Awesome moonscape

gatt wrote:

"Yids?" Is referring to somebody from New Zealand as a "yid" and then
making suggestions about incest and DNA code somehow supposed to fortify
your scientific argument, or are you just lashing out 'cause you've got
nothing left?

Which is it?


Oh, if he was talking about NZers then I retract my earlier comment.

Apparently the new and improved moon science via China and Japan do
not hardly exist as far as Usenet and especially the likes of NASA's
uplink.space.com firewall. Besides JAXA as having been recently
excluding those natural color images of our moon, is there any good
technical reason(s) as to why the JAXA/SELENE(KAGUYA) science via
their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and "Gamma Ray Spectrometer(GRS)" are
also being kept secret?

FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye. A
good orange/amber worth of an optical spectrum filter (as added onto
their otherwise bandpass coated lens) would have permitted a somewhat
more natural color looking moon, as though viewed from Earth by using
a quality telescope that's getting extensively filtered by our
polluted atmosphere and secondly by the rather extensive 8r(8X radius)
worth of the sodium(Na) saturated atmosphere that's associated with
our moon, of which our NASA/Apollo wizards that had to have been so
blinded by Venus, as for their having somehow missed entirely the
lunar element of sodium (Na11 solid @.97 g/cm3) that's continually
getting vaporised and leaving the moon's extremely hot surface as the
solar wind manages to create that 900,000 ~ 1,000,000 km comet like
tail of lunar Na.

However, at best it looks as though we're still being lied to again
and again by NASA's Usenet swarm of brown-nosed rusemasters in charge
of snookering humanity for all it's worth. In other words, it seems
their MI5/CIA boss or MIB agents in charge of their PR damage control
that's likely standing directly behind each operator of all those
spendy supercomputer work stations (with a loaded gun pointed at each
of their empty borg like heads) is not about to allow any public
Usenet chat about our physically dark and unusually blue moon of such
sodium, or much less share anything about how their NASA and of those
rad-hard Apollo wizards, along with all that Semitic Third Reich kind
of right stuff, as having so nicely managed via unfiltered optics to
always avoid those BLUE saturated hues as well as their having always
managed to hide Venus at the same time.

JAXA / SELENE (KAGUYA)
http://www.selene.jaxa.jp/en/communi...#NEW_20071214A

Notice their intentional color removal of the moon itself, and of
those very same images as otherwise depicting mother Earth in full
color. (it's quite easy to prove this being the case)

Down on that same page are a few of those other original full color
images of mostly the moon itself along with parts of the their
spacecraft as depicted within such a rather nifty bluish saturation
hue or tint. Remember that Selene's quality optics had been custom
bandpass coated in order to cut out the vast bulk of UV and IR to
start with, even to the point of attenuating some of the violet
spectrum.

The rather impressive blue saturated hue or color skewed amount of
bluish tint is clearly that offering an expected color shift or sort
of UV black-light forced blue saturated image result, as unavoidably
of their CCD obtained result from all the raw secondary/recoil worth
of what most such reactive items as getting UV saturated should look
like, as even to such a bandpass filtered CCD w/o having the necessary
deep color correction filter, as otherwise getting especially blue
saturated as to that of what any unfiltered Kodak film recorded image
(via NASA/Apollo) should have depicted.

Unfortunately, the JAXA "KAGUYA Image Gallery" that's apparently
forever stuck with using the "Adobe(R) Flash Player(R)" is what
seriously sucks, as sharing far less than full resolution and
otherwise running extremely poorly on most computers w/o a super fast
internet connection and having lots of extra PC memory to spare.

The science from their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and "Gamma Ray
Spectrometer(GRS)" as likely being equally saturated at much greater
levels than expected, as such may also have to become excluded from
the general public, because of such data being so unexpectedly intense
or off-scale, in that an entirely new effort at obtaining such
intended science about the complex surface of our physically dark moon
may have to wait for the next available mission. Perhaps the lunar
exploration efforts by India will have adapted the necessary narrow
bandpass of sufficient optical spectrum filtering with sufficient
color correction, as well as for their science instruments having
either greater XRS/GRS scope or much tighter resolution in order to
properly deal with the unusual gamma and X-ray intensity of what that
naked and very anticathode moon actually represents.

KAGUYA/(SELENE) HDTV/CCD imaging getting its first full solar dosage
or skewed saturation of those pesky raw secondary photons, as for
looking rather deep blue.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071021_kaguya_e.pdf
http://www.selene.jaxa.jp/index_e.htm
http://www.kaguya.jaxa.jp/en/
Notice as to all of the unavoidable UV secondary/recoil worth of
looking bluish and/or extra purple/violet saturation that KAGUYA/
(SELENE) HDTV is having to deal with, even though their having
incorporated a sufficient UV spectrum cut-off filter and currently
using not more than a few percent worth of their HDTV dynamic
range(DR), yet having no problems with recording the physically dark
moon along with Earth that's not even worth half the albedo of Venus
which has greater than 2.6 kw/m2 of raw solar influx to work with.
Far better images are soon enough going to be accomplished, especially
with those other onboard CCD instruments that'll far exceed what most
of our previous science about our extremely unusual moon had to say.
- Brad Guth -


On Dec 14, 9:56 am, "ManhattanMan" wrote:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/

Todays "Astronomy Picture Of The Day" - it changes daily so this moonscape
is only on today Friday 12/14.

Man, what a panorama!

And it's not OT, as Frank Sinatra crooned, "Fly me to the moon"....

Cheers'n beers.. [_])
Don

BradGuth wrote:


FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye.

Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can be pink.

On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder wrote:
BradGuth wrote:

FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye.

Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can be pink.

Are you saying that China and Japan had each put blue bandpass filters
on their color cameras?
- Brad Guth -

On Dec 21, 10:45 am, "gatt" wrote:
"Jim Logajan" wrote in message

.. .

"gatt" wrote:
Furthermore, the moon is blue. Like, uh, nickel. Or moldy cheese.

You silly sod - it's not made of moldy cheese - it's probably made of Blue
Wensleydale. That's why humanity sent a man and his dog Gromit to the moon
- for the cheese!

AHHHH, it makes so much more sense now.

-c

But none of those NASA/Apollo EVAs of taking all of those unfiltered
Kodak moments and even of their more sensitive video were never
getting the least bit blue saturated. What gives?
- Brad Guth -

BradGuth wrote:
On Dec 21, 10:45 am, "gatt" wrote:
"Jim Logajan" wrote in message

.. .

"gatt" wrote:
Furthermore, the moon is blue. Like, uh, nickel. Or moldy
cheese.

You silly sod - it's not made of moldy cheese - it's probably made
of Blue Wensleydale. That's why humanity sent a man and his dog
Gromit to the moon - for the cheese!

AHHHH, it makes so much more sense now.

-c

But none of those NASA/Apollo EVAs of taking all of those unfiltered
Kodak moments and even of their more sensitive video were never
getting the least bit blue saturated. What gives?

Brad,

The original post in this thread was technically off topic for this
forum, but the poster otherwise had good intentions and was just
providing a friendly FYI to fellow readers.

Your posts, however, are often incoherent and unclear in their intent.
They are not only off topic for this forum, they assume presumptions few
posters to this group appear to share and demand answers to questions
that none of us either care to deal with or have the expertise and
knowledge to address.

I assume (but honestly can't tell, since you fail to make explicit claims
or provide sane reasoning - you just toss out questions on off topic
subjects) you think the Apollo moon landings were faked. Even if that
were true, it has nothing to do with piloting of aircraft. And it has
nothing to do with appreciating awesome moonscapes, real or invented.
Hell, I've pointed people toward great space art by Chesley Bonestell,
all of it "fake" but nevertheless great and inspiring work.

No one here can stop you from posting, but they can stop paying
attention, and the fault for that would be with _you_ and how you present
yourself and respond to others. If your objective is to get yourself
universally ignored, you are on the right track. If your objective is
anything else, you need to rethink your entire approach.

Good luck - IMHO you'll need it.

BradGuth wrote in news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
:

On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder wrote:
BradGuth wrote:

FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye.

Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can be pink.

Are you saying that China and Japan had each put blue bandpass filters
on their color cameras?
- Brad Guth -


Why, do they **** pink?


Bertie

On Dec 21, 10:41 am, "Kloudy via AviationKB.com" u33403@uwe wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
Besides JAXA as having been excluding those natural color images of
our moon, is there any good technical reason(s) as to why the JAXA/
SELENE(KAGUYA) science via their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and "Gamma
Ray Spectrometer(GRS)" is being kept secret?

-BradGuth-

Nice try...you're an idiot.

and not a very good troll.

this was hilarious, thanks

--
Message posted via AviationKB.comhttp://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/aviation/200712/1

Then where's that NASA/Apollo unfiltered Kodak moment of secondary/
recoil blue?

Or how about your sharing the other good one of where's Venus?
- Brad Guth -

On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
BradGuth wrote in news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
:

On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder wrote:
BradGuth wrote:

FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye.

Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can be pink.

Are you saying that China and Japan had each put blue bandpass filters
on their color cameras?
-BradGuth-

Why, do they **** pink?

Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a feather flock
together.
- Brad Guth

BradGuth wrote in news:8b969aa1-b7d9-4f71-b26b-
:

On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
BradGuth wrote in news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
:

On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder wrote:
BradGuth wrote:

FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye.

Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can be pink.

Are you saying that China and Japan had each put blue bandpass filters
on their color cameras?
-BradGuth-

Why, do they **** pink?

Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a feather flock
together.


Does this mean I have to get circumcised?


Bertie