![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm glad I'm on this side of the pond.
Me, too. My son finished his for right around $5K. With a price differential that great, any European flight student would be way ahead financially to simply rent a suite here while attending our local flight school. We had a French fellow do that here last spring, well before the run-up of the Euro; it makes even more sense now. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck schrieb:
We had a French fellow do that here last spring, well before the run-up of the Euro; it makes even more sense now. except for all the loops one has to jump through like fingerprinting, visa (!), etc. for a visa you have to show up in person at the embassy (earlier one was able to do that by mail, BTDT), this costs you at least 1 day (including "interviews"). for a student visa you need a M1, but if you go Part 61 the flight school is not able to issue the required papers (and you have to chose your flight school beforehand, changes are close to impossible now, BTDT, too). Then you need the fingerprinting and the flight school has to report you to the government/FAA. Each involved party in this process, including the immigration officer can make your plans go south. Then - not flying related - you have to deal with the new sentiments against foreigners. So to sum it up: Canada or South Africa are a very good alternative. #m |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, Martin Hotze said:
So to sum it up: Canada or South Africa are a very good alternative. I know. I'm a Canadian citizen, but a permanent resident in the US. I've gotten conflicting answers as to whether getting a float plane rating counts as a new basic license (in which case I'd have to jump through all the foreign pilot hoops) or an add-on to my existing ASEL (in which case I don't). Depending on which answer is right, I might have to go up to Georgian Bay Airways instead of going down to Jack Brown's. -- Paul Tomblin http://blog.xcski.com/ "I'm cruising down the Information Superhighway in high gear, surfing the waves of the Digital Ocean, exploring the uncharted regions of Cyberspace. Actually I'm sitting on my butt staring at a computer screen." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 29, 3:01*pm, (Paul Tomblin) wrote:
In a previous article, Martin Hotze said: So to sum it up: Canada or South Africa are a very good alternative. See for example: http://www.harvsair.com/site/information/jaa-faq.html These people have been doing flight training for many years, and claim half the price of the same thing in Europe. John Halpenny |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Hotze writes:
except for all the loops one has to jump through like fingerprinting, visa (!), etc. for a visa you have to show up in person at the embassy (earlier one was able to do that by mail, BTDT), this costs you at least 1 day (including "interviews"). for a student visa you need a M1, but if you go Part 61 the flight school is not able to issue the required papers (and you have to chose your flight school beforehand, changes are close to impossible now, BTDT, too). Then you need the fingerprinting and the flight school has to report you to the government/FAA. Each involved party in this process, including the immigration officer can make your plans go south. Then - not flying related - you have to deal with the new sentiments against foreigners. Nevertheless, an aviation magazine here described getting an IR in the U.S. in detail, and the pilot still came out ahead financially. He does have to fly a U.S.-registered aircraft, but apparently he specifically registered his own in the U.S., so he's all set to fly IFR in France, bypassing the crippling cost and red tape of the French government for the most part. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Martin Hotze writes: except for all the loops one has to jump through like fingerprinting, visa (!), etc. for a visa you have to show up in person at the embassy (earlier one was able to do that by mail, BTDT), this costs you at least 1 day (including "interviews"). for a student visa you need a M1, but if you go Part 61 the flight school is not able to issue the required papers (and you have to chose your flight school beforehand, changes are close to impossible now, BTDT, too). Then you need the fingerprinting and the flight school has to report you to the government/FAA. Each involved party in this process, including the immigration officer can make your plans go south. Then - not flying related - you have to deal with the new sentiments against foreigners. Nevertheless, an aviation magazine here described getting an IR in the U.S. in detail, and the pilot still came out ahead financially. He does have to fly a U.S.-registered aircraft, but apparently he specifically registered his own in the U.S., so he's all set to fly IFR in France, bypassing the crippling cost and red tape of the French government for the most part. Wrong again Bertie |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
I'm glad I'm on this side of the pond. Me, too. My son finished his for right around $5K. With a price differential that great, any European flight student would be way ahead financially to simply rent a suite here while attending our local flight school. We had a French fellow do that here last spring, well before the run-up of the Euro; it makes even more sense now. It is not just Europe but also Asia and lots of schools are already addressing the off shore training market. For example, there is a helicopter training outfit at KSBD that caters to the Asian market; it is sometimes a challenge to understand what the students in the pattern's position and intentions are. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 29, 12:32*pm, Jay Honeck wrote:
With a price differential that great, any European flight student would be way ahead financially to simply rent a suite here while attending our local flight school. *We had a French fellow do that here last spring, well before the run-up of the Euro; it makes even more sense now. Ha, another shameless plug for your motel. ![]() Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() With a price differential that great, any European flight student would be way ahead financially to simply rent a suite here while attending our local flight school. We had a French fellow do that here last spring, well before the run-up of the Euro; it makes even more sense now. The US is great for time building if you already have a license.. I knew one Dutch national at my local airport who came over for a few months and racked up all the hours he needed to go from a commercial to an ATP and he told me it would have been far too expensive to do so back home. I think the benefits disappear if you come purely for primary PPL training since you would need $1000 for the airfare alone, plus car rentals, apartment rentals etc which would probably add up to more than the cost of a European PPL. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|