A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Saddam Capture - End to resistance?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old December 14th 03, 09:21 PM
Denyav
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Good news for USA is that
capture of Saddam removes a symbolic obstacle for changeover


I think US knew every step of SH since 1959 and would capture or kill him
anytime between 1959 and today .Lets say bluntly,he was an asshole but our
asshole.
Why we need his services again now?,well I think the administration is under
immense pressure to justify the occupation of Iraq (other than seizing arab
oil) and he is the only one to tell the world that he was the one who hired
OBL.
That means OBL will never be captured alive.
This show might work for domestic audiences,but intended audience is not
domestic and they are pretty aware of SH associations since 1959.


  #32  
Old December 14th 03, 09:51 PM
Chad Irby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

Not me, I have 30 years of aerospace systems experiance.


Senility, then.


I am at my peak at 46. Things are going very well indeed.


So you're adding "aerospace systems experience" at age 16, then. Before
the "NSA Secret clearance at age 17" stuff, of course.

Of course, since you've claimed to have worked on Air Force planes from
1974 to 1980, that would mean you enlisted at, what, seventeen? But
that also leaves no room for that "NSA Secret" claim of yours at 17.

You should keep notes, so you don't get caught in these little...
confusions of your.

What is it you do, Irby?


Lots of things. Computers, video, graphics, photography... I'm waiting
to find out if I get to go work in Iraq (either computer installation or
building TV stations). I used to do electronic warfare in the Air
Force, and am an award-winning game author (about a million sold so far).

What do you do, besides claim to be an engineer?

I mean, besides being clueless here in the newsgroups?


Don't worry, nobody could ever take your place for that. Your
position's safe.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.
  #34  
Old December 14th 03, 10:14 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Chad Irby" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

Not me, I have 30 years of aerospace systems experiance.

Senility, then.


I am at my peak at 46. Things are going very well indeed.


So you're adding "aerospace systems experience" at age 16, then. Before
the "NSA Secret clearance at age 17" stuff, of course.


I was in 5 days after I turned 17 and that was in March.

Of course, since you've claimed to have worked on Air Force planes from
1974 to 1980, that would mean you enlisted at, what, seventeen? But
that also leaves no room for that "NSA Secret" claim of yours at 17.


I enlisted at 16, but the papers were not signed until 5 days after my 17th
birthday.

You should keep notes, so you don't get caught in these little...
confusions of your.


I am not the least bit confused.

So basicly Chad, you have too much trouble following a simple thread to be
able to function in any aerospace technical position. Perhaps you would do
better to just work on reading and wait until you get that part before
posting.

What is it you do, Irby?


Lots of things. Computers, video, graphics, photography... I'm waiting
to find out if I get to go work in Iraq (either computer installation or
building TV stations). I used to do electronic warfare in the Air
Force, and am an award-winning game author (about a million sold so far).


That is what I figured, Chad, well then you need to understand that real
airplanes are different from your imaginary crap.

What do you do, besides claim to be an engineer?


I collect fat royalties and shape regulatory direction, for real airplanes.

I mean, besides being clueless here in the newsgroups?


Don't worry, nobody could ever take your place for that. Your
position's safe.


Chad, you are one of the buggest idiots we have ever had on ram. Have you
ever considered that real airplanes are different from your imaginary crap?


  #35  
Old December 14th 03, 10:14 PM
Denyav
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You misspelled "USSR."


Do you think that the persons like Roger Morris and Jim Eichelberger were USSR
officials?
  #38  
Old December 14th 03, 10:39 PM
Chad Irby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

However, Denyav did peg Irby as an asshole.


Actually, Denyav has never said that. Just you, in recent days.

Let's see...

Dozens, if not hundreds of people think Tarver is an idiot/asshole.

Tarver thinks I'm one.

Hmm. Conclusion: I win.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.
  #40  
Old December 14th 03, 11:05 PM
B2431
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: "Emmanuel Gustin"
Date: 12/14/2003 2:45 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

"B2431" wrote in message
...

Based on post WW2 Germany's experience we can expect another year or two

of
armed resistance. The Nazi Werewolves attacked accupying troops as well as
Germans who were "collaborating" for at least two years.


Don't know where you collected that "information". The most
impact the "Werewolves" ever had was *before* the surrender,
and only because they influenced the movement of large numbers
of US troops, which were diverted to mop-up non-existent but
feared pockets of resistance in Southern Germany. As a bluff
they succeeded, as an armed resistance they were a complete
failure.

In Germany, resistance to the Allied occupation was simply not
a concern. There were a few isolated incidents, most significantly
*before* the German surrender (but in occupied territory) and that
was it. The general attitude to the American occupation was one
of resignation and relief -- anything better than the Russians.

--
Emmanuel Gustin
Emmanuel.Gustin -rem@ve- skynet dot be
Flying Guns Page:
http://users.skynet.be/Emmanuel.Gustin/


I used the term Werewolves as a generic term to cover all the groups from those
who simply demonstrated to those who threw bombs. I agree the Werewolf program
was supposed to be a bunch of "guerillas" behind Allied lines killing
collaboraters, committing acts of sabotage and killing Allied troops. However
there were any number of people after the surrender who also called themselves
Werewolves and behaved similarly.

I agree with your assesment of their success or lack thereof.

I only attempted a simplification.
Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Saddam in the bag? Cub Driver Military Aviation 10 December 14th 03 08:56 PM
NAILED HIM! Saddam found in a hole like the animal he is.... Thomas J. Paladino Jr. Military Aviation 0 December 14th 03 01:02 PM
please stop bashing France Grantland Military Aviation 233 October 29th 03 01:23 AM
In Latest Tape, Saddam Says He's Proud of His Sons' Deaths Matt Wiser Military Aviation 0 August 3rd 03 03:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.