![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe Johnson" wrote in message ... Should I report this to the FAA? If you did, what action would you expect the FAA to take? |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message nk.net... Well, which is it? Would you have collided without the 360 as it was or would you have collided only if the Citation had held short a few seconds longer and pulled out as you were crossing the threshold? Definite collision if I had continued to land as it was. I was trying to make the point that I started to make contigency plans (Extend downwind? Plan for a 360 or S turns? Plan to go around?) from the moment I saw the Citation on the taxiway and heard nothing on CTAF. I decided to turn base because the Citation stopped at the hold short line and continued to call my position (scratch the extend downwind plan). Not sure what your point is. Is it that there is never any chance of a collision if at least one party is watching and knows what's going on? |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe Johnson wrote:
As I was on 1/4 to 1/2 mile final, the Citation suddenly took the runway and started the takeoff roll; I remember my first landing at a controlled airport with heavy iron. (Got my primary training at a small grass strip.) I was told by the tower to continue my approach. The runway was empty. But the very moment I turned base to final, which is about 1/2 mile from the threshold at that airport (Zürich), I saw to my surprize a 737 rolling onto the runway and lining up, obviously cleared by the tower to do so. When I was about 1/4 mile out, I got uneasy and called the tower, asking what to do. "Continue approach, the airliner will depart." And so it did. Plenty of room, a non event. Stefan |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mindenpilot wrote:
......... I'd like to think that if I ever made a mistake (wrong frequency, etc), someone would cut me some slack. Exactly. Once I punched up the wrong frequency at my own field... I was looking all around as I taxied and made my calls. I saw and heard no one else in the pattern or on the field as I took the runway and departed. It wasn't until I was airborne and still hearing silence that I took a close look at the radio and noticed it was on the wrong frequency! DOH! If there is no activity on the field nowadays I call up UNICOM for a radio check. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message k.net... "Cub Driver" wrote in message ... Seems to me the Citation pilot fell short of his obligation. Perhaps as the more experienced pilot he figured he knew he had time to take off without jeopardizing the other plane. Yup, and he may have figured correctly. Interesting how you snipped the rest of Dan's post: Of course he should have called. It's never a good idea to spook somebody controlling a heavy object at high speed. Agree with you, Dan. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jay - Were other people on Unicom/CTAF? Was the cessna the exception? Maybe your radio was tuned wrong? I doubt you want to play Mr. FAA but if you have others with you on this, you might have a stronger case. Is there a FAR that states Part 135 have standardized CTAF or could they claim "oh, it's an uncontrolled field. I can do anything including shutting off the radios in my $18 million spam-can smashing jet." Generally, on approaches into uncontrolled airports, I'll make regular radio calls. At times it gets busy as hell and I might skip one or even two. Pre-departure the workload is a LOT less so not making radio calls is kind of silly. I still remember on my PPL checkride on 12/17/03, everyone and their mother was out flying. I had a C182 position and hold when I was on a 2 mile final for the simulated engine out. I was just about to go around and cancel/postpone that section of it when the guy started rolling. Uncontrolled airports really scare me. I'd rather have "the voice of god" commanding aircraft around. Gerald |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Denny wrote:
Remember the old chinese adage, "The nail that sticks up, gets hammered down." Hmmm.... Given China's history of controlling its people, might there be a better adage to use? -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Tomblin" wrote in message ... I was in the middle of announcing my turn to final when a twin took the runway, so I ammended my call to say I was going to do a right 270 for spacing. The pilot in the twin said "no, continue on final, I'll be out of here in no time", so I did, and he was right. Did the pilot take the runway unannounced? |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"G. Sylvester" wrote:
Uncontrolled airports really scare me. I'd rather have "the voice of god" commanding aircraft around. Too bad that doesn't work. The recent mid-airs in the US occurred at towered airports. You really should be scared of class D airports. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter R." wrote:
Too bad that doesn't work. This should read: "Too bad that doesn't *always* work." It obviously works most of the time. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Please help -- It's down to the wire | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 12 | July 14th 04 06:05 PM |
Please help -- It's down to the wire | Jay Honeck | Owning | 24 | July 14th 04 06:05 PM |
Rules on what can be in a hangar | Brett Justus | Owning | 13 | February 27th 04 05:35 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |