the addition of alcohol into ALL gasoline, so it seems... On the Cherokee 235 user's group, there is a guy who's been successfully using ethanol-gas in his aircraft. It's ruined his Then he's most likely doing it illegally as he's not using a know auto gas which means no STC. fiberglass tip tanks, but he apparently expected this to happen. Otherwise, the engine is running fine, or so he reports. (Personally, I think he's crazy, ruining tip tanks that run close to $4K *apiece*, but that's just me...) Crazy is not quite the word I'd use. It's not just those fiberglass tips, seals and O-rings that are attacked by ethanol. He's looking for far more problems than tip tanks. BTW he might want to consider where the disolved resin and some fiberglass went. I wonder what his fuel filter and gascolator look like inside. His experience has led to a more interesting (to me) discussion about the possibility of REMOVING ethanol from gasoline. Several ideas have been postulated (evaporation; heating; adding water), but none of them sound particularly safe or easy. Or smart. Alcohol, in addition to burning cleaner is also an octane booster. That means even if you sucessfully remove it, you are left with a lower octane gas and no STC which probably means no insurance. Any chemists out there? Anyone know a way to remove the ethanol from mogas, so that we may safely use it in our aircraft? And what do you do to raise the octane back up? Yes there is a relatively easy way to remove alcohol from gas that just takes a bit of filtering after the process. Remember Alcohol is hydroscopic. But I repeat, it's no longer car gas so no STC which probably means no insurance and how much lower octane can the specific engine handle. Have a problem and the FAA, Insurance company, and lawyers will not be on your side. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ethanol & capacitance fuel-level sensors | Adam Aulick | Home Built | 4 | May 20th 06 03:28 PM |
The effects of Ethanol on... | ventus2 | Home Built | 35 | May 8th 06 05:45 AM |
MoGas users: Ethanol replacing MTBE | John | Piloting | 167 | May 5th 06 08:31 PM |
Ethanol Mandate for Iowa? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 155 | October 4th 05 03:17 PM |
Ethanol Powered Airplane Certified In Brazil | Victor | Owning | 4 | March 30th 05 09:10 PM |