A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Airspeed of military planes



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old January 24th 04, 08:41 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"BUFDRVR" wrote in message
...

I was making the point that the BUFF has an FAA waiver when taking off,

but not
landing. Trying to show how these military waivers are not always as clear

cut
as a blanket coverage.


What is the waiver for and why was it issued?


  #32  
Old January 24th 04, 08:43 PM
S. Sampson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote
"BUFDRVR" wrote

I was making the point that the BUFF has an FAA waiver when taking off,

but not
landing. Trying to show how these military waivers are not always as clear

cut
as a blanket coverage.


What is the waiver for and why was it issued?


Most waivers are for safety. Probably a B-52 with a good load needs all the
speed it can get on climbout.


  #33  
Old January 24th 04, 08:55 PM
Ed Rasimus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 19:46:30 GMT, "Dudley Henriques"
wrote regarding the T-38:

Yup! The standard rule if I remember right was 300 kts and stay the hell
away from icing conditions!!! God, that airplane hated ice!!!!! :-))
Dudley

Things have undoubtedly changed since my last military flight, but the
applicable section of AFR 60-16 which was the governing regulation on
flight operations was that the max airspeed below 10,000 feet MSL was
250 KIAS unless the aircraft operating manual required higher. "We
don' need no steenkin' waivers."

Certainly, compliance with FARs to the maximum extent practicable was
also mandated. But in tactical aircraft, a lot of time was spent
rooting around at speeds higher than 250.

The training command T-38s really wouldn't have a lot of difficulty
with the 300 kts, but the TAC AT-38s regularly did a lot of
low-altitude tactical stuff at higher speed.

As for ice...ABSOLUTELY. I never saw an airplane that was more
sensitive to ice. The slightest bit of rime would threaten to trash
the engines. The tiny J-85 with it's very small compressor blades
wouldn't tolerate much of anything. The F-5 used a different version
of the J-85 with a gap between the front frame and first stage, plus a
heated front frame. Still didn't make it an ice gobbler, but helped a
little bit.

For that matter, you didn't even want the T-38s parked outside in a
heavy rain or hail storm. The honeycomb wing structure would dimple in
a heartbeat. Surprising that the fleet lasted as long as it did
considering the weather in West and South Texas.


Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret)
"When Thunder Rolled"
Smithsonian Institution Press
ISBN #1-58834-103-8
  #34  
Old January 24th 04, 09:00 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"S. Sampson" wrote in message
news:gOAQb.6579$ce2.98@okepread03...

Most waivers are for safety. Probably a B-52 with a good load needs
all the speed it can get on climbout.


But a waiver isn't needed for safety. The regulation permits an aircraft,
civil or military, to be operated at the minimum safe airspeed if the
minimum safe airspeed for any particular operation is greater than the
maximum speed otherwise permitted.


§ 91.117 Aircraft speed.

(a) Unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator, no person may operate
an aircraft below 10,000 feet MSL at an indicated airspeed of more than 250
knots (288 m.p.h.).

(b) Unless otherwise authorized or required by ATC, no person may operate an
aircraft at or below 2,500 feet above the surface within 4 nautical miles of
the primary airport of a Class C or Class D airspace area at an indicated
airspeed of more than 200 knots (230 mph.). This paragraph (b) does not
apply to any operations within a Class B airspace area. Such operations
shall comply with paragraph (a) of this section.

(c) No person may operate an aircraft in the airspace underlying a Class B
airspace area designated for an airport or in a VFR corridor designated
through such a Class B airspace area, at an indicated airspeed of more than
200 knots (230 mph).

(d) If the minimum safe airspeed for any particular operation is greater
than the maximum speed prescribed in this section, the aircraft may be
operated at that minimum speed.


  #35  
Old January 24th 04, 09:18 PM
John R Weiss
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Glenn Westfall" wrote...
I'm an Air Force Air Traffic Controller and am currently working in
Okinawa, Japan. We have F-15's here at Kadena and it is not uncommon
for them to come back well above 400 Kts below 10,000.


How far out over the water does the 250-below-10 limit extend in Japan?

  #36  
Old January 24th 04, 09:18 PM
John R Weiss
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote...

The airspeed limitation he's referring to is found in a Federal Aviation
Regulation, which is applicable only within the US.


However, similar rules are common in other countries as well.

  #37  
Old January 24th 04, 09:22 PM
Frijoles
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sorry...actually its "Susan's husband." I was around r.a.m. occasionally
'til lightning strike on the house last September trashed the old desktop.
We just replaced it within the last month and I forgot to update the
newsgroup i.d. I'm an active duty Marine aviator.

"S. Sampson" wrote in message
news:MIAQb.6578$ce2.1440@okepread03...
"Tony Volk" wrote

Hi Susan. I don't know if I've just missed your previous posts or

not,
but I'm not familiar with your military career, and it'd be interesting

to
hear from another military pilot in these parts. So what did you fly?

For
how long? Cheers,


I think she meant she was a civilian interacting with the federal boys.




  #38  
Old January 24th 04, 09:32 PM
Darrell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If the "Dash One" manual for the military airplane specifies a speed higher
than 250 below 10,000' it's OK to fly that fast. In the B-58 Hustler, after
takeoff we came out of afterburners at 350 KIAS and climbed at 425 KIAS
until reaching Mach .90 for climb speed. That's why other aircraft try to
stay clear of military climb corridors. We flew low level routes at 435
KIAS except for the high speed portion where we flew at 600 KIAS. (and
that's back in the 1960s)

--

B-58 Hustler History: http://members.cox.net/dschmidt1/
-

"Tetsuji Rai" wrote in message
s.com...
Airspeed limitation below 10000ft is usually 250kts unless you have been
authorized by the Administrator. However I guess it's a bit slow for
military fighters. So I am curious how fast military fighters fly in the
real world. I guess it's very dangerous military aircraft fly much fast
among civilian planes.




  #39  
Old January 24th 04, 09:35 PM
BUFDRVR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What is the waiver for and why was it issued?

Most waivers are for safety. Probably a B-52 with a good load needs all the
speed it can get on climbout.


Exactly. A BUFF at 488,000 pounds GW, below 250 KIAS would be a handful.


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"
  #40  
Old January 24th 04, 09:36 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"BUFDRVR" wrote in message
...

I believe *all* Military training Routes (often seen abreviated as
MTR) are waived for operations exceeding 250 KIAS.


MTRs are established for the sole purpose of military training at airspeeds
greater than 250 KIAS.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FA: Flying Aviation Videos - Concorde - Just Planes - Military - B-52, F/A-18, Etc Robert Aviation Marketplace 0 August 29th 04 08:27 PM
Updated List of Military Information-Exchange Forums Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 December 29th 03 02:20 AM
List of News, Discussion and Info Exchange forums Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 November 14th 03 05:01 AM
08 Nov 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 November 9th 03 01:51 AM
RUSSIAN WAR PLANES IN ASIA James Military Aviation 2 October 1st 03 11:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.