X-43A successful flight

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or ADMITS a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll, until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.

From: "Tarver Engineering"

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or ADMITS a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll, until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.


Tarver, someday you will have to explain to us what "Knoyle's archive troll"
means. Everything I ever cited as coming from you came from a Google search,
not Knoyle's or any of the other sites dedicated to you.

There are similar sites dedicated to you in several forums from hot air
balooning to cars to homebuilt aircraft to this one. You have made such a fool
of yourself in all those forums that people collect the "tarverisms" into
sites. They are not all made by Knoyle or any other individual.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never
wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions
admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or ADMITS
a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll,
until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.


Tarver, someday you will have to explain to us what "Knoyle's archive
troll"
means. Everything I ever cited as coming from you came from a Google
search,
not Knoyle's or any of the other sites dedicated to you.

Right.

There are similar sites dedicated to you in several forums from hot air
balooning to cars to homebuilt aircraft to this one. You have made such a
fool
of yourself in all those forums that people collect the "tarverisms" into
sites. They are not all made by Knoyle or any other individual.

I made up the term Tarverism.

Be a man Dan and post up that apology.

"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
isi.com...
Limey Dave wrote:

"JL Grasso" wrote in message
...

On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 08:03:38 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"

wrote:


"Michael Zaharis" wrote in message
...


Tarver Engineering wrote:

It is a new B-52, so you didn't see what you thought.

Wrong. It was one of the older B-52s. Note the tall tale, indicating
that it is not the new H- model that NASA recently converted.

http://www.cnn.com/interactive/space...al.02.nasa.jpg

You are correct. My friends at Dryden had assured me that the H would
be
flying the payload and I am wrong.

As per . . .



Extremely UNusual on the other hand........for him to acknowledge it.

Yeah, but notice he blamed it on someone else and tried to impress with
his alleged inside contacts. Par for the course for Splappy.


Yeah, the janitor at Dryden is often as wrong as Splappy himself. Of course,
he's smart enough not to post it all over usenet.

Limey.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
isi.com...
Limey Dave wrote:

"JL Grasso" wrote in message
...

On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 08:03:38 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"

wrote:


"Michael Zaharis" wrote in message
...


Tarver Engineering wrote:

It is a new B-52, so you didn't see what you thought.

Wrong. It was one of the older B-52s. Note the tall tale,
indicating
that it is not the new H- model that NASA recently converted.


http://www.cnn.com/interactive/space...al.02.nasa.jpg

You are correct. My friends at Dryden had assured me that the H
would
be
flying the payload and I am wrong.

As per . . .

Extremely UNusual on the other hand........for him to acknowledge it.

Yeah, but notice he blamed it on someone else and tried to impress with
his alleged inside contacts. Par for the course for Splappy.

I have been around enough B-52s to recognize the tall tail, so I can't
blame
my mistake on someone else.


Wow! Splappy admits being mortal....a big day in history!

Limey.

From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 3/31/2004 8:19 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never
wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions
admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or ADMITS
a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll,
until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.


Tarver, someday you will have to explain to us what "Knoyle's archive
troll"
means. Everything I ever cited as coming from you came from a Google
search,
not Knoyle's or any of the other sites dedicated to you.

Right.

There are similar sites dedicated to you in several forums from hot air
balooning to cars to homebuilt aircraft to this one. You have made such a
fool
of yourself in all those forums that people collect the "tarverisms" into
sites. They are not all made by Knoyle or any other individual.

I made up the term Tarverism.

Be a man Dan and post up that apology.

Apologize for what? Not stooping to your level by being vulgar and making
personal attacks? For not using Knoyle's archives to remind you of some of the
incredibly strange assertions you have made? For disagreeing with you on
systems I have worked and you haven't? For not getting angry when you
repeatedly claimed I had been thrown out of the Air Force with a dishonourable?
For proving you wrong with facts from reliable sources? For asking you to cite
independant and reliable sources? For not believing you are correct when
reliable and independant expert sources have proved you wrong?

Just what am I supposed to apologize for?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 3/31/2004 8:19 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never
wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions
admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or
ADMITS
a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll,
until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.


Tarver, someday you will have to explain to us what "Knoyle's archive
troll"
means. Everything I ever cited as coming from you came from a Google
search,
not Knoyle's or any of the other sites dedicated to you.

Right.

There are similar sites dedicated to you in several forums from hot air
balooning to cars to homebuilt aircraft to this one. You have made such
a
fool
of yourself in all those forums that people collect the "tarverisms"
into
sites. They are not all made by Knoyle or any other individual.

I made up the term Tarverism.

Be a man Dan and post up that apology.

Apologize for what?

You owe me an apology for you being a clueless ass you several years WRT
pitot static systems, Dan.

From: "Tarver Engineering"


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 3/31/2004 8:19 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never
wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions
admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or
ADMITS
a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll,
until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.


Tarver, someday you will have to explain to us what "Knoyle's archive
troll"
means. Everything I ever cited as coming from you came from a Google
search,
not Knoyle's or any of the other sites dedicated to you.

Right.

There are similar sites dedicated to you in several forums from hot air
balooning to cars to homebuilt aircraft to this one. You have made such
a
fool
of yourself in all those forums that people collect the "tarverisms"
into
sites. They are not all made by Knoyle or any other individual.

I made up the term Tarverism.

Be a man Dan and post up that apology.

Apologize for what?

You owe me an apology for you being a clueless ass you several years WRT
pitot static systems, Dan.

Unlike you I have 20 years experience in pitot-static systems. Do a google
search on your converstations with several of us and you will see I have
nothing to apologize for.

I notice you deleted:

begin quote

Apologize for what? Not stooping to your level by being vulgar and making
personal attacks? For not using Knoyle's archives to remind you of some of the
incredibly strange assertions you have made? For disagreeing with you on
systems I have worked and you haven't? For not getting angry when you
repeatedly claimed I had been thrown out of the Air Force with a dishonourable?
For proving you wrong with facts from reliable sources? For asking you to cite
independant and reliable sources? For not believing you are correct when
reliable and independant expert sources have proved you wrong?

Just what am I supposed to apologize for?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

end quote


Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 3/31/2004 8:19 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is
never
wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions
admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or
ADMITS
a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive
troll,
until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.


Tarver, someday you will have to explain to us what "Knoyle's
archive
troll"
means. Everything I ever cited as coming from you came from a Google
search,
not Knoyle's or any of the other sites dedicated to you.

Right.

There are similar sites dedicated to you in several forums from hot
air
balooning to cars to homebuilt aircraft to this one. You have made
such
a
fool
of yourself in all those forums that people collect the "tarverisms"
into
sites. They are not all made by Knoyle or any other individual.

I made up the term Tarverism.

Be a man Dan and post up that apology.

Apologize for what?

You owe me an apology for you being a clueless ass you several years WRT
pitot static systems, Dan.

Unlike you I have 20 years experience in pitot-static systems. Do a google
search on your converstations with several of us and you will see I have
nothing to apologize for.

I was here, you have an entire plate of crow to eat, Dan.

From: "Tarver Engineering"


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 3/31/2004 8:19 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is
never
wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions
admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or
ADMITS
a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive
troll,
until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.


Tarver, someday you will have to explain to us what "Knoyle's
archive
troll"
means. Everything I ever cited as coming from you came from a Google
search,
not Knoyle's or any of the other sites dedicated to you.

Right.

There are similar sites dedicated to you in several forums from hot
air
balooning to cars to homebuilt aircraft to this one. You have made
such
a
fool
of yourself in all those forums that people collect the "tarverisms"
into
sites. They are not all made by Knoyle or any other individual.

I made up the term Tarverism.

Be a man Dan and post up that apology.

Apologize for what?

You owe me an apology for you being a clueless ass you several years WRT
pitot static systems, Dan.

Unlike you I have 20 years experience in pitot-static systems. Do a google
search on your converstations with several of us and you will see I have
nothing to apologize for.

I was here, you have an entire plate of crow to eat, Dan.

Once again you are dismissed to the land of irrelevant fibbers and fools like
petukhov, maron and teuton. Have a fine day.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired