![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:39:57 GMT, George Patterson
wrote: Dave Butler wrote: NorthNet http://www.ntd.net/internet.htm claims to offer DSL. In nearly all of the U.S., the internet providers are running on lines that they've taken over from the local Bell company. The lines are still provisioned by the local baby Bell. If the local Bell says that they can't give you DSL at your location, nobody else can either. That doesn't stop the internet service companies from claiming they can. I think the baby Bell in that area is Ameritec? Here, Earthlink was claiming that they could provide me DSL for two years before my line could actually support it. Verizon had to condition the line for DSL before anyone could provide service on it. My previous home was in a new subdivision in a growing area of my community. We were one of the first homes in the subdivision. We were approx 16k feet from the CO, with a clean line (no DLCs, repeaters, etc.). At the time (~4-5 years ago) Ameritech was the phone carrier, and they did not provide DSL. I was able to get a CLEC to provide DSL services. As the subdivision built and more phone and data services were provisioned on the bundles accompanying my phone line - the DSL service got worse and worse. Eventually, it got to a point where I could 'sense' network loading based upon whether the DSL modem would sync and provide service. It worked fine during low times of usage - the mid of the day, and the mid of the night. However, during peak usage hours of 7am-9am, and 4pm-10pm it would never work. An interesting problem, which I solved by moving. -Nathan |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "Juan Jimenez" said:
But to where? What part of Wittman Field? WiFi will get you about a 300 ft radius, maybe a bit more if you get fancy with the antennas. You then have to deploy an infrastructure to which you can connect the access points. It takes money, and all for 1 week's worth? Maybe 2 if you count exhibitors, volunteers, etc. The Linksys WRT54G wireless access point/router supports (at least it does if you get the Sveasoft firmware, and believe me, you don't want it without it) a mode where each WAP can relay traffic for all the other WAPs in its range, so you can chain a bunch of them together wirelessly with only one connected to the cable/dsl/fat pipe. You can also turn up the power on them and increase the range. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ "Man in the tower, this is the man in the bird, I'm ready to go, so give me the word." "Man in the bird, this is the man in the tower, you sound funny, delay's an hour." - Rod Machado |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Blanche Cohen" wrote in message ... And just how much do you think Airventure grosses that week? Just pointing out that Airventure charges to get in is not a justification for spending money on a WiFi infrastructure to be used just 2 weeks out of the year. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George Patterson wrote:
In nearly all of the U.S., the internet providers are running on lines that they've taken over from the local Bell company. The lines are still provisioned by the local baby Bell. If the local Bell says that they can't give you DSL at your location, nobody else can either. That doesn't stop the internet service companies from claiming they can. Exactly. That's why I mentioned in one of my earlier postings that DSL providers are notorious liars. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Juan Jimenez wrote:
But to where? What part of Wittman Field? Pick a spot. It doesn't have to cover the whole field. WiFi will get you about a 300 ft radius, maybe a bit more if you get fancy with the antennas. You then have to deploy an infrastructure to which you can connect the access points. It takes money, and all for 1 week's worth? Maybe 2 if you count exhibitors, volunteers, etc. I don't think the infrastructure is *so* expensive just to provide a hot spot, if you don't try to cover the whole airfield. The local coffehouse can afford it. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Montblack wrote:
("Dave Butler" wrote) I wonder whether anyone has contacted EAA and requested that they get on the stick and provide WiFi on the North 40. Found an open hot-spot last year, next to the N-40 showers (by the homes) one night at around 9:30pm. Stylus and a handheld something - don't remember the brand the guy had. Heh, that might have been me. :-) I found that spot by the homes next to the N40 showers with my Tungsten|C. Dave |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nathan Young" wrote in message ... An interesting problem, which I solved by moving. And when the ashtrays full you buy a new car, right? :!~) |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Butler" wrote in message news:1114695955.672961@sj-nntpcache-5... Exactly. That's why I mentioned in one of my earlier postings that DSL providers are notorious liars. So are the dial-up providers. -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Linksys WRT54G wireless access point/router supports (at least it does
if you get the Sveasoft firmware, and believe me, you don't want it without it) a mode where each WAP can relay traffic for all the other WAPs in its range, so you can chain a bunch of them together wirelessly with only one connected to the cable/dsl/fat pipe. You can also turn up the power on them and increase the range. Ha. We tried the "repeater" method at the hotel, in an effort to adequately cover two 3-story buildings. It turned out to be incredibly unstable. All it would take was a 2 second power outage, and the repeater "lost its mind" and would not recover -- a completely untenable solution in a commercial application. Other times it would lose its connection for no apparent reason at all, and have to be "rebooted" from scratch -- a time consuming, aggravating affair. Our solution was a separate DSL line and network in both buildings. A bit more expensive, but rock-solid. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think the infrastructure is *so* expensive just to provide a hot
spot, if you don't try to cover the whole airfield. The local coffehouse can afford it. It's not. We covered our entire hotel -- two 3-story buildings, plus the pool area -- for a grand investment of maybe $225. (Not counting the monthly DSL line charges, of course.) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" "Dave Butler" wrote in message news:1114696520.125471@sj-nntpcache-5... Juan Jimenez wrote: But to where? What part of Wittman Field? Pick a spot. It doesn't have to cover the whole field. WiFi will get you about a 300 ft radius, maybe a bit more if you get fancy with the antennas. You then have to deploy an infrastructure to which you can connect the access points. It takes money, and all for 1 week's worth? Maybe 2 if you count exhibitors, volunteers, etc. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WI airport closure | Mike Spera | Owning | 0 | March 9th 05 01:53 PM |
NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
N94 Airport may expand into mobile home community, locals supportive | William Summers | Piloting | 0 | March 18th 04 03:03 AM |
Rules on what can be in a hangar | Brett Justus | Owning | 13 | February 27th 04 05:35 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |