If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#441
|
|||
|
|||
Should I be scared -- C172 over Gross
Mxsmanic wrote:
When have I been mean and negative? You have been hostile and negative nearly all the time during your participation here, and you continue to be this way. That you are insufficiently capable of introspection to understand this is well understood. -- dgs |
#442
|
|||
|
|||
Should I be scared -- C172 over Gross
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Benjamin Dover writes: Here's one he posted today in VATSIM in response to someone who pointed out that in trains is a "dead man's" button which, if controls are not touched every few minutes, set off an alarm. Said Anthony, "Aircraft have this, too, at least in real life, although it doesn't seem to be simulated, at least not by PMDG." He really doesn't know **** from shinola. The 747-400 has three levels of alarm. All appear as PILOT RESPONSE on the EICAS, the first being an advisory without an audible alarm, the second a caution with a beeper, and the third a warning with a siren. The 777 (at least, not sure about others) also has this alarm, and I presume it works in much the same way. I'm sure it's configurable by operators. This from someone who had to ask where the handle for the ejector seat on his Baron was located. And from someone who tells us about flying his Baron from Phoenix to Las Vegas "In the real world, when you have VFR traffic in your airspace that you're not talking to, does the traffic usually follow established airways, or fly mostly direct to obvious fixes (like VORs or major waypoints), or does VFR traffic tend to be all over the place?" How about your boasts of all your flying experience and how you prefer IFR, Anthony? If you had any experience whatsoever, why did you need to ask in VATSIM today (4/25/2008) "When flying IFR under ATC, am I required to use only altimeter settings provided by ATC, or can I listen to the ATIS of a nearby airport and set my altimeter that way?" Any IFR rated pilot knows the answer and why. Hell, private pilots know the answer and why while still student pilots. You don't. You're not a pilot. YOU DON'T KNOW **** FROM SHINOLA. YOU ARE AN IMPOSTER. A POSER. A PHONY! |
#443
|
|||
|
|||
Should I be scared -- C172 over Gross
Mxsmanic wrote:
I'm always positive and friendly. No, you're not. You are neither positive nor friendly. You are typically negative and hostile. It doesn't work. Yes, your approach of being negative and hostile doesn't work. It never has, and it never will. -- dgs |
#444
|
|||
|
|||
Should I be scared -- C172 over Gross
dgs writes:
You have been hostile and negative nearly all the time during your participation here, and you continue to be this way. That you are insufficiently capable of introspection to understand this is well understood. Weren't you complaining about me not discussing aviation just a post or two ago? |
#445
|
|||
|
|||
Should I be scared -- C172 over Gross
Mxsmanic wrote:
dgs writes: So... just what the *HELL* does this have to do with aviation, whiny-boi? Nothing. So you admit that this has nothing to do with aviation, but you continue to post anyway. This makes you a liar. Why do you lie so much? But people who dislike me regularly divert any discussion in which I participate to a discussion of me personally. So? And this forces you to post more of your babbling non-aviation- related drivel then? Do these "people who dislike you" somehow reach out and force you to post your off-topic crap? If you don't care about such people, why do you even bother to respond? And, again: Why do you continue to lie so much? Perhaps they secretly admire me, if they find me so much more interesting than the topic at hand. What does this have to do with aviation? Why do you lie so much? A personal attack names its target. Nobody would be insulted by what I say unless he voluntarily considers himself a clueless kiddie, which is his choice (and revealing of his own self-evaluation) and not mine. What does this steaming pile of solipsistic self-delusional crap have to do with aviation? Why do you lie so much? -- dgs |
#446
|
|||
|
|||
Should I be scared -- C172 over Gross
Benjamin Dover writes:
This from someone who had to ask where the handle for the ejector seat on his Baron was located. I don't recall asking such a question. Any IFR rated pilot knows the answer and why. There are a lot of things that IFR-rated pilots are supposed to know that they don't. |
#447
|
|||
|
|||
Should I be scared -- C172 over Gross
On Apr 26, 9:40*am, Benjamin Dover wrote:
terry wrote : On Apr 26, 1:18*am, gatt wrote: Mxsmanic wrote: gatt writes: Who else here "discusses aviation" with you? There are several people here who seem level-headed, but I won't name th em, lest the treehouse club add them to the target list. Surely somebody will step forward and defend you. Why? *I can defend myself very well indeed. You completely missed yet another point. I did in fact defend him for some time, *but later felt the need to apologise to the group, for my behaviour in doing that. As a relatively inexperienced pilot I guess I didnt fully appreciate the annoyance that airline pilots and instructors would feel being told they were wrong (without substantiating evidence) by someone who had never flown in his life. *As a PhD in physical chemisty ,my attitude changed somewhat when he tried to tell me how the Universal Gas Law didnt apply in the atmophere, despite several polite attempts on my part to explain otherwise. *There is nothing wrong with being wrong, as long as you learn from the experience. It is the complete and utter inability to accept and acknowledge when he is wrong that is so irritating. *If he wasnt such an obnoxious character and wasnt 16000 km away I would otherwise have loved to take him up ( gratis), although I suspect there is something else lacking that would have prevented him from accepting. Don't feel bad. *You're not the first one to try and work with the MXSmoron. *Many of the posters who now bash him also tried. I have a suggestion, why dont we have a collection and *send Anthony off on a trial instructional flight on the proviso that the instructor publishes an account of his peformance on this group? *I'll contribute $20 What about it Anthony , are you up for it? This offer has been made before and more than once. *Anthony is too CS to to go up in a small airplane. *But, then again, he is to CS to experience real life. For a laugh, look at Anthony's user profile in Wikipedia:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Agateller For more laughs, look go to his profile in VATSIM and then click on "Find all posts by Anthony Atkielski 985811". *There are some real pilots and controllers there, but it is amazing how idiots like Anthony can't understand what the people who do this stuff in real life are trying to explain to him. *Like Anthony's claim that, similar to trains, there is a "dead mans" switch in airplane cockpits, but they are not simulated. Anthony's VATSIM profile can be found at:http://forums.vatsim.net/profile.php...ofile&u=985811 Just my own observation, have had read access to both this newsgroup AND the old COMPUSERV AVSIG news group for well over two decades now. *A lot of people with some great experiences that they were willing to share have left because of the harrassment they got from the Anthony's who post here. * Even Splaps Tarver and the Rockaway Loon have shown far more knowledge and understanding about aviation than Anthony, despite his claims to intelligence, ever will. *Even the fish who's name we no longer mention would rank above Anthony in understanding aviation, although not by much. * It is very fortunate that we have some stalwarts like Dudly and the Bunyip who ignore Anthony's ravings and continue to generously give this newsgroup the benefit of their hard earned experience and knowledge.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - For someone with such supposedly high levels of IT skills, which demand high paid salaries, why does he cry poor? |
#449
|
|||
|
|||
Should I be scared -- C172 over Gross
On Apr 26, 12:05 pm, terry wrote:
- Show quoted text - For someone with such supposedly high levels of IT skills, which demand high paid salaries, why does he cry poor? Incompetence has its own rewards...... ? |
#450
|
|||
|
|||
Should I be scared -- C172 over Gross
Mxsmanic wrote:
Dudley Henriques writes: I can prove that to you easily. Try posting to me in a positive and friendly manner and I'll be happy to respond in kind. I'm always positive and friendly. It doesn't work. Well I'll make a deal with you Anthony, as I notice that you are indeed attracting a WHOLE lot of flack on the forum. Tell you what Anthony. I'll promise you right here and now, with the entire forum watching, that if you will post sincere aviation related dialog to me personally, from this post onward I will answer you with respect and matching sincerity. Perhaps if you and I begin such a dialog, maybe we can turn this thing around for you. I don't know how to be more fair than this. I'd like nothing better than to see your situation get better around here. I'm more than willing to meet you half way on this. Let's you and I start something positive. What have you got to lose? Give it a try. -- Dudley Henriques |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My wife getting scared | Paul Tomblin | Piloting | 271 | October 11th 07 08:19 PM |
Scared of mid-airs | Frode Berg | Piloting | 355 | August 20th 06 05:27 PM |
UBL wants a truce - he's scared of the CIA UAV | John Doe | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | January 19th 06 08:58 PM |
Max gross weight | Chris | Piloting | 21 | October 5th 04 08:22 PM |
Scared and trigger-happy | John Galt | Military Aviation | 5 | January 31st 04 12:11 AM |