A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pilot, possibly intoxicated, flies around Philly for 3 hours



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old January 19th 04, 12:46 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John T" wrote in message
ws.com...
What do you propose for privately owned airfields on private property?

What do people do for their garages (i.e., large trucks...).

Where do people park their 3/4 ton pickup trucks and large panel trucks?



  #42  
Old January 19th 04, 12:53 AM
Rob Perkins
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dave Stadt" wrote:

I don't need an ID badge to drive my car why should I need one to
fly my plane?


Uh, what's that state-issued thingy with your picture on it, if not an
ID badge?

Rob
  #43  
Old January 19th 04, 01:14 AM
Snowbird
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jonathan Goodish wrote in message ...
In what way would these measures protect the aircraft owners
at such airports from theft and vandalism? (hint: at work, I park
in a lot which is surrounded by a tall fence, gates operated by
individual badges, patrolled by security and under security camera
surveillance. we STILL have a problem with theft and vandalism.)


Having no security is unreasonable in my opinion.


Well, I don't think my airport has no security. My plane is in a
locked hangar. My plane is locked. It requires a key to start.
Perhaps most important, it's a community, where pilots know each
other and someone unfamiliar is watched and questioned if it seems
warrented.

If your local law enforcement was unwilling to respond to reports
of suspicious persons asking suspicious questions, perhaps your
local pilots need to cultivate better relationships with your
local law enforcement. "Law Enforcement Day at the Local Pilot's
Meeting" and a few boxes of donuts might go a ways.

having no
deterrent security at an airport is like leaving my car unlocked with
the keys in the ignition.


Um, actually, I think leaving your car unlocked with the keys
in the ignition is more like leaving your plane unlocked with the
keys in the ignition.

I also don't think that you can have one standard for larger airport and
another for smaller ones.


Why not? How far do you take this "one standard" bit? Should we
impose one standard for the security of federal buildings and small
businesses, even though the purposes they serve and the traffic they
handle is vastly different? Should we have one standard for all
public gatherings -- pro football games vs. my child's dance recital?

Makes not a jot of sense to me, but that seems to be what you're
suggesting for airports.

For example, it's okay to have no security
beyond a padlock at Podunk Field, Midwest, but I doubt that you'd agree
that it would be okay to have no security at BOS or LGA or JFK.


I think that's an eminently sensible situation. The planes which
frequent Podunk Field vs. LGA or even SUS have different capabilities.
The population is different.

Eventually, the bad guys are going to figure out that there is no
security at Podunk Field and capitalize on that fact.


Maybe. Maybe they are going to capitalize on a whole host of
freedoms of our society which are also security risks. How far
are we willing to go in sacrificing myriad daily freedoms because
they could, in theory, be exploited to cause harms? For example,
do you feel that rental of large trucks should immediately be banned
and sale restricted to those who have undergone special background
checks? Eventually, the bad guys are going to figure out that what
worked for McVeigh and in Africa could work here for them.

I'm sorry, I just don't see what is so unreasonable about controlled
access to the field. I don't see what is so unreasonable about ID
badges. I don't see what is so unreasonable about surveillence.


Then I will try to spell it out for you, though I lack confidence
in my abilities.

What is so unreasonable is that it would pose a large burden of
cost for what seems to be a very negligable benefit.

Nothing stops a determined terrorist from gaining access to a
secured field which requires ID badges. Yes, he could cut the
fence and take his chances with the typical low quality of
surveillance cameras and their monitors. But why?

All he needs is a confederate who has cleared the required security
and obtained the required credentials.

Do you really think it's reasonable to put thousands of small
airports out of business and ground tens of thousands of pilots
with your "reasonable" security measures, when they would do little
or nothing to deter a well-planned attempt?

Sheesh! If I've ever heard of an "I've got mine, Screw You"
attitude!

Sydney
  #44  
Old January 19th 04, 01:29 AM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Tom Sixkiller"
wrote:

Quite the contrary, my suggestions are quite reasonable, not expensive
(except for the surveillence), and far from useless.


Then you haven't priced any of them lately. Fencing alone could run 100

grand at
a small airport.



And it's only a deterrent; not a failsafe system.


not even a deterrent, just a tiny speed bump.

--
Bob Noel
  #45  
Old January 19th 04, 02:06 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
In article , "Tom Sixkiller"
wrote:

Quite the contrary, my suggestions are quite reasonable, not

expensive
(except for the surveillence), and far from useless.

Then you haven't priced any of them lately. Fencing alone could run

100
grand at
a small airport.



And it's only a deterrent; not a failsafe system.


not even a deterrent, just a tiny speed bump.

I call still lug my 51 year old ass over one of 'em.



  #46  
Old January 19th 04, 02:13 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Tom Sixkiller wrote:

What do people do for their garages (i.e., large trucks...).


Around here, they're typically parked in large open lots. A good example would
be the local UPS depot.

Where do people park their 3/4 ton pickup trucks and large panel trucks?


Well, my truck is only 1/4 ton, but it's in my driveway. The nearest U-haul outfit
is an open lot on route 35.

George Patterson
Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is
"Hummmmm... That's interesting...."
  #47  
Old January 19th 04, 02:24 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Tom Sixkiller wrote:

I call still lug my 51 year old ass over one of 'em.


Cowboy boots help. The toes fit well in chainlink.

George Patterson
Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is
"Hummmmm... That's interesting...."
  #48  
Old January 19th 04, 04:31 AM
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Rob Perkins" wrote in message
...
"Dave Stadt" wrote:

I don't need an ID badge to drive my car why should I need one to
fly my plane?


Uh, what's that state-issued thingy with your picture on it, if not an
ID badge?

Rob


It sure as hell isn't an ID badge.


  #49  
Old January 19th 04, 05:39 AM
Snowbird
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jonathan Goodish wrote in message ...

Fact is, you do need an ID badge to drive your car, it's called a
driver's license.


Um...so, since I need a pilot's license to fly plus another
form of govm't issued photo ID --- you're actually arguing
that no further identification is necessary?

Jonathan, your analogies seem to need a little buffing-up.

What I'm hearing from you detractors is that you don't believe there
should be ANY security at GA fields


Really? Where are you hearing that?

What I'm hearing is that I, and apparently some others, don't
feel your suggested security measures are "reasonable".

It seems rather a cognitive leap to go from "they don't
think my ideas are reasonable" to "they don't believe
there should be ANY security at GA fields.

snip

Just as with securing your house, nothing you do is going to stop the
determined burglar. What you can do things to make execution of the
crime more difficult and time consuming while still retaining
unrestricted movement in your house.


I really think the "house" analogy for an airport is not quite
apt.

A public-use airport is not a house. It is a business, and
as such must provide access to everyone who needs to use it.
Charter customers, line boys, student pilots, flight instructors,
custodians, mechanics so forth and so on.

Therein lies the weakest point of any security system for a public-
use facility. It's often not strangers breaking down the doors,
but people who've been granted access who commit illegal acts.

So exactly how much deterrent value does that fence and security
system provide, and how does that compare to its cost and the
effect that cost will have on small airports and the small businesses
trying to make a living there, if you try to enforce "one standard
to fit all"?

At some airports, security systems such as you describe seem
justified and reasonable. At others, why on earth?

Cheers,
Sydney
  #50  
Old January 19th 04, 05:43 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dave Stadt" wrote in message
...

"Rob Perkins" wrote in message
...
"Dave Stadt" wrote:

I don't need an ID badge to drive my car why should I need one to
fly my plane?


Uh, what's that state-issued thingy with your picture on it, if not an
ID badge?

Rob


It sure as hell isn't an ID badge.



If it's in your wallet in your back pocket, would that be "mooning" someone?



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Former pilot to win seat as MP Ben Hoover Military Aviation 0 May 29th 04 01:03 AM
Catastrophic Decompression; Small Place Solo Aviation Piloting 193 January 13th 04 08:52 PM
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation Gilan Home Built 17 September 24th 03 06:11 AM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.