A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

VOR approach SMO



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 23rd 07, 11:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
karl gruber[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 396
Default VOR approach SMO

Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!

Karl



"pgbnh" wrote in message
news
I think all but one of the posters have missed the fact that the MDA is not
1120 but 680. If indeed the vis was 3 miles, then the runway should have
been in sight from the MDA of 680 feet about a mile OUTSIDE of Culve.
(Remember what you can do once you have the runway in sight????) At which
point it's not a particularly big deal to lose 500 feet to land on the
numbers. Maybe even crossing Culve at 3-400 feet agl.
"Hamish Reid" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"karl gruber" wrote:

I see no problem with the weather 800/3 as you point out. Inside BEVEY
drive
down to 680 outside CULVE, and have 3 miles to descend 505 feet. Any jet
will do that all day long.


So you'd drop below 1120 *outside* CULVE? Even if you were just cutting
things a little fine, the 2.4 miles from CULVE is from the *far end* of
the runway you're landing on... and if you were descending below 1120
just inside BEVEY in IMC, you might be in more trouble than you'd like.

Hamish





  #2  
Old July 23rd 07, 11:23 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Doug Semler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 175
Default VOR approach SMO

On Jul 23, 5:07 pm, "pgbnh" wrote:
I think all but one of the posters have missed the fact that the MDA is not
1120 but 680. If indeed the vis was 3 miles, then the runway should have
been in sight from the MDA of 680 feet about a mile OUTSIDE of Culve.
(Remember what you can do once you have the runway in sight????) At which
point it's not a particularly big deal to lose 500 feet to land on the
numbers. Maybe even crossing Culve at 3-400 feet agl


Please, tell me how you read the plate in a way that you can cross
CULVE below 1120 when you don't have the airport in sight?
Note I am not an IA pilot, but I really want to understand this. My
reading of the plate is:

Cross CULVE at or above 1120. If you are DME equipped and radar, you
can then descend to 680. Otherwise you gotta remain at 1120. If you
get to the VOR before seeing the airport, you execute missed.

Now if the conditions are 800 overcast 3mi, how can you see the
airport before hitting CULVE unless you are below the crossing
restriction?

  #3  
Old July 23rd 07, 11:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
karl gruber[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 396
Default VOR approach SMO

You can cross CULVE at 680 because the chart says "CULVE DME/RADAR MINIMA*
680-1"
You can descend to 680 past BEVEY. Look at the chart...........that's how
it's read.

Karl


"Doug Semler" wrote in message
ps.com...
On Jul 23, 5:07 pm, "pgbnh" wrote:
I think all but one of the posters have missed the fact that the MDA is
not
1120 but 680. If indeed the vis was 3 miles, then the runway should have
been in sight from the MDA of 680 feet about a mile OUTSIDE of Culve.
(Remember what you can do once you have the runway in sight????) At
which
point it's not a particularly big deal to lose 500 feet to land on the
numbers. Maybe even crossing Culve at 3-400 feet agl


Please, tell me how you read the plate in a way that you can cross
CULVE below 1120 when you don't have the airport in sight?
Note I am not an IA pilot, but I really want to understand this. My
reading of the plate is:

Cross CULVE at or above 1120. If you are DME equipped and radar, you
can then descend to 680. Otherwise you gotta remain at 1120. If you
get to the VOR before seeing the airport, you execute missed.

Now if the conditions are 800 overcast 3mi, how can you see the
airport before hitting CULVE unless you are below the crossing
restriction?



  #4  
Old July 23rd 07, 11:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
pgbnh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 51
Default VOR approach SMO

Note this is a VOR or GPS approach. Sorry if I just assumed that there would
be on-board EITHER a DME or an IFR certified GPS that would provide the
distance-measuring requirements of the DME/Radar minima. Pretty good chance
the jet in question had both. And maybe you understand this, but youir
reference to Radar implies that maybe you do not. The 'Radar' reference is
NOT referring to whether the plane is radar equipped, but rather whether
there is radar coverage from the ground. Which in fact should allow an
aircraft WITHOUT DME to descend to 680 (if receiving advisories from the
tower/approach)
"Doug Semler" wrote in message
ps.com...
On Jul 23, 5:07 pm, "pgbnh" wrote:
I think all but one of the posters have missed the fact that the MDA is
not
1120 but 680. If indeed the vis was 3 miles, then the runway should have
been in sight from the MDA of 680 feet about a mile OUTSIDE of Culve.
(Remember what you can do once you have the runway in sight????) At
which
point it's not a particularly big deal to lose 500 feet to land on the
numbers. Maybe even crossing Culve at 3-400 feet agl


Please, tell me how you read the plate in a way that you can cross
CULVE below 1120 when you don't have the airport in sight?
Note I am not an IA pilot, but I really want to understand this. My
reading of the plate is:

Cross CULVE at or above 1120. If you are DME equipped and radar, you
can then descend to 680. Otherwise you gotta remain at 1120. If you
get to the VOR before seeing the airport, you execute missed.

Now if the conditions are 800 overcast 3mi, how can you see the
airport before hitting CULVE unless you are below the crossing
restriction?



  #5  
Old July 23rd 07, 11:47 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default VOR approach SMO

On Jul 23, 2:07 pm, "pgbnh" wrote:
I think all but one of the posters have missed the fact that the MDA is not
1120 but 680.


Generally people who's method of explaining things starts by insulting
them, telling them that they don't know what they are doing, and then
explaining that he's much smarter than everyone else have a more
difficult time explaining things. Sadly, the one poster you referenced
uses this has his methodology. Let's all pray that he's not a CFI.

-Robert


  #6  
Old July 24th 07, 01:02 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
B
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 73
Default VOR approach SMO

pgbnh wrote:

I think all but one of the posters have missed the fact that the MDA is not
1120 but 680. If indeed the vis was 3 miles, then the runway should have
been in sight from the MDA of 680 feet about a mile OUTSIDE of Culve.
(Remember what you can do once you have the runway in sight????) At which
point it's not a particularly big deal to lose 500 feet to land on the
numbers. Maybe even crossing Culve at 3-400 feet agl.
"Hamish Reid" wrote in message
...


The MDA is 1120 unless you have DME. If you have DME then the MDA is
680 once you pass CULVE. You cannot descend below 1120 prior to CULVE
even if you see the runway unless you either cancel, get a contact
approach, or a visual approach.

Having said that, when the weather is good, folks who know the airport
descend out of 1120 on the 4 degree PAPI. But, sometimes it is 600 and
1 around there.
  #7  
Old July 24th 07, 01:28 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
pgbnh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 51
Default VOR approach SMO

OK, now I admit to being confused.

I read the chart as 'the MDA is 1120 unless equipped with dme or receiving
radar advisories so that CULVE can be indentified, in which case the MDA is
680.' The asterisk next to the 1120 is, I believe, indicating that the MDA
is 1120 unless (see the other half of the asterisk below) DME or Radar
equipped, inwhich case it is 680. With DME I do not see a requirement to
stay at 1120 to CULVE and THEN descend to 680. Rather, I believe it says I
can descend to 680 (with DME) once I pass BEVEY.

I also do not agree with the statement "You cannot descend below 1120 prior
to CULVE
even if you see the runway unless you either cancel, get a contact
approach, or a visual approach.". 91.175 clearly states that I can descend
below MDA when I have the runway environment (lightts, etc) in sight. No
restrictions on when I can begin a descent below MDA. Were there a VDP,
different situation, but no VDP on this approach.

So I stand by what I said earlier. I can be at 680 BEFORE CULVE, AND, if I
have the runway environment, I can be below 680 even earlier.

I also reserve the right to be wrong

"B" wrote in message ...
pgbnh wrote:

I think all but one of the posters have missed the fact that the MDA is
not 1120 but 680. If indeed the vis was 3 miles, then the runway should
have been in sight from the MDA of 680 feet about a mile OUTSIDE of
Culve. (Remember what you can do once you have the runway in sight????)
At which point it's not a particularly big deal to lose 500 feet to land
on the numbers. Maybe even crossing Culve at 3-400 feet agl.
"Hamish Reid" wrote in message
...


The MDA is 1120 unless you have DME. If you have DME then the MDA is 680
once you pass CULVE. You cannot descend below 1120 prior to CULVE even if
you see the runway unless you either cancel, get a contact approach, or a
visual approach.

Having said that, when the weather is good, folks who know the airport
descend out of 1120 on the 4 degree PAPI. But, sometimes it is 600 and 1
around there.



  #8  
Old July 24th 07, 01:30 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
karl gruber[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 396
Default VOR approach SMO


"
The MDA is 1120 unless you have DME. If you have DME then the MDA is 680
once you pass CULVE. You cannot descend below 1120 prior to CULVE even if
you see the runway unless you either cancel, get a contact approach, or a
visual approach.


If you have DME, IFRGPS, or ATC Radar, you can descend to 680 past
BEVEY............that is simply what that chart reads.

Karl


  #9  
Old July 24th 07, 02:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Hamish Reid
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 92
Default VOR approach SMO

In article ,
"pgbnh" wrote:

I think all but one of the posters have missed the fact that the MDA is not
1120 but 680.


Assuming radar or DME, yes.

If indeed the vis was 3 miles, then the runway should have
been in sight from the MDA of 680 feet about a mile OUTSIDE of Culve.


But you can't go below 1120 until CULVE unless you're on the visual. The
chart's not particularly ambiguous about this...

(Remember what you can do once you have the runway in sight????)


You generally have to be below the ceiling before the runway's in
sight... At 1120, with 800/3, you're presumably still in the stratus.

At which
point it's not a particularly big deal to lose 500 feet to land on the
numbers. Maybe even crossing Culve at 3-400 feet agl.


Having done the approach for real, I didn't find the descents
particularly challenging, but they do require a bit of forethought,
that's for sure. The hardest part was being dumped inside DARTS at
6,000'....

Hamish

"Hamish Reid" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"karl gruber" wrote:

I see no problem with the weather 800/3 as you point out. Inside BEVEY
drive
down to 680 outside CULVE, and have 3 miles to descend 505 feet. Any jet
will do that all day long.


So you'd drop below 1120 *outside* CULVE? Even if you were just cutting
things a little fine, the 2.4 miles from CULVE is from the *far end* of
the runway you're landing on... and if you were descending below 1120
just inside BEVEY in IMC, you might be in more trouble than you'd like.

Hamish



  #10  
Old July 23rd 07, 11:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
karl gruber[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 396
Default VOR approach SMO

Once inside BEVEY you're good for 680. There is no glideslope and it's "Dive
and Drive." That's why the pros make it in with no trouble, they can read
charts.

Karl

Karl
"Hamish Reid" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"karl gruber" wrote:

I see no problem with the weather 800/3 as you point out. Inside BEVEY
drive
down to 680 outside CULVE, and have 3 miles to descend 505 feet. Any jet
will do that all day long.


So you'd drop below 1120 *outside* CULVE? Even if you were just cutting
things a little fine, the 2.4 miles from CULVE is from the *far end* of
the runway you're landing on... and if you were descending below 1120
just inside BEVEY in IMC, you might be in more trouble than you'd like.

Hamish



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SDF Approach? A Guy Called Tyketto Piloting 9 April 18th 07 02:32 AM
First LPV approach Viperdoc[_4_] Instrument Flight Rules 0 March 5th 07 04:23 AM
ILS or LOC approach? Dan Wegman Instrument Flight Rules 17 May 10th 05 12:41 AM
No FAF on an ILS approach...? John Harper Instrument Flight Rules 7 December 24th 03 04:54 AM
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach John Clonts Instrument Flight Rules 45 November 20th 03 06:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.