A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Ratings for an Amphibian



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old June 17th 07, 03:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Montblack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 972
Default Ratings for an Amphibian

("John Godwin" wrote)
Since the Mermaid has a Vh of greater than 87 KCAS you must have:
A Sport Pilot Certificate with an AP-8 Endorsement ... or
A Recreational Pilot Certificate with SES rating ... or
A Private, Commercial, or ATP with SES rating.



I found it on page 13 of:
"CFI’s Guide to Sport Pilot and Light-Sport Aircraft"

Appendix 4
Sets of Aircraft

Example: A sport pilot received all of her training in an Aeronca Champ. She
is signed off for the set "Airplane, 87 KCAS, tailwheel" (set "AP-2"). She
is able to fly, without any additional training or endorsement, any
tailwheel airplane that is sport pilot eligible and has a VH of 87KCAS or
below.

She is interested in buying one of the new, fast tricycle-geared S-LSAs.
Before she can act as PIC of the aircraft she purchases, she will need to
train with a CFI in a sport pilot-eligible tricycle geared aircraft with a
VH of 87 KCAS and receive an endorsement for aircraft set "AP-5".

A sport pilot could end up with up to 8 logbook endorsements in order to fly
every type of sport pilot-eligible airplane.


Airplane: 87 KCAS (VH) or BELOW
-----------------------------------------------
Tricycle gear ....... (AP-1)
Tailwheel ............. (AP-2)
Ski equipped ...... (AP-3)
Float equipped ... (AP-4)

Airplane: 87 KCAS (VH) and ABOVE
-------------------------------------------------
Tricycle gear ........ (AP-5)
Tailwheel .............. (AP-6)
Ski equipped ....... (AP-7)
Float equipped .... (AP-8)
Turbine ................. (AP-9)

http://tinyurl.com/2f9xl3
(same link as below)

http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache...t=fire fox-a?


Bad Paul-Mont. Bad
Just checking who's checking :-)


  #32  
Old June 18th 07, 02:13 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dave S
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 406
Default Ratings for an Amphibian

Scott Skylane wrote:
As for the 1.1 definition of "Class", if
anything, a person might interpret that to mean you *do* have to have a
sea rating to operate a seaplane, regardless of where you take off and
land.


If you operate an amphib solely off of land, you do not need a seaplane
rating.

If you operate an amphib solely off of water, you do not need a
landplane rating.

Although capable of conversion, an airplane can occupy only one class at
one time. There is no special rule for amphibs.

Once you land on water, its a seaplane... until it lands on land
again..then its a landplane.

Dave
  #34  
Old June 18th 07, 02:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dave S
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 406
Default Ratings for an Amphibian


I would think you would need a sea rating to one or the other.

Which brings up another question, can one hold two different types
of certificates, i.e. private single engine land and light sport
rotorcraft, at the same time?


Its not uncommon to see that at all...

My father had among other things,
Rotorcraft - Commercial
AMEL - ATP
ASEL - Commercial
Instrument, Airplane

Each of those was a different checkride at some point in time.
  #35  
Old June 24th 07, 06:31 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Ratings for an Amphibian


"Dave S" wrote

If its experimental, and Im prolly wrong here...,

but you are not required to have category and class in an experimental..
UNLESS passengers are carried.

In other words, you can go experiment on your own, but you have to be
rated to take someone with you.


True, I believe.

We had a FAA type guy at a local EAA fly in speaking on inspecting new
homebuilts, and that question was asked.

His response was yes, that was true, but he said that if a guy had built a
seaplane, and did not have a seaplane ticket, he would assign a fly off
period with restrictions like, "to be flown only on the first Tuesday of the
month, within a 2 mile radius of the airport (or seaport) on a day with a
full moon the following night, with a fly off time of 100 hours."

In other words, you will have to have the rating, as far as he is concerned.
--
Jim in NC


  #36  
Old June 24th 07, 06:33 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Ratings for an Amphibian


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote In fact, I even instructed in a
non-amphib Cessna 185 completely
legally without ever having had a seaplane rating..


How's that for a brain teaser?


Bertie


I hope it was before August 1997...


Doesn't matter when, It was legal, definitely. Local GADO sed so too.


Took off on floats from snow or wet grass.
--
Jim in NC


  #37  
Old June 24th 07, 10:59 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default Ratings for an Amphibian

"Morgans" wrote in news:0nnfi.1911$es3.939
@newsfe02.lga:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote In fact, I even instructed in a
non-amphib Cessna 185 completely
legally without ever having had a seaplane rating..


How's that for a brain teaser?


Bertie

I hope it was before August 1997...


Doesn't matter when, It was legal, definitely. Local GADO sed so too.


Took off on floats from snow or wet grass.



Nope, but a good one I sure never would have thought of.
No, I was giving instrument instruction to a guy who had a 185 on floats.
We would do an approach into the airport near the lake where he parked the
thing and then divert from minimums over to the lake.
He did most of his instrument training like this.


Bertie
  #38  
Old June 24th 07, 12:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Judah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 936
Default Ratings for an Amphibian

Bertie the Bunyip wrote in
:

Nope, but a good one I sure never would have thought of.
No, I was giving instrument instruction to a guy who had a 185 on
floats. We would do an approach into the airport near the lake where he
parked the thing and then divert from minimums over to the lake.
He did most of his instrument training like this.


If you aren't rated in the plane, how can you instruct in it? Or even be a
safety pilot?

"§ 91.109 Flight instruction; Simulated instrument flight and certain
flight tests. ...
(b) No person may operate a civil aircraft in simulated instrument flight
unless—

(1) The other control seat is occupied by a safety pilot who possesses at
least a private pilot certificate with category and class ratings
appropriate to the aircraft being flown."


Do you have category and class ratings appropriate to a Cessna 185 with
floats?
  #39  
Old June 25th 07, 03:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default Ratings for an Amphibian

Judah wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote in
:

Nope, but a good one I sure never would have thought of.
No, I was giving instrument instruction to a guy who had a 185 on
floats. We would do an approach into the airport near the lake where
he parked the thing and then divert from minimums over to the lake.
He did most of his instrument training like this.


If you aren't rated in the plane, how can you instruct in it? Or even
be a safety pilot?


A, it's called an airplane.

B. I only instucted him in instrument flight, so the boots didn't matter
since inever landed it.

"§ 91.109 Flight instruction; Simulated instrument flight and
certain flight tests. ...
(b) No person may operate a civil aircraft in simulated instrument
flight unless—

(1) The other control seat is occupied by a safety pilot who possesses
at least a private pilot certificate with category and class ratings
appropriate to the aircraft being flown."


Do you have category and class ratings appropriate to a Cessna 185
with floats?




Nope, but the FAA decided it was legit so we did it.


Bertie
  #40  
Old June 25th 07, 03:33 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Judah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 936
Default Ratings for an Amphibian

Bertie the Bunyip wrote in news:Xns995A219B0F554****upropeeh@
207.14.116.130:

Judah wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote in
:

Nope, but a good one I sure never would have thought of.
No, I was giving instrument instruction to a guy who had a 185 on
floats. We would do an approach into the airport near the lake where
he parked the thing and then divert from minimums over to the lake.
He did most of his instrument training like this.


If you aren't rated in the plane, how can you instruct in it? Or even
be a safety pilot?


A, it's called an airplane.


"plane" Dictionary.com. Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Random House,
Inc. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/plane (accessed: June 24,
2007).
–noun
5. Aeronautics. a. an airplane or a hydroplane: to take a plane to Dallas.

B. I only instucted him in instrument flight, so the boots didn't matter
since inever landed it.

"§ 91.109 Flight instruction; Simulated instrument flight and
certain flight tests. ...
(b) No person may operate a civil aircraft in simulated instrument
flight unless—

(1) The other control seat is occupied by a safety pilot who possesses
at least a private pilot certificate with category and class ratings
appropriate to the aircraft being flown."


Do you have category and class ratings appropriate to a Cessna 185
with floats?


Nope, but the FAA decided it was legit so we did it.


I highly suspect that the entire FAA didn't decide it was legit, in
contrast to the paragraph I quoted earlier. I rather suspect that some guy
who works at a FSDO gave you his opinion over the phone, and had you been
caught in the act by another guy from another FSDO (or maybe even the same
FSDO), who happened to be a hardass, he might not have been so lenient.

As I have demonstrated above, one can find a source to say nearly anything,
but that doesn't make it accurate. In the relatively few years that I have
been involved in aviation, I have found this to be especially true with
respect to piloting, FAA regulations, and Aerodynamics.

There is more folklore being spewed about aviation than all the old wives
tales ever conceived, let alone spoken.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
An amphibian that sank? Flyingmonk Home Built 44 April 26th 06 09:54 PM
An amphibian that sank? Flyingmonk Piloting 40 April 26th 06 09:32 PM
Amphibian VTOL? Flyingmonk Piloting 6 January 6th 06 12:18 AM
Amphibian info need Alain Theroux - 2i Solutions Owning 0 July 21st 05 02:21 AM
New amphibian aircraft Sten-Anders Fellman Products 0 August 28th 04 11:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.