Venus Airships / by Brad Guth

?

I'm still trying to figure out what this topic has to do with
rec.aviation.piloting.
--


Or reality for that matter...

In article , Dan
wrote:

BradGuth wrote:
How the heck did my good name get sucked down into the newsgroup pit
of sci.geo.geology?

What good name?

He's got another name he don't use?

"Dan" wrote in message
...
BradGuth wrote:
How the heck did my good name get sucked down into the newsgroup pit
of sci.geo.geology?


What good name?

If he has a good name, why doesn't he use it instead of "Brad Guth"?


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

On May 28, 6:31 am, Dan wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
How the heck did my good name get sucked down into the newsgroup pit
of sci.geo.geology?

What good name?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Just because I haven't lied to myself or others about there being WMD,
nor having killed off my fair share of mostly innocent Muslims. isn't
enough just cause for speaking in a derogatory or mean spirited way
about my good name.

What do you honestly think about a federally mandated price set of $10/
gallon on civilian road and aviation fuel, so that myself and and most
all others (including yourself) I can directly and indirectly help
finance WWIII?

Of course most of everything else would likely inflate by at least
100%, but then it too is for the good cause.

Seemingly, that is what you and those of your Zionist DARPA guys and
gals of the dark side want, isn't it?
.. - Brad Guth

BradGuth wrote:
On May 28, 6:31 am, Dan wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
How the heck did my good name get sucked down into the newsgroup pit
of sci.geo.geology?
What good name?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Just because I haven't lied to myself or others about there being WMD,
nor having killed off my fair share of mostly innocent Muslims. isn't
enough just cause for speaking in a derogatory or mean spirited way
about my good name.

What do you honestly think about a federally mandated price set of $10/
gallon on civilian road and aviation fuel, so that myself and and most
all others (including yourself) I can directly and indirectly help
finance WWIII?

Of course most of everything else would likely inflate by at least
100%, but then it too is for the good cause.

Seemingly, that is what you and those of your Zionist DARPA guys and
gals of the dark side want, isn't it?
. - Brad Guth


I suppose that makes sense to you. Don't let reality get in the way
of your delusions.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

On May 28, 9:42 pm, Dan wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
On May 28, 6:31 am, Dan wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
How the heck did my good name get sucked down into the newsgroup pit
of sci.geo.geology?
What good name?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Just because I haven't lied to myself or others about there being WMD,
nor having killed off my fair share of mostly innocent Muslims. isn't
enough just cause for speaking in a derogatory or mean spirited way
about my good name.

What do you honestly think about a federally mandated price set of $10/
gallon on civilian road and aviation fuel, so that myself and and most
all others (including yourself) I can directly and indirectly help
finance WWIII?

Of course most of everything else would likely inflate by at least
100%, but then it too is for the good cause.

Seemingly, that is what you and those of your Zionist DARPA guys and
gals of the dark side want, isn't it?
. - Brad Guth

I suppose that makes sense to you. Don't let reality get in the way
of your delusions.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

And that has what to do with the R&D of creating those composite rigid
airships for Venus?

How about the required technical expertise of flying such an airship
(robotic or manned) within that thick soup of the Venusian lower
atmosphere?

Obviously you're in favor of job security via war (hot or cold). In
that case we could go to war against whomever is currently situated on
or in any way utilizing Venus, by simply claiming they have WMD and
every intentions of utilizing such. After all, they could be
outsiders and Muslims to boot.
.. - Brad Guth

On 2008-05-29, BradGuth wrote:
How about the required technical expertise of flying such an airship
(robotic or manned) within that thick soup of the Venusian lower
atmosphere?

How does this relate to rec.aviation.piloting? Nobody here knows anything
about the subject, largely because *nobody* knows anything about the
subject.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (ordered 17 March, delivery 10 June)

Jay Maynard wrote in
:

On 2008-05-29, BradGuth wrote:
How about the required technical expertise of flying such an airship
(robotic or manned) within that thick soup of the Venusian lower
atmosphere?

How does this relate to rec.aviation.piloting? Nobody here knows
anything
about the subject, largely because *nobody* knows anything about the
subject.

Maybe you can make him a costume for his explorations...



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3609OtM138c



Bertie

In article ,
Jay Maynard wrote:
On 2008-05-29, BradGuth wrote:
How about the required technical expertise of flying such an airship
(robotic or manned) within that thick soup of the Venusian lower
atmosphere?

How does this relate to rec.aviation.piloting? Nobody here knows anything
about the subject, largely because *nobody* knows anything about the
subject.

Though it pains me to even reply to a reply to the manifestly
delusional Guthball, balloons - though not airships - /have/
been flown in Venus atmosphe at least two of the Soviet
missions to Venus in the 80s launched aerostats, and they yielded
some very interesting (and, in some cases, still not fully
explained) measurements of atmospheric composition[1]. They
were flying in the upper cloud layers, mind. The Venera landers
established pretty well why you'd not try to fly balloons
near the surface. Too dam' hot, and boiling H2SO4 rain would
hurt, too.

[1] And dynamics. Because it rotates so slowly and because
of the angle of its rotation axis, Venus has /very/ odd
weather systems..

--
Andy Breen ~ Speaking for myself, not the University of Wales
"your suggestion rates at four monkeys for six weeks"
(Peter D. Rieden)

BradGuth wrote:
On May 28, 9:42 pm, Dan wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
On May 28, 6:31 am, Dan wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
How the heck did my good name get sucked down into the newsgroup pit
of sci.geo.geology?
What good name?
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Just because I haven't lied to myself or others about there being WMD,
nor having killed off my fair share of mostly innocent Muslims. isn't
enough just cause for speaking in a derogatory or mean spirited way
about my good name.
What do you honestly think about a federally mandated price set of $10/
gallon on civilian road and aviation fuel, so that myself and and most
all others (including yourself) I can directly and indirectly help
finance WWIII?
Of course most of everything else would likely inflate by at least
100%, but then it too is for the good cause.
Seemingly, that is what you and those of your Zionist DARPA guys and
gals of the dark side want, isn't it?
. - Brad Guth
I suppose that makes sense to you. Don't let reality get in the way
of your delusions.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

And that has what to do with the R&D of creating those composite rigid
airships for Venus?

How about the required technical expertise of flying such an airship
(robotic or manned) within that thick soup of the Venusian lower
atmosphere?

Obviously you're in favor of job security via war (hot or cold). In
that case we could go to war against whomever is currently situated on
or in any way utilizing Venus, by simply claiming they have WMD and
every intentions of utilizing such. After all, they could be
outsiders and Muslims to boot.
. - Brad Guth


Anyway, guth, back to your claim of having a "good name." In every
group you have polluted with your presence your name is equivalent to
the terms racist, paranoid, deluded, crude, dense and a few more. You'd
be hard pressed to find anyone who respects you.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired