A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Looking for B-17 video...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old December 27th 03, 06:19 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
y.com...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
isi.com...
Duster wrote:
Could you point me to the thread? This sounds intersting...

A good starting point:

http://home.att.net/~j.knoyle/the_ta...hronicles.html


Although you would have to be an idiot to buy Knoyle's archive troll, it

is
humorous and an excellent idiot detector.


I can't believe Tarver/Splappy/Splaps Boy stated "Jim Knoyl's Site" is an
"Excellent Idiot Detector".


It is true. Knoyle provides a hillarious collection of newsgroup snippets,
where a wide spectrum of aviation buffs demonstrate their adhearance to
newsgroup fairy tales. At ada, the truth doesn't matter, but that delusion
does not play so well outside the newsgroup.


  #32  
Old December 27th 03, 06:23 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
y.com...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
.. .

"Duster" wrote in message
. ..
Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost better
though..

Duster

Tarver cannot get it through his head that having the air handling

units
operating under the CWT when the A/C is stationary is like putting a
pressure cooker with a small amount of fuel in it, on a stove at low

heat.

Nesbitt can't get it through his head that a 747 is not a bomb and there

is
no design philosophy to make airliners that are bombs at Boeing.

Hopefully your skull is thick enough to deflect the flying "Bits & Pieces"
when an FAE occurs.


You mean aluminium dust?

Sorry, Nesbitt, no aluminium dust bombs, no hydrogen and propane potato gun,
just an empty fuel tank. What you write demonstrates just how deeply Hall's
NTSB implanted their fantasy in your mind.


  #33  
Old December 27th 03, 07:00 PM
Ralph Nesbitt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
y.com...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
isi.com...
Duster wrote:
Could you point me to the thread? This sounds intersting...

A good starting point:

http://home.att.net/~j.knoyle/the_ta...hronicles.html

Although you would have to be an idiot to buy Knoyle's archive troll,

it
is
humorous and an excellent idiot detector.


I can't believe Tarver/Splappy/Splaps Boy stated "Jim Knoyl's Site" is

an
"Excellent Idiot Detector".


It is true. Knoyle provides a hillarious collection of newsgroup

snippets,
where a wide spectrum of aviation buffs demonstrate their adhearance to
newsgroup fairy tales. At ada, the truth doesn't matter, but that

delusion
does not play so well outside the newsgroup.

Is that why you post so many "Outlandish Fallacies" to ADA, AR, & AM.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type


  #34  
Old December 27th 03, 07:01 PM
Ralph Nesbitt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
y.com...
Please note "Splaps Boy" is the one screaming "Bomb" not be.


You write "bomb" WRT the 747 on a regular basis, Ralph. If I were an
archive troll, I'd wager there are over 100 instances where Ralph posted
"bomb" in 747 threads WRT the 747 CWT. (all references to "wager" exclude
the no-pay mazor sock)

Is that per your interpretation, or mine?
Ralph Nesbitt


  #35  
Old December 27th 03, 07:05 PM
Ralph Nesbitt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
y.com...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
.. .

"Duster" wrote in message
. ..
Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost

better
though..

Duster

Tarver cannot get it through his head that having the air handling

units
operating under the CWT when the A/C is stationary is like putting a
pressure cooker with a small amount of fuel in it, on a stove at low

heat.

Nesbitt can't get it through his head that a 747 is not a bomb and

there
is
no design philosophy to make airliners that are bombs at Boeing.

Hopefully your skull is thick enough to deflect the flying "Bits &

Pieces"
when an FAE occurs.


You mean aluminium dust?

Sorry, Nesbitt, no aluminium dust bombs, no hydrogen and propane potato

gun,
just an empty fuel tank. What you write demonstrates just how deeply

Hall's
NTSB implanted their fantasy in your mind.

Splappy you are beginning to get so far out in the "Briar Patch" beyond the
"Facility's Left Field Fence" you can barely be "Heard".
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type


  #36  
Old December 27th 03, 07:11 PM
John Mazor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Scott M. Kozel" wrote in message
...
"John Mazor" wrote:

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote
"Duster" wrote in message

Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost better
though..

Tarver cannot get it through his head that having the air handling

units
operating under the CWT when the A/C is stationary is like putting a
pressure cooker with a small amount of fuel in it, on a stove at low

heat.

That, and Tarver being an engineer, reminds me of the old joke: an

engineer
is someone who thinks that, if your left leg is in a bucket of hot water

and
your right leg is in a bucket of ice, then on average, you're

comfortable.

Keyboard!


Mairzee bo-coopses.


  #37  
Old December 27th 03, 07:16 PM
Scott M. Kozel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote:

"Tarver Engineering" wrote
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
Duster wrote:

Could you point me to the thread? This sounds intersting...

A good starting point:

http://home.att.net/~j.knoyle/the_ta...hronicles.html


Although you would have to be an idiot to buy Knoyle's archive troll, it is
humorous and an excellent idiot detector.


"ROFL/KEYBOARD".


That is an interesting combination... does that involve laughing so hard
that you knock the keyboard onto the floor, and then ruin the keyboard
as you roll over it on the floor while laughing?


I can't believe Tarver/Splappy/Splaps Boy stated "Jim Knoyl's Site" is an
"Excellent Idiot Detector". No doubt IMHO, it has detected an idiot. I hope
Jim see's this.


Keybooard!
  #38  
Old December 27th 03, 07:30 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
y.com...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
y.com...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
.. .

"Duster" wrote in message
. ..
Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost

better
though..

Duster

Tarver cannot get it through his head that having the air handling

units
operating under the CWT when the A/C is stationary is like putting

a
pressure cooker with a small amount of fuel in it, on a stove at

low
heat.

Nesbitt can't get it through his head that a 747 is not a bomb and

there
is
no design philosophy to make airliners that are bombs at Boeing.

Hopefully your skull is thick enough to deflect the flying "Bits &

Pieces"
when an FAE occurs.


You mean aluminium dust?

Sorry, Nesbitt, no aluminium dust bombs, no hydrogen and propane potato

gun,
just an empty fuel tank. What you write demonstrates just how deeply

Hall's
NTSB implanted their fantasy in your mind.

Splappy you are beginning to get so far out in the "Briar Patch" beyond

the
"Facility's Left Field Fence" you can barely be "Heard".


I am completely mainstream. It is your insistance on lying about the
reliability of the 747 that is out in the ozone, Ralph. There is nothing
wrong with the airplane, as it comes from the factory.


  #39  
Old December 27th 03, 07:32 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
y.com...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
y.com...
Please note "Splaps Boy" is the one screaming "Bomb" not be.


You write "bomb" WRT the 747 on a regular basis, Ralph. If I were an
archive troll, I'd wager there are over 100 instances where Ralph posted
"bomb" in 747 threads WRT the 747 CWT. (all references to "wager"

exclude
the no-pay mazor sock)

Is that per your interpretation, or mine?


It is your own posted words, Nesbitt. You are a nut, out trashing the 747,
but somehow hurling insults at me will make you right; only on usenet.


  #40  
Old December 27th 03, 09:08 PM
Jim Knoyle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
y.com...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
y.com...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
.. .

"Duster" wrote in message
. ..
Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost

better
though..

Duster

Tarver cannot get it through his head that having the air

handling
units
operating under the CWT when the A/C is stationary is like

putting
a
pressure cooker with a small amount of fuel in it, on a stove at

low
heat.

Nesbitt can't get it through his head that a 747 is not a bomb and

there
is
no design philosophy to make airliners that are bombs at Boeing.

Hopefully your skull is thick enough to deflect the flying "Bits &

Pieces"
when an FAE occurs.

You mean aluminium dust?

Sorry, Nesbitt, no aluminium dust bombs, no hydrogen and propane

potato
gun,
just an empty fuel tank. What you write demonstrates just how deeply

Hall's
NTSB implanted their fantasy in your mind.

Splappy you are beginning to get so far out in the "Briar Patch" beyond

the
"Facility's Left Field Fence" you can barely be "Heard".


I am completely mainstream. It is your insistance on lying about the
reliability of the 747 that is out in the ozone, Ralph. There is nothing
wrong with the airplane, as it comes from the factory.


Your "burning electricity caused section 40 to fall off" theory
sure finds fault with the electrical fault isolation design and
you accuse Boeing of installing an undocumented section
to boot! Suggest you brush up on chapters 6 and 24.
JK



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
turbo video Peter Holm Aerobatics 13 September 29th 04 11:31 PM
Aviation Video: Another F-16 bites the dust Iwan Bogels Instrument Flight Rules 0 September 21st 04 07:02 AM
In-Flight Video Ron Wanttaja Home Built 11 May 16th 04 06:11 AM
B-36 Video Dave Jones Military Aviation 0 November 15th 03 04:05 PM
"Support Our Troops" Video (Link) dave911 Military Aviation 0 July 29th 03 06:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Đ2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.