![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In some occations it might be handy to use the cellphone in the airplane,
but the noisy atmosphere makes it somewhat difficult. I found an ad for an interesting "box" that connects a handphone to the intercom/headset allowing for better quality communications. http://www.flightcell.co.nz/flightce...flighcell.html Any experience out there regarding the Flightcell IV, that also allows for plugin of a handheld comm-set that might be handy in case of a radio failure? I am also aware that some of the newer ANR headsets allows for plug-in of cellphones. -- Christian ENZV |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
$349 is a ridiculous price. I have the cellset. www.cellset.com Many
headsets now have an interface built right in. Christian wrote: In some occations it might be handy to use the cellphone in the airplane, but the noisy atmosphere makes it somewhat difficult. I found an ad for an interesting "box" that connects a handphone to the intercom/headset allowing for better quality communications. http://www.flightcell.co.nz/flightce...flighcell.html Any experience out there regarding the Flightcell IV, that also allows for plugin of a handheld comm-set that might be handy in case of a radio failure? I am also aware that some of the newer ANR headsets allows for plug-in of cellphones. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You'd probably think differently if you knew what it cost to make it.
"Newps" wrote in message ... $349 is a ridiculous price. I have the cellset. www.cellset.com Many headsets now have an interface built right in. Christian wrote: In some occations it might be handy to use the cellphone in the airplane, but the noisy atmosphere makes it somewhat difficult. I found an ad for an interesting "box" that connects a handphone to the intercom/headset allowing for better quality communications. http://www.flightcell.co.nz/flightce...flighcell.html Any experience out there regarding the Flightcell IV, that also allows for plugin of a handheld comm-set that might be handy in case of a radio failure? I am also aware that some of the newer ANR headsets allows for plug-in of cellphones. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cockpit Colin" wrote in message ... You'd probably think differently if you knew what it cost to make it. Ohh don't go there, I have reverse engineered many electronics devices in my 9 years being an E.E. I know the cost of electronics devices quality of PCB's and components & workmanship. None of the cell phone adapters would cost over $5.00ea to have mass produced and that is a high estimate using good parts with tolerances of 1-2% not 5 to 10% and for $300.00 I could build 20 of them using US supply houses. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Um - actually I work with the chap runs the flightcell company, and have
been privvy to a lot of "behind the scenes" info. I'm afraid to say, you couldn't be further from the truth. Additionally, if you can supply all the components for less than $5 (same quality) I'm sure we could get you a 100% margin and make you a very rich person. It's not just the components - it's the research and development - the marketing - the wages - the rent - hell, even a bit of profit (and not as much as you're thinking). The mould for the case alone cost over $5,000 USD. Interestingly the USAF took a look at them and have bought over 1200 of them, with more to follow. Only cell phone interface endorsed by Bose too. (PS: I've been involved in electronics / avionics for 26 years) Just my 10c worth. "NW_PILOT" wrote in message ... "Cockpit Colin" wrote in message ... You'd probably think differently if you knew what it cost to make it. Ohh don't go there, I have reverse engineered many electronics devices in my 9 years being an E.E. I know the cost of electronics devices quality of PCB's and components & workmanship. None of the cell phone adapters would cost over $5.00ea to have mass produced and that is a high estimate using good parts with tolerances of 1-2% not 5 to 10% and for $300.00 I could build 20 of them using US supply houses. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just in from the creator ...
Quote ... There is no component in Flightcell with more than 1% tolerance. There are in excess of 180 components on the PCB. The connectors cost minimum $10 USD each and there are up to 4 of those. Add to this 5 digital pots at $12 each and already you can see ... AND ... If he signs a NDA, we will send him all the drawings. If he can make it cheaper than we can without any reduction in quality then we will send all our production to him. How's that for challenge. This is a serious offer!!!! [END QUOTE] So, is anyone going to take him up on the offer? "NW_PILOT" wrote in message ... "Cockpit Colin" wrote in message ... You'd probably think differently if you knew what it cost to make it. Ohh don't go there, I have reverse engineered many electronics devices in my 9 years being an E.E. I know the cost of electronics devices quality of PCB's and components & workmanship. None of the cell phone adapters would cost over $5.00ea to have mass produced and that is a high estimate using good parts with tolerances of 1-2% not 5 to 10% and for $300.00 I could build 20 of them using US supply houses. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a friend from New Zealand who says that they "require" you to have a
cell phone interface wired through the audio panel. Anybody from NZ with details? Mike MU-2 "Cockpit Colin" wrote in message ... Just in from the creator ... Quote ... There is no component in Flightcell with more than 1% tolerance. There are in excess of 180 components on the PCB. The connectors cost minimum $10 USD each and there are up to 4 of those. Add to this 5 digital pots at $12 each and already you can see ... AND ... If he signs a NDA, we will send him all the drawings. If he can make it cheaper than we can without any reduction in quality then we will send all our production to him. How's that for challenge. This is a serious offer!!!! [END QUOTE] So, is anyone going to take him up on the offer? "NW_PILOT" wrote in message ... "Cockpit Colin" wrote in message ... You'd probably think differently if you knew what it cost to make it. Ohh don't go there, I have reverse engineered many electronics devices in my 9 years being an E.E. I know the cost of electronics devices quality of PCB's and components & workmanship. None of the cell phone adapters would cost over $5.00ea to have mass produced and that is a high estimate using good parts with tolerances of 1-2% not 5 to 10% and for $300.00 I could build 20 of them using US supply houses. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cockpit Colin" wrote in message ... Just in from the creator ... Quote ... There is no component in Flightcell with more than 1% tolerance. There are in excess of 180 components on the PCB. Ok well they can talk but until they start giving manufacture part #'s and if surface mount reel #'s and lot #'s I would say they are using the cheapest parts their contract mfg can get their hands on. The connectors cost minimum $10 USD each and there are up to 4 of those. Add to this 5 digital Yea Right!!!! Provide a Part # pots at $12 each and already you can see ... Still no part #'s to back up their claim AND ... If he signs a NDA, we will send him all the drawings. If he can make it Sign a non disclosure agreement hahaha why would I want to do that I would just buy one take it apart get all the part #'s values & redraw the pcb with minor changes & improvements being sure not to infringe on their intlectual property. Or use a schmetaic capture and redraw the PCB from a schematic then make some changes thicken a trade here and there add a layer ect.. The only real expensive thing would be the injection molds & molding to house the device but could get that down to a reasonable price if production quantity was sufficient. Ohh and if I signed an NDA and found out they were using substandard parts I could not say anything becuse of the NDA. cheaper than we can without any reduction in quality then we will send all our production to him. I Humm tempting but NO, not with a NDA. Better yet why dont they try a few places below and outsource it themselves I would do it but I require customers to make schematics publicaly avaiable due to liability reasons. The PCB mfg's below are some of the major players in the asian market today some can do up to 24 layer poly-u boards and most have their own contract mfg facilitys. Onpress Printed Circuits Limited http://www.onpress.com.hk Three Sun Enterprise Co Ltd http://www.three-sun.com Shenzhen Shennan Circuits Co Ltd http://www.shennancircuits.com Xing Da Printed Circuit Board Manufacturer http://www.zsxingda.com Global Expert Technologies Ltd http://www.getpwb.com Evergreen PCB Fty Ltd http://www.evergreenpcb.com I Have about 100 More Contract MFG's & PCB MFG's on my list that I use. These are a few top players in Asia. Please Fwd this to who ever tell them to have fun but no MFG's will even touch their Gerber Files or Drill Data with an NDA as they may have to subcontract the work. How's that for challenge. This is a serious offer!!!! Not to serious of an offer with a NDA how could it be outsourced with a NDA [END QUOTE] So, is anyone going to take him up on the offer? As I said above No MFG's will even touch their Gerber Files or Drill Data with an NDA as they may have to subcontract the work. I take that offer a as insult and so would other's. You will see when dealing with Asian Corporate Businessmen they expect to be treated with trust and respect it's a totally different set of business ethics not like the U.S. market ware it needs to be earned no wonder their production costs are high. Most contract mfg's will not disclose your details anyway unless it kills someone. NW_Pilot PP-ASEL |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cockpit,
You'd probably think differently if you knew what it cost to make it. You're kidding, right? If one company can produce a full ANR headset with a cell phone adapter for what another company charges for the cell phone adapter alone, one of the two is ripping its clients off. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I suggest you take a look at the product first - you're not comparing apples
with apples. For starters the headset one is more than likely a simple analog input whereas the flightcell is fully microprocessor controlled - has built in intercom - satelite input/output - individual gain control on all channels - interferance rejection etc. Honestly, it't not just a case of twisting a few wires and throwing in a few resistors. "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... Cockpit, You'd probably think differently if you knew what it cost to make it. You're kidding, right? If one company can produce a full ANR headset with a cell phone adapter for what another company charges for the cell phone adapter alone, one of the two is ripping its clients off. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Peltor Headset Experience | Mark T. Mueller | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | June 6th 04 07:40 PM |
Headset music | Neil Bratney | Piloting | 23 | April 27th 04 12:59 PM |
Bose makes good on my wife's headset. | Kyler Laird | General Aviation | 3 | March 10th 04 02:08 PM |
Bose makes good on my wife's headset. | Kyler Laird | Piloting | 3 | March 10th 04 02:08 PM |
Headset wanted | Mike Cunningham | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 25th 03 01:26 AM |