![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
"BUFDRVR" wrote in message ... actually the TU-95 is an almost exact copy (in concept) of the late 40s original version of the Boeing B-52(a very swept wing with 4 engine pods each with 2 contra rotating props driven by 2 turbine engines) later in the design program the prop engines were replaced by the new "jet" engines being developed at the time. Perhaps BUFDRVR has enough background to confirm this? The original BUFF was designed to be a prop, but when the USAF demanded an all jet bomber, Boeing designers were forced (over a weekend) to redsign her as an all jet bomber. I don't believe the design was for counter-rotating props though. Additionally, I doubt the Bear was a "BUFF rip-off", they have very little in common design wise. Yes the original design shown to the Air Force by George Schairer (the same Boeing engineer that had found the German swept wing data at the Goering Aeronautical Research Institute in May 1945) had counter rotating props. The recommendation to continue development of the swept wing pure jet bombers along the lines of B-47 and B-55 came from Dr. Waldemar Voight, a German advisor to the USAF. The Air Force dumped on the Boeing proposal on a Thursday, the three man Boeing team (Schairer, Carlsen, Blumenthal) was augmented by Ed Wells from Seattle and two members of the B-55 team already in Dayton on other business. Wells drew the plan, Wells and Schairer made the model and the others did the weight and performance calculations. The Air Force told the Boeing team the following Monday that they had a winner and to forget about the B-55. The original of course had a tandem cockpit that LeMay demanded be changed. Anyway these six guys created one of the most significant if not THE most significant aircraft ever conceived over a working weekend in the Van Cleve Hotel in Dayton Ohio. BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
B2431 wrote: inWW2. Ya know, the country that actually HAD them and managed to sink a few major ships with them. How many "major ships" and how do you define "major ships?" As far as I know no battlewagons, heavy cruisers, light cruisers or aircraft carriers were sunk by ASMs. HMS Spartan (Black Prince class light cruiser) was certainly sunk by an air-launched guided missile (Hs-293) in, IIRC, 1943. The same year the Italian battleship Roma was sunk by a guided bomb (Fritz-X) while on her way to Malta to surrender, and the battleship Warspite was mission-killed, completely immobilised and only saved from sinking by some very good damage-control work. That said, Germany certainly didn't invent guided missile (certainly not the surface-to-surface guided missile) as both Britain and the US trialled such devices around the end of WW1 - there's a nice picture around of a British destroyer in about 1918 with a SSM launcher mounted forward (a catapult for a small radio-controlled bomb-carrying aeroplane). -- Andy Breen ~ Interplanetary Scintillation Research Group http://users.aber.ac.uk/azb/ "Time has stopped, says the Black Lion clock and eternity has begun" (Dylan Thomas) |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
"B2431" wrote in message ... From: Kristan Roberge Date: 2/2/2004 12:17 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: How many "major ships" and how do you define "major ships?" As far as I know no battlewagons, heavy cruisers, light cruisers or aircraft carriers were sunk by ASMs. At least one battleship (Roma) and the cruiser HMS Spartan were sunk another battleship (HMS Warspite) was severely damaged as were two cruisers (HMS Uganda and USS Savanna). Keith |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "B2431" wrote in message ... From: Kristan Roberge Date: 2/2/2004 12:17 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: How many "major ships" and how do you define "major ships?" As far as I know no battlewagons, heavy cruisers, light cruisers or aircraft carriers were sunk by ASMs. At least one battleship (Roma) and the cruiser HMS Spartan were sunk another battleship (HMS Warspite) was severely damaged as were two cruisers (HMS Uganda and USS Savanna). To keep things in perspective regarding Fritz-X, it had a reported 20% success rate ( www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/annex/an41a.htm ). Probably better than the US Azon (VB 1 thru 3), and quite an accomplishment by the standards of the day, but still a mediocre performer overall. Brooks Keith |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message ... At least one battleship (Roma) and the cruiser HMS Spartan were sunk another battleship (HMS Warspite) was severely damaged as were two cruisers (HMS Uganda and USS Savanna). To keep things in perspective regarding Fritz-X, it had a reported 20% success rate ( www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/annex/an41a.htm ). Probably better than the US Azon (VB 1 thru 3), and quite an accomplishment by the standards of the day, but still a mediocre performer overall. Brooks The success rate would probably have been rather higher had a jammer for the radio control system not been rushed into operation. Keith |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
How many "major ships" and how do you define "major ships?" As far as I know no battlewagons, heavy cruisers, light cruisers or aircraft carriers were sunk by ASMs. Roma springs immediately to mind - speared and sunk by Major Bernd. Jope, who Hitler personally decorated for the act. To me, that would be a 'major ship', as it was a front line, modern battleship. I have a small collection of things from Jope, recording this action, including a photo of Roma's death throes. v/r Gordon ====(A+C==== USN SAR Donate your memories - write a note on the back and send your old photos to a reputable museum, don't take them with you when you're gone. |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "Kevin Brooks" wrote in message ... At least one battleship (Roma) and the cruiser HMS Spartan were sunk another battleship (HMS Warspite) was severely damaged as were two cruisers (HMS Uganda and USS Savanna). To keep things in perspective regarding Fritz-X, it had a reported 20% success rate ( www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/annex/an41a.htm ). Probably better than the US Azon (VB 1 thru 3), and quite an accomplishment by the standards of the day, but still a mediocre performer overall. Brooks The success rate would probably have been rather higher had a jammer for the radio control system not been rushed into operation. Which led to the first use of wire guided variants, IIRC--without really changing the success rate. Brooks Keith |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
Actually, both would probably be a better approximation, though I am unaware of any German scientists being used by the US to develop PGM's--do you have any evidence of that? I know of one - but I dont know how he would feel about me identifying him online so I need to leave it at that. Guy worked directly on the land-attack cruise missile, retiring from GD after 30 years on our team, following a stint working with geheime stuff in the old Last Reich. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Russia's state defence orders for 2004 exceed $5 billion | Ron | Military Aviation | 2 | January 18th 04 01:56 AM |