![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is it cheating/advisable/forbidden/useless to use the rudder alone to
accomplish the very last seconds of runway alignment on landing? As I approach the landing point it becomes very difficult to turn in the usual way just to improve alignment. Using rudder alone can line me up perfectly right quick, but I don't know if that's the proper technique, and I have to hold the rudder going in. I know that the rudder can (and should?) be used to deal with crosswinds, but I'm talking about landing in calm air and just being an aircraft-width or so away from the centerline (which on narrow runways or with large aircraft might mean one set of wheels on the grass). As I get closer I'm afraid to roll the aircraft because a wing might fall too low, or ground effect might do something unpleasant, or something like that. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think that would work very well. If the aircraft is already
lined up with the runway heading, using rudder to move the aircraft laterally will cause you touchdown in a crab. You should use the aileron to manuever the plan laterally and use the rudder to keep the nose pointing to the runway heading, the same way you do in a cross wind landing. If the runway is very long, add a little bit power when you do this so you'll have a bit more time. If the runway is short and you doubt that you can get it straighten out, go around. The fear of banking the plane close to ground is misplaced. It's actually easier to do a smoother touchdown when one wheel touches the ground first, even if it's a bit firm. That's because a single wheel firm touch-down will cause the plane to roll to the other direction (so the other wheel will also touch shortly after), and that rolling motion absorbs some of the energy caused by a firm touchdown and make it feels less firm. Mxsmanic wrote: I know that the rudder can (and should?) be used to deal with crosswinds, but I'm talking about landing in calm air and just being an aircraft-width or so away from the centerline (which on narrow runways or with large aircraft might mean one set of wheels on the grass). As I get closer I'm afraid to roll the aircraft because a wing might fall too low, or ground effect might do something unpleasant, or something like that. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you talking about computer games or flying a real airplane?
The flight model of a lot of games does not come close to the real thing unless you are using one that requires a work station to run. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Viperdoc,
Are you talking about computer games or flying a real airplane? Haven't you read his postings? He doesn't fly, doesn't want to, insists he can't afford to, thinks it is dangerous, unpleasant and so on. This guy is NEVER talking about flying. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i know you're doing this on a machine and i don't know how it's set up
but with high wing light aircraft ( my only experience) you really can only move the airplane track left or right with ailerons. punching the rudders just moves the nose left or right. now, that's short-term. eventually, the rudder will send the airplane left or right but that takes a while. kinda like skidding around a turn in a car. also, on a high wing at least, you've got a lot of room to push it over before you have a wing hit the runway (or light or weeds or whatever). if the body of the aircraft is already over the runway but the nose isn't then "kicking it in" with the rudder is standard. good luck dan Mxsmanic wrote: Is it cheating/advisable/forbidden/useless to use the rudder alone to accomplish the very last seconds of runway alignment on landing? As I approach the landing point it becomes very difficult to turn in the usual way just to improve alignment. Using rudder alone can line me up perfectly right quick, but I don't know if that's the proper technique, and I have to hold the rudder going in. I know that the rudder can (and should?) be used to deal with crosswinds, but I'm talking about landing in calm air and just being an aircraft-width or so away from the centerline (which on narrow runways or with large aircraft might mean one set of wheels on the grass). As I get closer I'm afraid to roll the aircraft because a wing might fall too low, or ground effect might do something unpleasant, or something like that. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Even in calm winds pilots use the same techniques to "slide" over to
the runway they use in a cross wind. In truth you probably don't know if your lack of alignment is a result of cross wind or poor roll out. The two techniques used are "crab" in which you hold the nose into the wind and the kick it out before touch down and "slip" in which you hold the up wind wing down and hold the nose in ailgnment with the runway using rudder. There are pro's and con's to each. The "crab and kick" is pretty much the only way to go in aircraft with swept back wings because they aren't excited about slipping and taught by ex-military and airline instructors. The "slip" is pretty much the only way to go with light tailwheel planes because it takes near superhuman ability to straighten these aircraft on the runway after an upset as extream as the "kick". Planes in between can go either way. -Robert, CFII |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No it is not cheating. Many airplanes cannot use a wing down method for
x-wind landing. This is because their engines would scrape the runway. Karl "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Is it cheating/advisable/forbidden/useless to use the rudder alone to accomplish the very last seconds of runway alignment on landing? As I approach the landing point it becomes very difficult to turn in the usual way just to improve alignment. Using rudder alone can line me up perfectly right quick, but I don't know if that's the proper technique, and I have to hold the rudder going in. I know that the rudder can (and should?) be used to deal with crosswinds, but I'm talking about landing in calm air and just being an aircraft-width or so away from the centerline (which on narrow runways or with large aircraft might mean one set of wheels on the grass). As I get closer I'm afraid to roll the aircraft because a wing might fall too low, or ground effect might do something unpleasant, or something like that. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:46:08 +0200, Mxsmanic
wrote: Is it cheating/advisable/forbidden/useless to use the rudder alone to accomplish the very last seconds of runway alignment on landing? Some argue that it's preferable to use the rudder in an instrument approach for minor heading changes. In fact, when I took my instrument rating check ride, the examiner chided me for rolling to minor heading changes instead of just using the rudder, though he signed me off anyway. After reading Langewiesche ("Stick and Rudder") I concluded that it's preferable to use coordinated turns to help avoid disorienting the inner ear. Personal preference. The choice may also depend upon the airplane. I know that the rudder can (and should?) be used to deal with crosswinds, but I'm talking about landing in calm air and just being an aircraft-width or so away from the centerline (which on narrow runways or with large aircraft might mean one set of wheels on the grass). As I get closer I'm afraid to roll the aircraft because a wing might fall too low, or ground effect might do something unpleasant, or something like that. IRL, by the time that you're that close to touchdown, you ought to already have heading and centerline alignment pretty well nailed. If you're worried about dragging a wing, landing in the grass, or knocking over the glideslope transmitter or something, then your approach is so out of shape that you probably ought to miss it and go around. RK Henry |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RK Henry writes:
Some argue that it's preferable to use the rudder in an instrument approach for minor heading changes. In fact, when I took my instrument rating check ride, the examiner chided me for rolling to minor heading changes instead of just using the rudder, though he signed me off anyway. If I try to use the rudder alone for a heading change in flight, the aircraft just snaps back to its previous heading when I center the rudder again. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
If I try to use the rudder alone for a heading change in flight, the aircraft just snaps back to its previous heading when I center the rudder again. Try it in a 172. You CAN turn with rudder only. It's not coordinated, but it still turns. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SWRFI - next weekend! | Richard Lamb | Home Built | 13 | May 10th 06 03:45 AM |
DG Rudder AD - DONE! - Notes from my work | ContestID67 | Soaring | 0 | March 30th 06 07:36 PM |
Southern California airports have worst runway safety records | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | November 26th 05 04:48 PM |
Information on A310 that lost it's rudder enroute to Canada from Cuba | Corky Scott | Piloting | 3 | March 27th 05 03:49 PM |
Rwy incursions | Hankal | Piloting | 10 | November 16th 03 02:33 AM |