![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They don't. They turn them on during descent because otherwise they would
still be cold enough to be fragile even after getting down into warmer air. Why do they run them at altitudes that birds don't fly? If Mythbusters had cooled that side window to -50C, it would have disintegrated when the bullet hit it. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]() As a side note on this, I'm pretty sure I once heard in a lecture or presentation -- no!, it was in a wonderful quasi-documentary movie about birds; was the title perhaps something like "Flight"? -- "Winged Migration". Excellent movie, every pilot should see it. Twice. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:55:36 -0400, MichaelR wrote:
They don't. They turn them on during descent because otherwise they would still be cold enough to be fragile even after getting down into warmer air. My company's procedure for the 737 is to turn on the window heat a minimum of ten minutes prior to takeoff and leave it on until parked at the arrival gate. The window heat can be left all day long if desired. -Jack Davis B737 -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jack" wrote in message Do you have other information?
Yes, but I am prohibited by TSA law from disclosing any more. D. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Few notes -
Some years ago I hit a red-tail hawk on the left windscreen of a 707 at 16,000 ft climbing out of Houston. Made a mess - no damage. If we lost windshield heat, our limitation was 250 kts below 14,0000 ft. Guess that bird didn't know he shouldn't fly that high. Also some years ago, I saw a Gulfstream that belonged to a Middle East head of state at a US repair facility with a bullet hole that entered in the belly and went out the top. They flew it normally all the way to the States The Gulfstream carries a higher pressure differential than any airliner I know of with an 8,000 ft cabin at 51,000 ft. and usually cruises about M .82 on long flights. Aircraft pressurization is controlled by how much air gets let out by the outflow valve/s. With a small hole or two, the outflow valve/s would automatically close a bit and the aircraft would pressurize normally anyway. If you do a ground pressure check on any aircraft, they leak all over the place anyway. In flight it would just whistle a bit louder and that's all. Forget the pressure vessel as far as I'm concerned. What about those rather large wire bundles being fed by a couple of 120 KvA generators? Ask Swiss air. How about the primary control system, hydraulic systems, or 20,000 gal of fuel? Fuel; ask TWA/ American. What would happen if that 9 mm went through the fly-by-wire boxes on a B-777 or Airbus? Don't know that one yet, but I hope we never find out. Myself, I'd be just as happy if they'd leave the cockpit door locked and used the crash axe if necessary. Besides, I know some of those guys that fly those things and there are a few I wouldn't want to see with a gun!!! |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Don Hammer" wrote in message ... Myself, I'd be just as happy if they'd leave the cockpit door locked and used the crash axe if necessary. Besides, I know some of those guys that fly those things and there are a few I wouldn't want to see with a gun!!! Would you fly with them? |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Don Hammer" wrote in message ... Besides, I know some of those guys that fly those things and there are a few I wouldn't want to see with a gun!!! Amen to that, Don. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "Don Hammer" wrote in message ... Besides, I know some of those guys that fly those things and there are a few I wouldn't want to see with a gun!!! Amen to that, Don. And this proves...what? |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message news:KOeJc.45 ... Besides, I know some of those guys that fly those things and there are a few I wouldn't want to see with a gun!!! Amen to that, Don. And this proves...what? It proves nothing, Tom. I was merely concurring in Don's opinion. If you need any further clarification, just ask. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know some of those
guys that fly those things and there are a few I wouldn't want to see with a gun!!! Instead of an airpane? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mythbusters Explosive Decompression Experiment | C J Campbell | Piloting | 49 | January 16th 04 07:12 AM |
More Explosive Decompression | John Galban | Piloting | 5 | January 7th 04 09:34 PM |