aerobatic C172?

"gt" wrote in message
ps.com...
On May 2, 2:30 pm, wrote:
On 1-May-2007, gt wrote:

I own a 1960 Cessna 172 with 2500 hours on the airframe. It is not
rated for aerobatic flight, but the positive and negative G loads that
it is approved for far exceed the normal G forces associated with a
well-executed barrel roll.

Has anyone heard of this maneuver being performed in a 1960 172?


... Most probably it wouldn't. I asked a simple question about the
performance of a 1960 Cessna 172.
...

Simple answer. No, I've never heard of anyone doing barrel roll a 1960
Cessna 172.

--
Geoff
The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com
remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail
When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate.