![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Viperdoc" wrote in message ... This assumes that you are checked out in the plane, and that your insurance company agrees. For many complex airplanes, companies might require 20-100 hours time in type, and 20 or more of dual instruction before being covered, along with possibly an instructor sign-off. (an example is the Baron you talk about) I don't think insurance companies require a check-out for airplanes that come in a box and plug into the wall. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Emily writes:
Why wouldn't a light bulb be important for safety? Please read up on hazardous attitudes. Just because YOU don't think it's important doesn't mean you can break a regulation and install the incorrect bulb. Hardly something I'd expct you to understand. Please go back and read what I actually wrote (and you backquoted, right there, above). In the meantime, I find your reply very amusing! -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Wanttaja writes:
If you bought a new 172, the plane would require a special waiver to have long-range fuel tanks installed and flown across the Atlantic to France. Are there no ships these days? Anyway, I'd surely not be buying one in France. And it would probably be a Beechcraft rather than a Cessna, although I suppose the same problem exists in any case. The waiver wouldn't allow the ferry pilot to carry a passenger...and it would take you a long, long time to get qualified to make the flight yourself. Unless, of course, I already have that qualification. But I think it would be simpler to ship it by sea. And they're still not going to let you climb in at the exit point of the assembly line and be the first person to fly the airplane.... Why not? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Emily writes:
Overstressed airplanes shows signs of being overstressed. Examples? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Emily writes: Overstressed airplanes shows signs of being overstressed. Examples? The monitor and keyboard have cracks and the mouse ball is flat on one side. Sure signs of overstress. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Mxsmanic posted:
Emily writes: Overstressed airplanes shows signs of being overstressed. Examples? (sigh) Go the the airport and ask an A&P to show you some. That's one thing MSFS *won't* do. Neil |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Overstressed airplanes shows signs of being overstressed.
Examples? Wrinkles |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:45:34 +0200, Mxsmanic
wrote: And they're still not going to let you climb in at the exit point of the assembly line and be the first person to fly the airplane.... Why not? When assembly is complete the aircraft still doesn't have an airworthiness certificate and won't until the FAA and factory authorized test pilot has run the certification tests. IME, Cessna singles, for example, generally run 7-10 hours of certification, test, and fit&finish time on the hobbs at time of customer delivery at the factory, which is when the final signoffs and log entries are made. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:45:34 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote:
Ron Wanttaja writes: If you bought a new 172, the plane would require a special waiver to have long-range fuel tanks installed and flown across the Atlantic to France. Are there no ships these days? In most cases, it's cheaper and quicker to ferry it. Don't know on 172-class aircraft, though. In any case, you run the risks involved in getting damaged in transit or faulty re-assembly. I'd rather trust a ferry pilot. And they're still not going to let you climb in at the exit point of the assembly line and be the first person to fly the airplane.... Why not? If you are a qualified test pilot and employed by the manufacturer, you can. Otherwise, I'd say no. 14CFR 21.127 requires flight testing of newly-manufactured aircraft in accordance with an approved production flight-test procedure. I doubt the manufacturer's insurance policy will cover flight testing by a non-employee. Ron Wanttaja |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you mean installing a tractor light bulb instead of an
"aircraft" light bulb, sure, I know LOTS of owners like that. But I don't know any owner who would cut a safety corner. That's not a safety corner? Sure, they are probably built on the same assembly line (but maybe not) and they meet the same specs (but maybe not), but (FAA bashing aside) how do you know that this particular part is (or is not) as good as an approved part? Jose -- "Never trust anything that can think for itself, if you can't see where it keeps its brain." (chapter 10 of book 3 - Harry Potter). for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Florida Rentals | Arnold Sten | Piloting | 0 | December 14th 04 02:13 AM |
Wreckage of Privately Owned MiG-17 Found in New Mexico; Pilot Dead | Rusty Barton | Military Aviation | 1 | March 28th 04 10:51 PM |
Deliberate Undercounting of "Coalition" Fatalities | Jeffrey Smidt | Military Aviation | 1 | February 10th 04 07:11 PM |
Rentals in Colorado | PhyrePhox | Piloting | 11 | December 27th 03 03:45 AM |
Rentals at BUR | Dan Katz | Piloting | 0 | July 19th 03 06:38 PM |