![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been searching quite a bit for something equivalent or similar to an
RV-9 but available as a plans-built. So far - no luck (seems that Van has done too good a job 8-)... Basic requirements are - well - same as an RV-9: Metal, 2-seat (not tandem), power from O-200/O-235/IO-240/O-320 - minimum cruise around 150-175mph, range approximately 500-600 NM+, very stable (non-aerobatic) Anybody here know of such a thing - or is it time to write Van a check 8-)...? Thanks for any input. Bill |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Netgeek wrote:
I've been searching quite a bit for something equivalent or similar to an RV-9 but available as a plans-built. Anybody here know of such a thing - or is it time to write Van a check 8-)...? Is buying a set of plans off Vans no longer an option? Frank |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank van der Hulst" wrote in message: Is buying a set of plans off Vans no longer an option? That would be the ideal. However, looking around their website I see that the "Construction Plans" are offered at US$275. I assumed that since they are really geared towards selling kits the plans describe the "construction" and don't really provide the type of detail for individual parts that would be required to "scratch build". They have a sample section from the RV-8 plans for download to review - and they sort of confirm my suspicion - i.e. they're meant to describe putting the kit together - not for fabricating individual components. Perhaps someone on here who has a set of plans can comment as to whether there's enough detail or not ????? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Netgeek" wrote in message ... "Frank van der Hulst" wrote in message: Is buying a set of plans off Vans no longer an option? That would be the ideal. However, looking around their website I see that the "Construction Plans" are offered at US$275. I assumed that since they are really geared towards selling kits the plans describe the "construction" and don't really provide the type of detail for individual parts that would be required to "scratch build". They have a sample section from the RV-8 plans for download to review - and they sort of confirm my suspicion - i.e. they're meant to describe putting the kit together - not for fabricating individual components. Perhaps someone on here who has a set of plans can comment as to whether there's enough detail or not ????? My RV-6 was from a kit, but the plans were plenty adequate to scratch build. Why don't you e-mail Van's and find out if their RV-9 plans are adequate for scratch building if that's the airplane you want? Given the time and cost of any airplane project, I'd spend the 30 seconds needed to e-mail Van's before you give up on the airplane you want. KB |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kyle Boatright" wrote:
"Netgeek" wrote in message ... "Frank van der Hulst" wrote in message: Is buying a set of plans off Vans no longer an option? That would be the ideal. However, looking around their website I see that the "Construction Plans" are offered at US$275. I assumed that since they are really geared towards selling kits the plans describe the "construction" and don't really provide the type of detail for individual parts that would be required to "scratch build". They have a sample section from the RV-8 plans for download to review - and they sort of confirm my suspicion - i.e. they're meant to describe putting the kit together - not for fabricating individual components. Perhaps someone on here who has a set of plans can comment as to whether there's enough detail or not ????? My RV-6 was from a kit, but the plans were plenty adequate to scratch build. Why don't you e-mail Van's and find out if their RV-9 plans are adequate for scratch building if that's the airplane you want? Given the time and cost of any airplane project, I'd spend the 30 seconds needed to e-mail Van's before you give up on the airplane you want. KB And as a next step, spend the ~$60 for "preview plans" which, as I understand it, are complete plans, except reduced to fit 11x17 sheets that are folded and put in a 3-ring binder, and they do not reflect all of the latest changes in the actual plans. But should be enough for you to see whether you'd want to build from the full set. FWIW, the excerpt you saw on the vans page was from the construction manual. There is an associated drawing (dwg 3) showing details. The first few drawings are 3: Horizontal stab (that these instructions are associated with), 4: elevator, 5: elev hinge parst and trim tab details, 6: vert stab, 7: rudder, 8: Horiz and vert stab part alignments and empennage rib fluting locations. -- Alex -- Replace "nospam" with "mail" to reply by email. Checked infrequently. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank van der Hulst wrote:
Netgeek wrote: I've been searching quite a bit for something equivalent or similar to an RV-9 but available as a plans-built. Anybody here know of such a thing - or is it time to write Van a check 8-)...? Is buying a set of plans off Vans no longer an option? Frank The -3, -4 & -6 plans at one time included enough info to scratchbuild. The plans for the newer planes have only assembly drawings & do not include dimension info except for the very few parts that must be fabricated. If you can revise your cruise requirements downward slightly, you might look at the Sonex. Charlie RV-4 flying RV-7 wings |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Charlie" wrote in message .. . If you can revise your cruise requirements downward slightly, you might look at the Sonex. Charlie Yep, I looked long and hard at the Sonex - a great little plane! The info pack and especially the flying video with Tony Spicer are compelling. However, by all accounts the Sonex is a "sport plane" (and apparently a very good one!) but many builders/flyers (and the factory) note that it's "neutrally stable" and not really made for cross-country. That's not meant to be critical - it's actually an attribute for its' intended mission - just doesn't fit my needs since I'm really looking for economical distance travelling...8-( I'm really up against what I'm sure many of you have gone through - and that is the requirements of She Who Must Be Obeyed 8-)... I'm thinking along the lines of Beech Sundowner for comfort and simplicity but with an extra 40-50 knots - she's thinking Business Class on Cathay Pacific. A compromise is going to be difficult! Bill |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Netgeek" wrote in
: "Charlie" wrote in message .. . If you can revise your cruise requirements downward slightly, you might look at the Sonex. Charlie Yep, I looked long and hard at the Sonex - a great little plane! The info pack and especially the flying video with Tony Spicer are compelling. However, by all accounts the Sonex is a "sport plane" (and apparently a very good one!) but many builders/flyers (and the factory) note that it's "neutrally stable" and not really made for cross-country. That's not meant to be critical - it's actually an attribute for its' intended mission - just doesn't fit my needs since I'm really looking for economical distance travelling...8-( I'm really up against what I'm sure many of you have gone through - and that is the requirements of She Who Must Be Obeyed 8-)... I'm thinking along the lines of Beech Sundowner for comfort and simplicity but with an extra 40-50 knots - she's thinking Business Class on Cathay Pacific. A compromise is going to be difficult! Bill You should fly in a Sonex before you dismiss it. A Sonex with a Jab 3300 cruises near 160mph. I don't think a RV-9 is even possitively stable. A Sonex is very easy to fly, you can hold the stick between your knees for a bit if nessasary and you could easily ignore the rudder except for landing in crosswinds. How long distance is your distance? -- -- ET :-) "A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."---- Douglas Adams |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Netgeek" wrote Yep, I looked long and hard at the Sonex - a great little plane! The info pack and especially the flying video with Tony Spicer are compelling. However, by all accounts the Sonex is a "sport plane" (and apparently a very good one!) but many builders/flyers (and the factory) note that it's "neutrally stable" and not really made for cross-country. Slap an autopilot in it, for less than $2000, and it would be "real" stable. -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
want to trade 601 plans for 701 plans | [email protected] | Home Built | 0 | January 27th 05 07:50 PM |
Unused plans question | Doc Font | Home Built | 0 | December 8th 04 09:16 PM |
Modifying Vision plans for retractable gear... | Chris | Home Built | 1 | February 27th 04 09:23 PM |
Plans Built Glider | Jim Culp | Soaring | 6 | September 8th 03 10:14 AM |
Plans Built Glider? | Eggs | Soaring | 3 | September 6th 03 10:21 PM |