![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, October 24, 2014 10:40:08 AM UTC-4, John Carlyle wrote:
I've experienced simulated power failures and simulated rope breaks just after I'm flying but the tow plane isn't. .. .. .. The simulated tow plane power failure was not a piece of cake. It took a few seconds to figure out that something was wrong, find the release and transition to landing mode. The case of the towplane being on the ground and aborting takeoff when the glider is flying in ground effect is problematic. If the runway has poor straight ahead landing options (I mean poor options for landing after a 100 AGL engine failure), then aborting takeoff before the towplane leaves the ground, even for an unconfirmed engine/pilot problem, is understandable. But the glider having much less drag is fated to fly past the tow plane (if it avoids collision). Is it possible for the glider to turn fast enough to avoid colliding with the towplane? What happens when a glider touches a wingtip to the ground at 40 knots? At what velocity does the glider have enough energy to fly over top of the towplane? Or is that impossible? Any experiences/thoughts? |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Its all "communication"..
But the whole point of the "turn" signal is that the tow pilot doesn't need to or try to "fight" it. So which signals do you use radio for and which signals do you use the standard accepted signal? Do you brief glider pilots as to which signals you do not respond to and which you do? Has the SSA changed/adopted the accepted signal for "tow plane please turn" to now a "radio signal"? When the tow plane rudder hits the stop, what happens? It snap rolls!!!?? Cookie On Sunday, October 26, 2014 6:48:57 AM UTC-4, Bruce Hoult wrote: On 2014-10-26 09:45:47 +0000, Cookie said: Ok...and signalling a turn by moving out to the side will not make the towplane hit its rudder stops either ...so what's the problem? Shall we now replace all 17 of the "standard American soaring signals"...with "use radio"? Cookie If boxing the wake causes the towplane to reach control stops then you are doing it WAY WRONG and should expect to wear the rope, yes. If it's mere communication ... like wagging your wings ... that's one thing. If it's physically pulling the tail around against the tow pllot attempting to maintain his intended heading then that's quite another. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So, you're saying the rudder won't even be near the stop on a typical box the wake, or "please turn" signal....so what's the problem?
Cookie On Sunday, October 26, 2014 7:03:30 AM UTC-4, Bruce Hoult wrote: On 2014-10-26 09:45:47 +0000, Cookie said: Ok...and signalling a turn by moving out to the side will not make the towplane hit its rudder stops either ...so what's the problem? Shall we now replace all 17 of the "standard American soaring signals"...with "use radio"? Cookie If boxing the wake causes the towplane to reach control stops then you are doing it WAY WRONG and should expect to wear the rope, yes. Btw: Pawnee wingspan 36 ft 2 in. So out at his wingtip you are 5.5 m off center. On a 60m rope that's 5.3 degrees angle on the rope. If the glider weighs 600 kg and has a 30:1 L/D at towing speed then there will be 20 kg of pull in the rope from drag, plus (at 600 fpm, 3 m/s climb and 70 knots 38 m/s airspeed) another 48 kg pull from climbing. Total 68 kg. About 6 kg of which will be sideways pull on the tail. Anyone want to figure out how much rudder deflection it takes to produce 6 kg sideways force at 70 knots? It won't be a lot. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2014-10-26 13:20:35 +0000, Cookie said:
Its all "communication".. But the whole point of the "turn" signal is that the tow pilot doesn't need to or try to "fight" it. So which signals do you use radio for and which signals do you use the standard accepted signal? Do you brief glider pilots as to which signals you do not respond to and which you do? Has the SSA changed/adopted the accepted signal for "tow plane please turn" to now a "radio signal"? When the tow plane rudder hits the stop, what happens? It snap rolls!!!?? Cookie On Sunday, October 26, 2014 6:48:57 AM UTC-4, Bruce Hoult wrote: On 2014-10-26 09:45:47 +0000, Cookie said: Ok...and signalling a turn by moving out to the side will not make the towplane hit its rudder stops either ...so what's the problem? Shall we now replace all 17 of the "standard American soaring signals"...with "use radio"? Cookie If boxing the wake causes the towplane to reach control stops then you are doing it WAY WRONG and should expect to wear the rope, yes. If it's mere communication ... like wagging your wings ... that's one thing. If it's physically pulling the tail around against the tow pllot attempting to maintain his intended heading then that's quite another. In this country there are two standard accepted non-radio signals from the towplane, and one from the glider: From towplane: - release immediately - check your airbrakes From glider: - I am unable to release Anything else is prearranged before takeoff, or else in flight over the radio. The SSA has no influence here. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, October 26, 2014 8:59:46 AM UTC-4, son_of_flubber wrote:
The case of the towplane being on the ground and aborting takeoff when the glider is flying in ground effect is problematic. If the runway has poor straight ahead landing options (I mean poor options for landing after a 100 AGL engine failure), then aborting takeoff before the towplane leaves the ground, even for an unconfirmed engine/pilot problem, is understandable. But the glider having much less drag is fated to fly past the tow plane (if it avoids collision). Is it possible for the glider to turn fast enough to avoid colliding with the towplane? What happens when a glider touches a wingtip to the ground at 40 knots? At what velocity does the glider have enough energy to fly over top of the towplane? Or is that impossible? Any experiences/thoughts? I don't understand why you call low level tow plane engine failure "problematic". I've seen two actual low level engine failures in ten years of glider flying (to be specific, the glider was flying and the tow plane was not). Tow planes lead a rough life and engine failures do happen, a lot more than we'd like. Your comment "the glider is fated to fly past the tow plane" is exactly why (1) you need to prepare for this and (2) you need to see this situation for real. Yes, you can turn to avoid the tow plane if (and only if) you recognize that you must do so soon enough. If you touch a wingtip at 40 kt you will be in for Mr. Toad's wild ride - hopefully you and the glider will not need major repairs. I wouldn't even think about trying to fly over the tow plane - but then the runways I fly from have lots of good grass on their sides. Again, the point I was trying to make is that a low level tow plane engine failure does happen and that experiencing one (albeit simulated) was a completely different affair from what I had imagined from reading about them. You have to be alert, and you must react quickly. -John, Q3 |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No...there are 17 accepted signals...none require radio...that's the beauty of signals.......
who put you in charge? Cookie On Sunday, October 26, 2014 9:59:21 AM UTC-4, Bruce Hoult wrote: On 2014-10-26 13:20:35 +0000, Cookie said: Its all "communication".. But the whole point of the "turn" signal is that the tow pilot doesn't need to or try to "fight" it. So which signals do you use radio for and which signals do you use the standard accepted signal? In this country there are two standard accepted non-radio signals from the towplane, and one from the glider: From towplane: - release immediately - check your airbrakes From glider: - I am unable to release Anything else is prearranged before takeoff, or else in flight over the radio. The SSA has no influence here. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]() http://www.soaringsafety.org/pilots/ic7.htm Gee...look at the first signal.... I suggest you contact the soaring safety foundation and have this situation rectified immediately! Cookie In this country there are two standard accepted non-radio signals from the towplane, and one from the glider: From towplane: - release immediately - check your airbrakes From glider: - I am unable to release Anything else is prearranged before takeoff, or else in flight over the radio. The SSA has no influence here. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm with you cookie. Radio communications often get stepped on or are somehow compromised... The STANDARD AMERICAN SOARING SIGNALS are not.
Boggs |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, October 26, 2014 11:09:11 AM UTC-4, Waveguru wrote:
I'm with you cookie. Radio communications often get stepped on or are somehow compromised... The STANDARD AMERICAN SOARING SIGNALS are not. Boggs Thank you! Cookie |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On Sunday, October 26, 2014 8:59:46 AM UTC-4, son_of_flubber wrote: The case of the towplane being on the ground and aborting takeoff when the glider is flying in ground effect is problematic. On Sunday, October 26, 2014 10:27:28 AM UTC-4, John Carlyle wrote: I don't understand why you call low level tow plane engine failure "problematic". Problematic noun 1. a thing that constitutes a problem or difficulty. The problem is obvious: the glider pilot has very little time avoid collision. jc: I've seen two actual low level engine failures in ten years of glider flying (to be specific, the glider was flying and the tow plane was not). Was there a collision? I've seen the aftermath of one such aborted takeoff. The tow plane and glider collided (no human injuries). What is the success rate for this maneuver? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
failure of an auto engine | Steve Hix[_2_] | Piloting | 0 | November 26th 09 12:05 AM |
AA Engine failure at LAX... | .Blueskies. | Piloting | 3 | June 13th 06 11:05 PM |
engine failure | swag | Piloting | 16 | June 8th 06 06:13 PM |
Engine failure | Jase Vanover | Piloting | 59 | October 30th 05 05:43 PM |
In-Flight Engine Failure | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 59 | April 30th 04 08:40 AM |