![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John T" wrote in message ws.com... What do you propose for privately owned airfields on private property? What do people do for their garages (i.e., large trucks...). Where do people park their 3/4 ton pickup trucks and large panel trucks? |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave Stadt" wrote:
I don't need an ID badge to drive my car why should I need one to fly my plane? Uh, what's that state-issued thingy with your picture on it, if not an ID badge? Rob |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jonathan Goodish wrote in message ...
In what way would these measures protect the aircraft owners at such airports from theft and vandalism? (hint: at work, I park in a lot which is surrounded by a tall fence, gates operated by individual badges, patrolled by security and under security camera surveillance. we STILL have a problem with theft and vandalism.) Having no security is unreasonable in my opinion. Well, I don't think my airport has no security. My plane is in a locked hangar. My plane is locked. It requires a key to start. Perhaps most important, it's a community, where pilots know each other and someone unfamiliar is watched and questioned if it seems warrented. If your local law enforcement was unwilling to respond to reports of suspicious persons asking suspicious questions, perhaps your local pilots need to cultivate better relationships with your local law enforcement. "Law Enforcement Day at the Local Pilot's Meeting" and a few boxes of donuts might go a ways. having no deterrent security at an airport is like leaving my car unlocked with the keys in the ignition. Um, actually, I think leaving your car unlocked with the keys in the ignition is more like leaving your plane unlocked with the keys in the ignition. I also don't think that you can have one standard for larger airport and another for smaller ones. Why not? How far do you take this "one standard" bit? Should we impose one standard for the security of federal buildings and small businesses, even though the purposes they serve and the traffic they handle is vastly different? Should we have one standard for all public gatherings -- pro football games vs. my child's dance recital? Makes not a jot of sense to me, but that seems to be what you're suggesting for airports. For example, it's okay to have no security beyond a padlock at Podunk Field, Midwest, but I doubt that you'd agree that it would be okay to have no security at BOS or LGA or JFK. I think that's an eminently sensible situation. The planes which frequent Podunk Field vs. LGA or even SUS have different capabilities. The population is different. Eventually, the bad guys are going to figure out that there is no security at Podunk Field and capitalize on that fact. Maybe. Maybe they are going to capitalize on a whole host of freedoms of our society which are also security risks. How far are we willing to go in sacrificing myriad daily freedoms because they could, in theory, be exploited to cause harms? For example, do you feel that rental of large trucks should immediately be banned and sale restricted to those who have undergone special background checks? Eventually, the bad guys are going to figure out that what worked for McVeigh and in Africa could work here for them. I'm sorry, I just don't see what is so unreasonable about controlled access to the field. I don't see what is so unreasonable about ID badges. I don't see what is so unreasonable about surveillence. Then I will try to spell it out for you, though I lack confidence in my abilities. What is so unreasonable is that it would pose a large burden of cost for what seems to be a very negligable benefit. Nothing stops a determined terrorist from gaining access to a secured field which requires ID badges. Yes, he could cut the fence and take his chances with the typical low quality of surveillance cameras and their monitors. But why? All he needs is a confederate who has cleared the required security and obtained the required credentials. Do you really think it's reasonable to put thousands of small airports out of business and ground tens of thousands of pilots with your "reasonable" security measures, when they would do little or nothing to deter a well-planned attempt? Sheesh! If I've ever heard of an "I've got mine, Screw You" attitude! Sydney |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Tom Sixkiller"
wrote: Quite the contrary, my suggestions are quite reasonable, not expensive (except for the surveillence), and far from useless. Then you haven't priced any of them lately. Fencing alone could run 100 grand at a small airport. And it's only a deterrent; not a failsafe system. not even a deterrent, just a tiny speed bump. -- Bob Noel |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Noel" wrote in message ... In article , "Tom Sixkiller" wrote: Quite the contrary, my suggestions are quite reasonable, not expensive (except for the surveillence), and far from useless. Then you haven't priced any of them lately. Fencing alone could run 100 grand at a small airport. And it's only a deterrent; not a failsafe system. not even a deterrent, just a tiny speed bump. I call still lug my 51 year old ass over one of 'em. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Tom Sixkiller wrote: What do people do for their garages (i.e., large trucks...). Around here, they're typically parked in large open lots. A good example would be the local UPS depot. Where do people park their 3/4 ton pickup trucks and large panel trucks? Well, my truck is only 1/4 ton, but it's in my driveway. The nearest U-haul outfit is an open lot on route 35. George Patterson Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is "Hummmmm... That's interesting...." |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Tom Sixkiller wrote: I call still lug my 51 year old ass over one of 'em. Cowboy boots help. The toes fit well in chainlink. George Patterson Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is "Hummmmm... That's interesting...." |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rob Perkins" wrote in message ... "Dave Stadt" wrote: I don't need an ID badge to drive my car why should I need one to fly my plane? Uh, what's that state-issued thingy with your picture on it, if not an ID badge? Rob It sure as hell isn't an ID badge. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jonathan Goodish wrote in message ...
Fact is, you do need an ID badge to drive your car, it's called a driver's license. Um...so, since I need a pilot's license to fly plus another form of govm't issued photo ID --- you're actually arguing that no further identification is necessary? Jonathan, your analogies seem to need a little buffing-up. What I'm hearing from you detractors is that you don't believe there should be ANY security at GA fields Really? Where are you hearing that? What I'm hearing is that I, and apparently some others, don't feel your suggested security measures are "reasonable". It seems rather a cognitive leap to go from "they don't think my ideas are reasonable" to "they don't believe there should be ANY security at GA fields. snip Just as with securing your house, nothing you do is going to stop the determined burglar. What you can do things to make execution of the crime more difficult and time consuming while still retaining unrestricted movement in your house. I really think the "house" analogy for an airport is not quite apt. A public-use airport is not a house. It is a business, and as such must provide access to everyone who needs to use it. Charter customers, line boys, student pilots, flight instructors, custodians, mechanics so forth and so on. Therein lies the weakest point of any security system for a public- use facility. It's often not strangers breaking down the doors, but people who've been granted access who commit illegal acts. So exactly how much deterrent value does that fence and security system provide, and how does that compare to its cost and the effect that cost will have on small airports and the small businesses trying to make a living there, if you try to enforce "one standard to fit all"? At some airports, security systems such as you describe seem justified and reasonable. At others, why on earth? Cheers, Sydney |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Stadt" wrote in message ... "Rob Perkins" wrote in message ... "Dave Stadt" wrote: I don't need an ID badge to drive my car why should I need one to fly my plane? Uh, what's that state-issued thingy with your picture on it, if not an ID badge? Rob It sure as hell isn't an ID badge. If it's in your wallet in your back pocket, would that be "mooning" someone? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Former pilot to win seat as MP | Ben Hoover | Military Aviation | 0 | May 29th 04 01:03 AM |
Catastrophic Decompression; Small Place Solo | Aviation | Piloting | 193 | January 13th 04 08:52 PM |
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation | Gilan | Home Built | 17 | September 24th 03 06:11 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |