A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NOTAM



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old August 28th 04, 10:16 PM
Tom S.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Martin X. Moleski, SJ" wrote in message
...

It seems to me that flying is not a right; it is a privilege and a
joy.


Actually, flying IS a right. In the US, our rights are not granted by our
government, we simply have them.


Actually, you're both wrong...sorta.

What you have is the natural right to travel/move about freely in public.
HOW you move about, though, is subject to limitations. Same with driving.
Same with guns: you have the right to a proper self-defense and
self-protection, but not necessarily a right to own/carry GUNS.

Travel/freedom of movement is PRIMARY; the right to FLY is derivative.


--
"A mind, like a home, is furnished by its owner,
so if one's life is cold and bare he can blame
none but himself." -- Louis L'Amour


  #42  
Old August 28th 04, 10:53 PM
Bill Denton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You might want to rethink your "guns" theory...

From the Second Amendment: "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,
shall not be infringed"

From www.dictionary.com: arms - "A weapon, especially a firearm" and: gun -
"A portable firearm, such as a rifle or revolver".

A gun is a firearm, a firearm is an arm. The Second doesn't refer to SOME
arms and by not specifically delineating what arms may be owned or
possessed, the right is extended to ALL arms.

So, in fact, we do have a Constitutional right to "own/carry GUNS".






"Tom S." wrote in message
...

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Martin X. Moleski, SJ" wrote in message
...

It seems to me that flying is not a right; it is a privilege and a
joy.


Actually, flying IS a right. In the US, our rights are not granted by

our
government, we simply have them.


Actually, you're both wrong...sorta.

What you have is the natural right to travel/move about freely in public.
HOW you move about, though, is subject to limitations. Same with driving.
Same with guns: you have the right to a proper self-defense and
self-protection, but not necessarily a right to own/carry GUNS.

Travel/freedom of movement is PRIMARY; the right to FLY is derivative.


--
"A mind, like a home, is furnished by its owner,
so if one's life is cold and bare he can blame
none but himself." -- Louis L'Amour




  #43  
Old August 30th 04, 06:25 PM
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
Depends on the modeler and the model.
I would say that on most flights I get above 500' AGL at least
some of the time.


How do you know it's altitude?


You might notice that the NOTAM in question assumes that
the FAA can ban model flights altogether, regardless of the
altitude. It may be overreaching, but I don't have the money
to take them to court to prove that it is.


The US government doesn't have Constitutional authority for most of it's
activities.


14 CFR 101

  #44  
Old August 30th 04, 11:43 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"john smith" wrote in message
...

14 CFR 101


What about it?


  #45  
Old September 2nd 04, 09:53 PM
Bob Kaplow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Bill Denton" writes:
You might want to rethink your "guns" theory...

From the Second Amendment: "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,
shall not be infringed"

From www.dictionary.com: arms - "A weapon, especially a firearm" and: gun -
"A portable firearm, such as a rifle or revolver".

A gun is a firearm, a firearm is an arm. The Second doesn't refer to SOME
arms and by not specifically delineating what arms may be owned or
possessed, the right is extended to ALL arms.

So, in fact, we do have a Constitutional right to "own/carry GUNS".


Actually, we should have more than that. When the Bill of Rights was
written, we had the right to own the most powerful weapons on the planet.
Right now, I'll settle for a fully armed F15 :-)

Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD"
To reply, remove the TRABoD!

Kaplow Klips & Baffle: http://nira-rocketry.org/LeadingEdge/Phantom4000.pdf
www.encompasserve.org/~kaplow_r/ www.nira-rocketry.org www.nar.org

Save Model Rocketry from the HSA! http://www.space-rockets.com/congress.html
  #46  
Old September 7th 04, 02:17 AM
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Marty

When it's a wee widdle thing, you know 'tis a way out there.

Big John
Expert R/C Pilot
`````````````````````````````````````````````````` ``````````````````````````````````````````````

MaartyOn Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:24:19 -0700, "David Herman"
wrote:


"Martin X. Moleski, SJ" wrote in message
.. .

Seems to me I've also seen some alititude restrictions imposed
on RC models flying near full-scale airfields. I think that at my
field (Reservoir Park, Lewiston, NY), we're technically
not supposed to go above 500 feet. Some of the larger
models (~40% scale) apparently can be seen on the radar
screens at Niagara Falls (IAG).


Marty,

A dumb question: other than eyeballing and estimating, how exactly does
someone controlling a RC model know its altitude?


  #47  
Old September 7th 04, 02:49 PM
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


David

We bought and own our flying field. What will they do, put a lien on
it?

Big John

On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:10:13 -0700, "David Herman"
wrote:

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Ash Wyllie" wrote in message
...
--

I wonder how many modelers even know that NOTAMS even exist?


What are they going to do: take your model airplane license away?


Well, they might just shoot you.

If they intercept your killer Skyhawk and you don't land or respond to their
radio calls, wing-wags or flares, that's what I assume they would do to you
or me.


  #48  
Old September 7th 04, 03:11 PM
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

C.J.

Hoax, Hoax, Hoax

Just called long distance and talked to secretary of Marynoll R.C
Club. As of yesterday (Labor day) nothing like posted has happened.

Some people seems to have more time to waste than smarts. Guess they
like to cry wolf.

Big John


On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 17:45:09 -0700, "C J Campbell"
wrote:


"David Herman" wrote in message
news:1093630607.592832@yasure...
"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Ash Wyllie" wrote in message
...
--

I wonder how many modelers even know that NOTAMS even exist?


What are they going to do: take your model airplane license away?


Well, they might just shoot you.


Redmond, WA (AP) -- Model Airplane Enthusiast Shot by Secret Service

Model airplane enthusiast David Adams was shot and killed by Secret Service
agents today as hundreds of young soccer players and their parents looked on
in horror. The Marymoor model airplane field was supposed to be closed
during Presidential candidate John Kerry's visit to Microsoft, but no
notices were posted. Agents claimed that they had attempted to shout
warnings to Adams, who had lost his hearing when a hand grenade exploded
near him while he was stationed with the Marines in Afghanistan. Agents for
the Secret Service accused Adams of being a potential terrorist who might
use his model plane in an attack.

The FAA had issued notices to pilots that there was to be no model airplane
activity at the park, but local RC modelers claimed that they had never
received them. Adams is survived by his wife and two small children. The
Kerry campaign expressed regret at the incident and claimed that critics of
the shooting had links to the Bush campaign. Kerry himself noted that Adams
was a contributor to the Bush campaign.

------------------------------------------

Nope. Don't see it happening. Presidential candidates have just too tough a
time getting elected if their bodyguards go around shooting people at
random.


  #49  
Old September 7th 04, 05:49 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Big John" wrote in message
...
C.J.

Hoax, Hoax, Hoax

Just called long distance and talked to secretary of Marynoll R.C
Club. As of yesterday (Labor day) nothing like posted has happened.


"Marynoll"? What's that?

In any case, pretty much the rest of us were able to figure out that CJ's
post was not intended to be a real Associated Press report. He wrote it
himself, as a parody.


Some people seems to have more time to waste than smarts.


Indeed.

Guess they like to cry wolf.


Yeah, like accusing someone of intentionally trying to mislead others, when
they obviously did not?

Pete


  #50  
Old September 8th 04, 01:33 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Big John" wrote in message
...
C.J.

Hoax, Hoax, Hoax

Just called long distance and talked to secretary of Marynoll R.C
Club. As of yesterday (Labor day) nothing like posted has happened.


Uh, John? I wrote it myself ... it was meant to be satirical. I thought it
was rather obvious.

Marymoor Park (not Marynoll) is a real park near Microsoft headquarters in
Redmond. It has a model airplane field which has an interesting history. The
runway was originally in another location, but a bald eagle nested in the
vicinity and environmentalists demanded that the runway be closed or moved
(preferably closed). The club moved the runway to its present location and
the eagle promptly moved his nest in order to stay close to the field (if
you know eagles, an eagle moving his nest is a big deal, so he must have
really wanted to stay close to the runway). Club members theorize that the
eagle just likes to watch R.C. airplanes, perhaps because there are a number
of people who fly gliders there. The gliders might make it easy for the
eagle to find thermals. Others think the eagle just wants to keep a close
eye on what he may consider to be potential competitors or even prey, or
maybe he just likes the company.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What does SWEPT mean in a NOTAM? Roy Smith General Aviation 2 January 30th 05 08:42 PM
funny(?) GPS NOTAM Kyler Laird General Aviation 6 August 18th 04 03:08 PM
WinNotam - new Notam organizer tool JetVision Software Instrument Flight Rules 0 December 14th 03 08:00 PM
WinNotam - new Notam organizer tool JetVision Software Military Aviation 0 December 14th 03 08:00 PM
Misleading Notam Greg Esres Instrument Flight Rules 12 December 3rd 03 04:16 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.